Agreed. Good things happen because people have a vision, it's not for nothing that people say a camel is a horse designed by a committee (which, to be fair is a horrible thing to say to the wonderful camel).
Bro, keep huffing that copium. WaL has like 6 girls with 2 scenes each, SS has like 30+ girls with a shit ton having more than 5 scenes AND it has a repeatable pregnancy mechanic. It's like saying Veggietales is gonna be the next Harry Potter lol
They were saying that in the context of development speed I believe. Of course summertime has more scenes, it has been in development for a lot longer than this game.
The pregnancy mechanic is SS is completely shit, your baby doesn't even have a face and dissapears after some weeks. The plot and writing of WaL are much better as are the girls/character models. SS has better animation (which sometimes is completely distorted, like roxxy solo sex scene in the bottle game) and better minigames/game mechanics. To be honest the two games are similar the only difference is the size of available content, It's not a difference in quality.
If you expect that WaL is actually gonna have named children or any sort of actual kid content beyond "oh we shipped him/her off to a babysitter" you're in for a ride lol.
You'd be surprised about that actually... but "the good stuff" is reserved foir games with a limited character pool and one time pregnancy.
It's possible to achieve. It could be done by having the option to marry a woman at some point to unlock the pregnancy route and then you can have some quality time with her, some time skips if the devs offer a few stages of pregnancy and another time skip when the baby is there. Basically a larger CG scene that ends in a game over. To prevent people saving during that scene saving should be impossible.
To be honest, the whole problem is that it's a lot of additional work, which seems to be an issue with pregnancy content in general. Either you make it quick and it'll seem a bit half-assed or you have to spend a significant amount of development time on it, while there's a chance that only few players will actually really appreciate that effort.
You are right about that but you can use that argument on several kinks and fetishes. Not everyone likes anal, some people only like M/M content and will be disappointed if WaL might have that later but only a tiny bit and some people want more or less sex in a game.
Hm, I think anal and pregnancy are almost the perfect opposites in this case. To add anal you can just add a scene or two with a few lines to almost every character and it'll be fine. That's a very reasonable effort.
Oh, I totally agree and I'm not agianst that at all. I just want(ed) to add why it's not that clear for many who don't actually care that much. I mean, there's surely large number of devs who don't like every fetish they implement. If somebody is really into it, that's great, but for a dev who looks at fetishes he may wants add, pregnancy isn't the most obvious. But that's just my opinion.
You mean in a sexual way, right? I can't imagine Steam going apeshit about games with children if they are just treated like children and not become the fantasy of an abuser.^^'
Just having an underage character showing up on screen in an adult game, even in a wholesome, non-sexual context, will put the game at risk of being deplatformed
Makes me wonder why Steam and Patreon haven't fused yet. They both seem to not be on the bright side and having a fair look into a topic isn't that fun if you can count money as an alternative.
