In fact, it is a problem that goes beyond technological creation, and that occurs with each new technology. This is a basic problem (political and social) linked to economic capitalism. Since the 19th century, all businesses have been in a crazy competition for profit. If your competitor overtakes you, then you will do everything to catch up with her, see overtake her in turn.You are so completely wrong on that though. That is what happens when you get your knowledge straight out of twitter
Artists will never be replaced, the same way as web developers weren't replaced when software like frontpage and similar started appearing. Whether you like it or not, AI is already part of some software artists use, such as Photoshop.
Aside from the copyright stuff Meaning Less mentioned, even if this was not a concern, there are things only Artists can do and AI will never be able to replicate, no matter how good it gets.
The only thing AI does is making art more accessible to other people who are not talented artistically.
However, you still need to put work to make something good, even the cherry picked examples have some issues if you analyze an image long enough, you simply cannot use them as-is in a project, even if copyright was not an issue.
As if there was anything worth taking pfft.
That's interesting. For the games i've come across on here with AI-generated images, i knew it was AI from a quick glance at the screenshots before even noticing the tag.
these takes will never cease to confuse me. Its as if all the humans forgot that the system they exist in didnt confer the ability to be creative to you. A creator simply enjoys creating. It doesnt matter if the world is flooded by a plethora of generated art tailored to each individual. The only people terrified of this are those that wish to keep art within a structured paradigm set by Academia, both in the west and east. As someone that is formally trained in art, college and all, I get pissed hearing all these artists whine and moan about this when they never gave a shit about automation until it affected them.
.... or not being able to afford a decent artist? Some game devs are only starting on their first game you know? You have to start somewhere.
Still, it's dirty to change the definition of 'intelligence' to market it as something that it isn't. There is no intelligence in said "ai"... Evolutionary biologists, and other similiar experts don't consider a hornet, or other insects, to have any intelligence at all, because they don't have a thought process - which is what intelligence is.
Yeah, the long and short of it is that this technology depends entirely on taking images and text that people worked really hard on without their permission to create cheap mock-ups that are legally distinct. This couldn't be any more flagrantly a way for the powers that be to exploit the rest of us even more efficiently than they already can. Society is not ready for this technology and how we end up dealing with it will determine just how bad things are going to get.
To me that is nonsense.
I don't think AI itself can be regulated when all you need to take advantage of it is a modern-ish home computer. Publishing AI created content is a different story though, several big subscription services are already cracking down on it or considering doing so.
Those are precisely the artist that will benefit from AI art.
