Why the world hates us?

anne O'nymous

I'm not grumpy, I'm just coded that way.
Modder
Donor
Respected User
Jun 10, 2017
11,950
18,661
Actually women did participate on your so called "dick measuring contests" infact were more ruthless and brutal. Olga of Kiev, Empress Wu Zetian,
and , , to name the most known about the oldest time of history, and obviously many others. But in regard of the number of wars, and conflicts started, women are an exception.


and not to mention they did participate in many wars
The among the ~800,000 that served in the Red Army during the WWII, .


so yes women do grow dicks
Do they, or are their fighting for actual motives?


and you sir have clearly been riding them to label wars as simply dick measuring contest.
And you are quick when it come to jump on conclusion. Perhaps should have you firstly questioned the use of "dick-measurement contest" before assuming.


Is everyone on this site biased and stupid?
Seeing your post, I wonder...
 

Count Morado

Fragrant Asshole
Donor
Respected User
Jan 21, 2022
10,470
20,404
How does the quote thing work on mobile i wanna reply to more
Highlight the text and select "quote" to add to quotes and "reply" for reply only to that selection.
1749320591471.png
When you have quotes to insert, you'll see this option pop up at the bottom of the text window.
 

Shiko200

Newbie
Jun 22, 2019
75
65
and , , to name the most known about the oldest time of history, and obviously many others. But in regard of the number of wars, and conflicts started, women are an exception.




The among the ~800,000 that served in the Red Army during the WWII, .




Do they, or are their fighting for actual motives?



And you are quick when it come to jump on conclusion. Perhaps should have you firstly questioned the use of "dick-measurement contest" before assuming.




Seeing your post, I wonder...
You should wonder dude, are you really saying men fought in wars without motives?

Back in early human history, wars were about survival. Men were more expendable biologically as a tribe could survive with fewer men but not fewer women. Nomadic tribes like the Mongols or Germanic tribes fought to protect their grazing land or food. If they didnt fight, they starved or got taken over. The Roman Empire’s expansion was about controlling grain in Egypt, silver in Spain, or trade routes in Asia Minor was not some personal reason. In WWI, soldiers on all sides were forced into trenches by conscription laws. The French called mutineers cowards and even executed many to set an example. Men didn’t go to war for fun or glory. Most of the time they had no choice. They were expected to fight to protect their people or just to survive. Through history, men were treated as expendable the ones sent to kill or die so others could live. They weren’t the masterminds behind it all, they were the ones paying the price. Same goes for the women who fought in these dick measuring contests. I dont see the point of you giving me links or articles where women fought alongside men i already know that.
 
  • Like
Reactions: MWPA78

Shiko200

Newbie
Jun 22, 2019
75
65
Highlight the text and select "quote" to add to quotes and "reply" for reply only to that selection.
View attachment 4919125
When you have quotes to insert, you'll see this option pop up at the bottom of the text window.
Thanks man now i can argue better on a piracy site better. (genuinely thanks though. :) Edit: As i am typing this clicking on insert quotes just says message added to multi quote but it still doesnt works as it does on my laptop.
 
  • Haha
Reactions: MissCougar

MissCougar

Member
Feb 20, 2025
355
682
Europe beg to disagree with you.
as president, while until few months ago. Add to this around twenty that were president of their country in the past. And, if you include the lead of the government/prime minister, since not all European countries are actually lead by their president, you easily reach a hundred.
Yes, I understand that there are groups and countries out there that have taken that step- and that's totally fine. If I were a voter there I may not have voted for it, but it would depend.

Like if my option was Hillary vs any man, I'd probably vote for almost any man. If it was like a Tulsi Gabbard though, then I might vote Tulsi. In general though for me to opt to think a woman could handle that level of stress would have to be at another level of operation. I've seen some great woman leaders in my time, but I'll say it's more rare than great male leaders.

While I agree with you regarding the fact that capabilities must prevail, the main issue here is that, until recently, women couldn't even dream to have such career. This mean that it's not a question of inherent capabilities, but of lack of available experienced women.
It will need still one (probably two for the USA) decades before there's enough women with both the competence and experience. And still a bit more than two generations before they come at equality with men, because having graduated the same year than them.

Have you had the chance to be one?

I remember my high school years and how everyone was still acting at those times. I followed a said "scientific" curriculum, and girls were really rare, not because they were dumb or not wanted to be there, but because they were forced on other curriculum, even when they clearly had the capabilities.
My wife ended with a degree after loosing three years trying to escape the dead end she was forced into. My mother got PhD at 35, after starting back her studies as stubborn adult. And France is a relatively liberal country not too much misogynist.
Yes. I have been a good baby factory. :ROFLMAO:

And I know about being pushed in other directions by everyone. it's not just institutions but your friends and family and social norms. When I was little I liked computers. Nobody understood that at all, so it was an uphill war against everything, not to mention just liking computers when I was growing up labeled you as a nerd outcast. So I got dolls I never played with and nobody cared even if I said exactly What I did want.

I was pushed into waitressing and factory work when I got out of high school and during.

It took me like another 10 or 15 years before I allowed myself to get into tech again and try to do it professionally more.

Im not implying that there aren't issues on both sides and lots of social norms people have to break through to do what they want to do. It exists and it can be a wall.
 

MissCougar

Member
Feb 20, 2025
355
682
View attachment 4918802
Men are just as, if not worse - they think they can get away with it because they think they are entitled to. Look at the US President when he doesn't get his way. Look at Musk when he gets pushed out. I am no fan of Margaret Thatcher nor Hillary Clinton - but those two women had more composure and strength than quite a few men who have held the same roles in power.

You've raised son(s). Even if they did not exhibit it - you have seen their friends and those who let their emotions run wild and filled with pettiness.

So, I have to highly disagree.
I have, and I have seen what they have to go through and what they still have to endure. Understand that my stance on life is a mix of my own feeling and not wanting my boys to suffer in this world that is turning more against them in a lot of new ways.

I can't understand the mental situations men have to go through but I understand mine, and I feel like the bar for me to follow a female leader is higher than a male leader, but there are still great female leaders out there.

I want the best for all people and I want the best for men as much as women. I've been the strong shoulder for many men to cry on due to life problems, and Ice cried on my fair share of shoulders too.
 

Count Morado

Fragrant Asshole
Donor
Respected User
Jan 21, 2022
10,470
20,404
I feel like the bar for me to follow a female leader is higher than a male leader
Honestly, I am not trying to argue this point. I am, however, sharing back with you what I am reading of your writing.

If I am understanding this - what you are saying is you have a lower bar for males in order for you to follow them than to follow females. Or, to put it less specifically, you are willing to accept mediocrity from one sex over another sex?
I think you're lost. Politics General thread is that way -> for posting pictures of the .
 

MissCougar

Member
Feb 20, 2025
355
682
Honestly, I am not trying to argue this point. I am, however, sharing back with you what I am reading of your writing.

If I am understanding this - what you are saying is you have a lower bar for males in order for you to follow them than to follow females. Or, to put it less specifically, you are willing to accept mediocrity from one sex over another sex?
You are correct. And I know it is bad or not fair or filled with equality of me, I own that. :|
 

Count Morado

Fragrant Asshole
Donor
Respected User
Jan 21, 2022
10,470
20,404
You are correct. And I know it is bad or not fair or filled with equality of me, I own that. :|
I'm not saying that - but it is exactly what opponents of a lot of the initiatives for equity are saying is happening because of the initiatives... "They weren't the best applicant/employee/candidate. They only got hired/promoted/appointed because they are ________."

Thing is - what you are saying you do is what's been happening for centuries in Europe and European colonies and former European Empire territories such as the USA - prioritizing men over women (and other certain demographics over others). I can't speak for other cultures because I haven't properly educated myself on them.

But now that we are attempting to shift to equity, some are pushing back and trying to keep a hold of their "advantages." Which is the argument, really, that OP has been trying to make. They want to keep their bigger share of the pie instead of having a share that is more equitable.
Odd. And just last night I was whipping up a new batch of interesting popcorn pics...fortuitus.

View attachment 4919360
Now please do one of Sabrina Carpenter. No, wait. I don't want you to do anything illegal by creating a lewd image of a real person. I'll just use my imagination (It's better than AI, anyway).
Bah, he's not even a quarter of the monarch his mother was.
Truth.

1749324793531.png
 

drag0nf6y

Active Member
Feb 28, 2025
525
1,000
idk about the misandry thing, but that song was trash. i can’t believe there’s still people with such garbage tier music taste
 
  • Like
Reactions: MWPA78

morphnet

Well-Known Member
Aug 3, 2017
1,365
2,903
No one’s denying women face serious issues. They always have. But that’s exactly why it used to be understood that men have their own cross to bear, and society used to respect that. Now, that’s all gone. You can throw all the stats you want, but it doesn’t change this: Men built civilizations, fought wars, died in coal mines, jumped on grenades, and carried entire families with no emotional support. And for what? To now be told they’re "privileged" because they aren’t constantly crying online? Modern culture sees a man express pain and instantly mocks him, invalidates him, or calls it entitlement. Even feeling tired is now seen as weakness if you’re male. You listed all these stats, but none of that erases the crisis men are in right now. Skyrocketing suicide rates, purpose collapse, no rites of passage, declining father figures, broken family courts, zero dating leverage. That is the real world now. The fact that pointing this out triggers people tells me everything.
Ok so you are just going to ignore the "world" point made, the point made about different social values in the world. Fact is you don't care about "men" you're scared because you can't fit in and are making a post based solely on selfishness fueled by willful ignorance and can be seen in every one of your posts.

No one’s denying women face serious issues.
Women are not facing serious issues, women are facing serious issues CREATED by men, a very important distinction and you embrace glossing over these types of distinctions throughout your posts.

But that’s exactly why it used to be understood that men have their own cross to bear, and society used to respect that.
and by society, you mean men? As for the "cross to bear", men go out and build an absurdly large cross, pick it up and then walk around going "oh woe is me" at some point, some generation is going to point out they should stop building damn crosses and get to work fixing everything they broke.

Now, that’s all gone. You can throw all the stats you want, but it doesn’t change this: Men built civilizations, fought wars, died in coal mines, jumped on grenades, and carried entire families with no emotional support. And for what?
Firstly, let me quickly fix this for you...

"Men built civilizations, they started wars, fought wars, died in coal mines while helping to destroy the planet, jumped on grenades that other men threw, in wars MEN started, and SOMETIMES carried entire families with no emotional support SOMETIMES."

Now that we got that out the way...

1) Men built civilizations, cultures and societies, MEN created the burdens they had to carry, men cut off most of the support they could've had throughout all those times by making stupid choices.

2) Men started wars over land, money, religion, politics and many MANY other reasons (ALL MAN MADE) and then yes they fought in them.

3) coal mines? I guess men died farming doesn't have the same visual impact? Yes, men died farming in coal mines, coal mines owned by men, men who wouldn't improve safety conditions, wouldn't pay a proper wage, wouldn't look after the workers but yes, men did die in man owned coal mines....

4) Jumped on grenades? you're really reaching for the sympathy vote with imagery here :rolleyes: Yes men jumped on grenades, in wars started by men, many times for reasons that could've and should've been avoided.
Then soldiers came home to countries lead and run BY MEN and were forgotten, ignored and in some cases treated very badly by both the government and society.

5) Carried entire families with no emotional support? really? this part extends past exaggeration into the realms of pure ignorance. You should try visiting some rural areas in that small world of yours an actually talking to another human being instead of getting your info off a phone screen.

(we also shouldn't forget to mention all those men who walked out on their families)

And for what?
For whatever men decided was the reason of the hour, power, money, religion, land etc. etc. take your pick.

To now be told they’re "privileged" because they aren’t constantly crying online? Modern culture sees a man express pain and instantly mocks him, invalidates him, or calls it entitlement.
I'm confused, do they mock you because you are crying or aren't crying?

Even feeling tired is now seen as weakness if you’re male.
You keep throwing out these random things without anything to back them up and given your habit of exaggeration and glossing of important distinctions nothing you write can be taken at face value.

You listed all these stats, but none of that erases the crisis men are in right now. Skyrocketing suicide rates, purpose collapse, no rites of passage, declining father figures, broken family courts, zero dating leverage.
1) Skyrocketing suicide rates, given the fact that you show no signs of educating yourself on the poor points you try to make is it safe to assume you are just parroting this and didn't actually look into it? Asking because the data does NOT support your claim. Given that the US just finished a 20+year war and as many as 24 veterans die by suicide per day and an additional 20 from “self-injury mortality” not to mention the number of people who suffer from mental health problems, were these numbers factored in? and for the record, those veterans and people with mental health problems were let down by governments lead and run by men.






2) purpose collapse, really? in todays world with more opportunities than every before, more ways to explore, educate and find a place, you are claiming men are loosing purpose because women are starting to get equal rights?

3) no rites of passage, ok this one you have to explain....

4) declining father figures, ok, you are either coping and pasting or trolling.... if you are trying to pass this off as a new or recent or lately because of women problem you really are more out of touch with reality than I first thought....

5) broken family courts, :ROFLMAO::ROFLMAO::ROFLMAO: ok... point to a time when they weren't broken and to blame that on women :ROFLMAO::ROFLMAO::ROFLMAO:

6) zero dating leverage, well from your posts, I'm guessing it has nothing to do with the current state of affairs and EVERYTHING to do with you.

That is the real world now. The fact that pointing this out triggers people tells me everything.
What you have posted isn't even close to reality or the real world and seriously, you have to stop referring to that small patch of land as the WHOLE WORLD, it's not and never will be... You should also stop throwing around the word "triggered". When people see something stupid posted and point it out, it does not mean they are triggered, it just means there are still some people with patience enough to take the time to explain instead of meme dumping the thread into obscurity.

Now those roles are gone or ridiculed, and what’s left is mockery, and a kind of quiet exile. And yes, many men are breaking down under it, whether anyone wants to talk about it or not. If you think that doesn’t belong here or a random forum on the internet, then where exactly does it belong? Because when men speak up in schools, they're toxic. In media, they're ignored. In public, they're shamed.
The problem with you guys is you think women want to race ahead and take over everything, you think this because it's how you think and what you would do. Instead women just want equality and to stand next to men NOT infront of them.

You talk about men speaking up but they don't, they ramble on using irrational claims based in fear and ignorance. Instead of evolving and making compromises so everyone can be equal, these men don't want ANY change and want things to stay as they are. They don't care if it causes suffering to women and they over look the suffering it causes them because hey even a poor man in the gutter is still a man right?
 

lamba

Member
Jul 10, 2018
142
235
also anyone who dismissively types "Sure, women are getting r4ped and abused but..." about real life sexual and domestic violence (and can't even be adult enough to type the actual word: raped) should probably consider a bit longer than a moment of introspection.
If you're in the top ~10% of men, life is great. If you're in the top 5%, you're basically living life with cheat codes. If you're in the top 1%, you're getting paid to exist and be physically attractive. As long as you don't do anything stupid like murder or rape, you're set for life. And even when credibly accused with incriminating evidence you can pull a Tate, have loyal fans and even with outstanding arrest warrants you can still be a free man.

This doesn't describe most men, though. Your average man is condemned to a life of solitude and extreme isolation and even pointing that out will get you reams of insults and, "lol dealwithit' responses.

This, in turn, creates an environment where society is indifferent to men who find themselves on the wrong side of an issue. Men statistically are not taken seriously as the victims of sexual assault. Domestic abuse is statistically a 50:50 issue but the male victims of it typically are not taken seriously either. It's propped up as a joke at their expense, or a, "Well you should have known better" type situation when dealing with clinical sociopaths and dark triad personalities, even though half the point of those diagnosis is that these are typically people who got extremely good at being manipulative and deceptive. A bad sociopath just ends up in prison.

When dealing with a legal system that overwhelmingly errs on the side of women in any dispute, it is very easy to assume we live in a matriarchy, even when those laws typically exist because of bad male actors. But the reality of is also that while most men have it bad, most women have it even worse. Men are held to unrealistic standards, women are held to even more unrealistic standards. The grass isn't greener on the other side.

I was watching Sabrina Carpenter’s new song (named Manchild), it’s literally a man-hating, slay-and-cheat girl song.
Women (and men, actually) can make their entire personality 'I hate men' and it will generally be socially tolerated even if it's an incredibly shallow position to take. And you know what? They may legitimately have good reasons to have reached that point. The flip side of a society that treats men like they're disposable toilet wipes is a society that actively teaches men that they have to launch themselves at women because even negative attention is treated as a greater social value than none.

Women, understandably, might resent that. Every single lesbian I ever hung out with except one had their stories of trauma that inevitably involved men who didn't understand that, 'no' is a complete sentence. But I'd also remember that every accusation is a confession. The inverse of a dude who insists every single girlfriend he ever had was 'crazy' is women who insist that all the men they date are 'man babies.'

But now that we are attempting to shift to equity, some are pushing back and trying to keep a hold of their "advantages." Which is the argument, really, that OP has been trying to make. They want to keep their bigger share of the pie instead of having a share that is more equitable.
The problem is that attempting to reverse existing inequities is typically done without depriving the biggest benefactors of it of what they've gained from it, and instead it finds people in a tone deaf situation where they explain that it's the lower class who have to pay the price of something they frequently had nothing to do with. And it's completely reasonable for them to resent that. The conversation on something like Reparations (to use a US example) is never whether or not the children of slave owners and people with last names like "Rockefeller" and "Vanderbilt" and "Ford" and "Carnegie" should be made to pay for their exploitive tendencies, it's always whether or not an amorphous "American Tax Payer" should be made to pay for it. The same people who benefitted from 'rugged individualistic capitalism' are very quick to argue that the expenses of that system should be collectivized.
 
  • Like
  • Hey there
Reactions: Geigi and hu lover

wat3rfall

Newbie
May 15, 2025
22
28
Ok so you are just going to ignore the "world" point made, the point made about different social values in the world. Fact is you don't care about "men" you're scared because you can't fit in and are making a post based solely on selfishness fueled by willful ignorance and can be seen in every one of your posts.
No, I’m not ignoring it. But the idea that men’s issues are suddenly invalid because different cultures have different expressions of gender norms is a cop-out. The pain exists regardless of region. Men suffer from lack of emotional outlets in both Western and non-Western societies.
Women are not facing serious issues, women are facing serious issues CREATED by men, a very important distinction and you embrace glossing over these types of distinctions throughout your posts.
Then by your logic, men should suffer in silence because their gender produced the abusers? That’s collective guilt, not justice. Men and women have BOTH harmed each other and have both suffered in systems created before they were born.
"Men built civilizations, they started wars, fought wars, died in coal mines while helping to destroy the planet, jumped on grenades that other men threw, in wars MEN started, and SOMETIMES carried entire families with no emotional support SOMETIMES."
Yes, history is a miss and heavily contextual. But it doesn't change the fact that men disproportionately paid the cost. Over 90% of workplace deaths are male ( ). You can mock "jumped on grenades" all you want, but it happened. Thousands of times. And that kind of sacrifice used to be honored. Now it's just sneered at, just like how you did here.
Skyrocketing suicide rates
Suicide among men is 3-4x higher than women worldwide, and that’s public health data.
  • WHO:
  • CDC:
It doesn’t matter whether a war caused it or not. The crisis is real. You keep framing everything as “well men did it to themselves,” as if that makes it okay or less tragic.
purpose collapse, really?
Yes. Purpose and meaning are cultural products. Remove rites of passage, stable family structures, and expectations beyond materialism, and you’ll get disillusioned men. You can read thinkers like Viktor Frankl ("Man’s Search for Meaning") or even recent studies on male loneliness to see how dire it's become:
declining father figures
Fatherlessness has doubled since the 1960s in many Western countries and correlates with worse outcomes for boys: mental health, incarceration, education. This is well-documented:
broken family courts
Even progressive sources acknowledge systemic bias:
zero dating leverage
Men at the bottom of the dating hierarchy are increasingly locked out of relationships. That's not incel whining. It's a real trend driven by tech and changing norms: &
The problem with you guys is you think women want to race ahead and take over everything, you think this because it's how you think and what you would do.
This projection says more about your worldview than mine. I never said women want to dominate. I said men are punished for showing weakness. And that remains true whether women are rising or not. In a world allegedly more empathetic, one half is still told to shut up and "man up" anytime they express their emotions.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Shiko200