>It's not mc who corrupts girls, but the devs themselves
It was said in singular and only for WVM's dev, you distorting my words. It's not good to distort other people words for your gain. 'Cause all you say afterwards is just development of distortion.
>You view girls who gradually want to have sex with you corruption.
I don't and never said otherwise. It's unwise to answer not words that was said to you but your own conclusion from these words.
>And the way that you state your opinion, because it is an opinion and not a fact, is wrong
Imagine there's not only your point of view but other people's too. You're basically insinuating that you're perfect and always right. And I'm here to tell you that is wrong (actually not, but who cares). If my manner of speech infuriates you then maybe the source of that is not on my side.
I see we have nothing to discuss. It's pity, I hoped otherwise.
>It was said in singular and only for WVM's dev, you distorting my words. It's not good to distort other people words for your gain. 'Cause all you say afterwards is just development of distortion.
- I'm quoting that specifically because you are pointing out WMV's dev. I'm not distorting your words, you aren't understanding what I'm saying, therefore making you think I am distorting your words. There's a difference between me making up what you're saying and you not grasping what I am saying.
>I don't and never said otherwise. It's unwise to answer not words that was said to you but your own conclusion from these words.
- Then answer me this if this isn't what you're implying. Why is it that when Jamie and Shauna come up with something on their own, it is the dev "corrupting" them rather than it being part of their personality? Just because you're shy, doesn't mean you don't like sex or can't be a sexual deviant. You seem to think those 2 personality traits can't go together, and I'm saying that they can.
>Imagine there's not only your point of view but other people's too. You're basically insinuating that you're perfect and always right. And I'm here to tell you that is wrong (actually not, but who cares). If my manner of speech infuriates you then maybe the source of that is not on my side.
- 3 points here. First point, that is the entire reason why people are answering you with animosity. Because every single one of your comments is stating that your point of view is everyone's point of view, and that is wrong. Secondly, you misread that statement. I didn't say your opinion is wrong. You're allowed to have an opinion, and people are allowed to disagree with your opinion. I stated that THE WAY you state your opinion is wrong. I am not insinuating that I am perfect, I am insinuating that your way of communication is wrong and you rub people the wrong way with the way you state your opinions. Thirdly, this is a forum, where your manner of speech is the only thing that people can go off of. You were the one wondering why people were answering you with such animosity. That reason is because of your manner of speech. Yes it is a problem on our side because of the way we have read your comment and decided to respond. But it is also a problem on your side for not being able to effectively communicate your OPINION (because again it is your opinion, and not a fact). And I am here to tell you that you are also not perfect, no one is, so to put the blame on everyone but yourself for how we interpret your communication is pretty awful, and you yourself are insinuating that you are perfect and remain blameless for getting such angry comments.
My last point, if you are going to argue with native English speakers about the way you type your opinions, maybe you need to be a bit more introspective as to how your phrasing can be wrong, instead of trying to say you have no blame, and everyone is arguing with you for no reason. Just sayin. *shrug*