- Aug 15, 2018
- 144
- 833
I'm surprised that there's over 200 people still supporting this fucking creep, There's so many games that are 100x better than this pile of shit.
Sunk cost fallacy, there are also plenty of games on here that get funding when the devs for them are lazy (yet still get thousands even though there are much better games with harder working devs). Some examples include milfy city, taffy tales, etc. It is just a matter of people settling for garbage instead of expecting quality after giving the devs thousands. If people actually made some effort and took a stand and removed their funding when devs started being lazy and not working on their games, it would force devs with a boot up their asses to get to work and we would have more completed games and higher quality ones. Personally I'm tired of half assed bullshit being put out now adays when we could be getting stuff like https://f95zone.to/threads/sol-rui-after-mini-v1-10-enokippu.155573/ devs would be making much more money too if they actually made good games like that as well as the playerbase and reputation they would gain would serve them for a long time and actually be a good reliable money maker.I'm surprised that there's over 200 people still supporting this fucking creep, There's so many games that are 100x better than this pile of shit.
The key point here is that people should vote with their wallets, and I have an example post (link) that proves this point.Sunk cost fallacy, there are also plenty of games on here that get funding when the devs for them are lazy (yet still get thousands even though there are much better games with harder working devs). [...] It is just a matter of people settling for garbage instead of expecting quality after giving the devs thousands. If people actually made some effort and took a stand and removed their funding when devs started being lazy and not working on their games, it would force devs with a boot up their asses to get to work and we would have more completed games and higher quality ones. [...]
Well, that's unfortunate. That almost seems like a decent game, but I have zero interest in female protags.Sunk cost fallacy, there are also plenty of games on here that get funding when the devs for them are lazy (yet still get thousands even though there are much better games with harder working devs). Some examples include milfy city, taffy tales, etc. It is just a matter of people settling for garbage instead of expecting quality after giving the devs thousands. If people actually made some effort and took a stand and removed their funding when devs started being lazy and not working on their games, it would force devs with a boot up their asses to get to work and we would have more completed games and higher quality ones. Personally I'm tired of half assed bullshit being put out now adays when we could be getting stuff like https://f95zone.to/threads/sol-rui-after-mini-v1-10-enokippu.155573/ devs would be making much more money too if they actually made good games like that as well as the playerbase and reputation they would gain would serve them for a long time and actually be a good reliable money maker.
I wouldn't say I that I'm very self-aware, but if you're going around f95 cancelling games for being immoral then I would genuinely question whether you would pass a mirror test.The key point here is that people should vote with their wallets, and I have an example post (link) that proves this point.
A game named King of Corpses was so controversial to the game's developer's fanbase that when he said he was going to continue work on the project over a hundred of his paying fans left, putting him in financial jeopardy and forcing him to end his project. If people really commit to throwing aside a project and sending firm monetary discipline to a troublesome developer, change will happen in either better developer behavior or closing the project.
I know most of us here are no-life loser degenerates, but holy shit are we so far gone as to make up justifications for irl grooming? Are you seriously trying to argue "age doesn't matter, maturity does"?Followed a bit the news and honestly idk what to think about, to a point some ppl wish that "adults" never have to be part of the life of the young one, to me this seem absolutely unreasonable.. Not only cause you are deprecating how ppl think and feel but also cause you're excluding them from learning. To another point unless you wish to enstablish only a professional comunication some things are bound to happen, especially if somebody wish to be friends (relaxed conversations have also swears and/or talking about private matter), I don't know neither of the 2, and I don't even know if the girl who claim to be 16yo it is really so, so in this specific case I'm not taking the part of anyone and I'm doing just a simple logic thinking.
First of all why there are all these conversation recorded? Honestly this is my major concern right now.. it was a premeditated thing? To my knowledge recording started since the first time they speak, and they got immediately to sexual talk? To what I've heard it was pretty much generic stuff without a real context of grooming, however since I didn't watch the whole video I might be wrong, I mean is a bit too fishy..
The real question here is, what you would do in the same position? Do you really have to ask the age to a person the first time you speak to somebody or simply decide on the mood and maturity of the conversation? If this one say is underage do you cut off the contact without regards of the connection? Just asking.. I mean.. You should already know that on f95 there are plenty of underage right? xD
Eh.. one of the many fucked situation that neither law nor moral cover, so feel free to open a debate..
If you suspect the guy of irl grooming, then call the cops. This stupid court of public opinion thing needs to die in a fire.I know most of us here are no-life loser degenerates, but holy shit are we so far gone as to make up justifications for irl grooming? Are you seriously trying to argue "age doesn't matter, maturity does"?
no, i'm trying to argue that women never mature, but they do get uglierI know most of us here are no-life loser degenerates, but holy shit are we so far gone as to make up justifications for irl grooming? Are you seriously trying to argue "age doesn't matter, maturity does"?
Sorry for the late response, I mostly ignore this thread like I ignore the actual Yandere game.I wouldn't say I that I'm very self-aware, but if you're going around f95 cancelling games for being immoral then I would genuinely question whether you would pass a mirror test.
I would say "what?!", but I don't actually care for your answer because it'll probably be a garbage take. You need a Rocky Balboa style self improvement montage.no, i'm trying to argue that women never mature, but they do get uglier
for me it's CUNNY
Far too long for what's available in the game, and since the latest allegations against the creator dropped progression actually moved backwards as numerous VAs and volunteers either left the project or revoked permission to use their assets.How long has this game been in development? Is it any closer to being finished?
I played the alpha in high school and I'm now going for my master's degree.How long has this game been in development? Is it any closer to being finished?
Alternatively, at least one mod thinks it's hella funny to have this thing here.It's because the mods (as in moderators) have the authority to approve the occasional non-sexual game completely arbitrarily. Which means that at least one mod is a yandev fanboy, so keep that in mind the next time someone accuses the mods of being narcissistic hypocrites who only want to abuse their power.