Which is the truth of the matter I was driving at.
Her being there is not the problem, for you, it's when she was introduced.
So why are you trying to tell me what I had already said in my first comment to begin with?
I don't like her because she wasn't really needed to begin with,
That literally what it all boils down to.
Well, that's entirely subjective, so I can't offer anything other than I don't think it would've made any difference if she'd been left until now, to be introduced.
What are we doing here again?
The point is quite clearly written.
You complained that the 2 members of the house, who were introduced before Yona, had not had full sex with the MC yet.
The point is that it's completely understandable & justifiable, as to why not. I'm sorry you failed to understand.
I' sorry you fail to tell the difference between a complaint and a statement of fact. The complaint (if i was actually trying to complain that is) if you want to point something out is that it just delayed stories. I"m not going to cry a river over it or anything, I was simply answering an open question.
Because you said she wasn't really needed to begin with.
Because she isn't, that is an opinion, my opinion. My other opinion, Noami is the worst character, Rae is best character and ly is second best and thats because we are finally going into her sub role. If it wasn't for that Cait would be the second best.
best girl argument beginning in 3...2...1...
So I explained that the dev might have wanted to include another kink, via another girl, meaning she was needed, from the dev's perspective.
You being unable to see it, does not mean it does not exist.
And you're making assumptions again no what you were doing was assuming more to what I was actually saying and arguing against it. I answered a question, you made one point that actually correlated to what I said then went off onto something that had nothing to do with what I said, and now try to go "see I'm trying to make you see what you already see and you don't see" as if you made some great breakthrough on something I said.... something I first said when she was first revealed because i was giving my clarification to what I meant. Because yet again with the exception of my first sentence I can give you that looking at it again I should've better clarified my point, I've actually didn't say anything directly about the character itself. I don't care for her. And just to correlate your last little point, she can be wtfe fetish the dev wants her to be... its not going to magically make me go, oh i should care about this character right now. Does that mean my opinion on the character won't change in the future? No, maybe it will and maybe it won't. But we aren't in the future, we are in the present and I answered the question using the present knowledge of the character not based on what may happen.
