- Oct 8, 2023
- 240
- 3,245
Wow, in my opinion your version of Sophia is most similar to the L&P's original from update 0.190.Sharing my first DAZ image. After a long learning curve, finally managed to have a descent Sophia.
Feel free to point out what could / should be improved.
View attachment 3259235
View attachment 3259235 View attachment 3259245 View attachment 3259246 View attachment 3259248
It's like i can't even believe that someone could finally get so close to the original.
Last edited:
look goodSharing my first DAZ image. After a long learning curve
Feel free to point out what could / should be improved.
View attachment 3259235
View attachment 3259235 View attachment 3259245 View attachment 3259246 View attachment 3259248
seems we're all getting very close to creating Sophia now. No need to wait for a favor from LP just need to see her with different angles and expressions
Last edited:
Hi ,can you share .duf file?Sharing my first DAZ image. After a long learning curve
Feel free to point out what could / should be improved.
View attachment 3259235
View attachment 3259235 View attachment 3259245 View attachment 3259246 View attachment 3259248
That looks very good. Feels like you got her face, expression and skin to a very good point.Sharing my first DAZ image. After a long learning curve
Feel free to point out what could / should be improved.
View attachment 3259235
View attachment 3259235 View attachment 3259245 View attachment 3259246 View attachment 3259248
Two things I would mention:
1. what is that line down the middle of her nose? Just the lighting or something else. It also makes her nose look a little crooked to the side, not sure if it's just an optical illusion.
2. her head looks a little small compared to the rest of her body, I would try making it a little bigger.
- Dec 18, 2017
- 110
- 110
ops, my bad.
- Jul 23, 2017
- 47
- 2,596
Thanks for the feedback.
For the nose, I do have an issue on the tip which was accentuated by the lightning.
And for the head, I think you are right. I was so focused on head details that I did not check the most obvious.
The lates version of AWAM the sofa scene is incredible in terms of light can we interpret it together?
Last edited:
- Jul 20, 2019
- 8,745
- 17,103
Who is that you've got in Emma's spot?
EDIT:
Or Ethan's rather. Since Emma has switched classes at this point
Last edited:
- Mar 19, 2019
- 1,001
- 2,149
it turned out great, could you share duf the file with her?Sharing my first DAZ image. After a long learning curve
Feel free to point out what could / should be improved.
View attachment 3259235
View attachment 3259235 View attachment 3259245 View attachment 3259246 View attachment 3259248
- May 13, 2023
- 47
- 828
- Sep 27, 2017
- 835
- 2,608
One of the most faithfull copies. Can you put it into the scene though? Maybe try to dress her up and put in neutral scene for a start...Sharing my first DAZ image. After a long learning curve
Feel free to point out what could / should be improved.
View attachment 3259235
View attachment 3259235 View attachment 3259245 View attachment 3259246 View attachment 3259248
- Apr 12, 2017
- 584
- 975
Nowhere in my post did I say spoilers were mandatory. The whole point of my message was to say that hiding something inside a spoiler is only useful if the viewer is told what the spoiler is hiding so they can make an informed decision to unmask or not unmask said content.
That said, yes, in my personal opinion there are times when common courtesy suggests that a spoiler would be a good addition. When people post overly high resolution images or lots of images within a single post a spoiler is courteous to not swamp people with lower bandwidth. Some topics are known to be argument instigators. Most people who aren't living under a rock have reasonable guesses as to which images these will be. If a poster expects that their image likely is controversial then labeling and masking it is also a courtesy. Not only does it let the viewer opt-in or out, but it often keeps arguments like this one that I interrupted with my post on "how to use a spoiler" from ever starting in the first place.
Only leaving thumbnails in the post can often work in both the above cases as well (so long as the appropriate "warning" is there for people to opt-in or not). And yes, viewers do win when they get to opt-out of something they did not want to see. And yes, artists/posters also win when viewers who don't like their theme opt themselves out of the viewership.
There is no perfect solution. The world is a mess of trade-offs. Always is. Always will be. But your claim that everyone loses if some thread images find their way inside spoilers from time to time is overly dramatic. Woe the end of days!