this argument is pointless. like you said you can't make spoilers mandatory. you can't force the artists to use spoilers. it is their choice, not ours.Nowhere in my post did I say spoilers were mandatory. The whole point of my message was to say that hiding something inside a spoiler is only useful if the viewer is told what the spoiler is hiding so they can make an informed decision to unmask or not unmask said content.
That said, yes, in my personal opinion there are times when common courtesy suggests that a spoiler would be a good addition. When people post overly high resolution images or lots of images within a single post a spoiler is courteous to not swamp people with lower bandwidth. Some topics are known to be argument instigators. Most people who aren't living under a rock have reasonable guesses as to which images these will be. If a poster expects that their image likely is controversial then labeling and masking it is also a courtesy. Not only does it let the viewer opt-in or out, but it often keeps arguments like this one that I interrupted with my post on "how to use a spoiler" from ever starting in the first place.
Only leaving thumbnails in the post can often work in both the above cases as well (so long as the appropriate "warning" is there for people to opt-in or not). And yes, viewers do win when they get to opt-out of something they did not want to see. And yes, artists/posters also win when viewers who don't like their theme opt themselves out of the viewership.
There is no perfect solution. The world is a mess of trade-offs. Always is. Always will be. But your claim that everyone loses if some thread images find their way inside spoilers from time to time is overly dramatic. Woe the end of days!
Which one AI generator you use this art piece
this argument is pointless. like you said you can't make spoilers mandatory. you can't force the artists to use spoilers. it is their choice, not ours.
besides, choosing which kinks to place in spoilers will discriminate against said kinks. just remember that any kink is acceptable in this fan art thread because there are no kink tags listed top of the page. again it is all artists discretion.
and the way you people been bashing artists because you dislike their kinks, well you don't deserve their courtesy.
the point is moot with spoilers. spoiler all you want, if that's what you want to do. i understand your opinion.You don't have permission to view the spoiler content. Log in or register now.
Looks great to meSharing my first DAZ image. After a long learning curve, finally managed to have a descent Sophia.
Feel free to point out what could / should be improved.
View attachment 3259235
View attachment 3259235 View attachment 3259245 View attachment 3259246 View attachment 3259248
Put her in one of the in-game outfits and see how she looks. If we can tell little difference between yours and L&P's, then you know you have a winner. Especially if it's one of the in-game locationsSharing my first DAZ image. After a long learning curve, finally managed to have a descent Sophia.
Feel free to point out what could / should be improved.
View attachment 3259235
View attachment 3259235 View attachment 3259245 View attachment 3259246 View attachment 3259248
yes, try to replicate a scene, and if the result is good, you will be hired for the next dlcPut her in one of the in-game outfits and see how she looks. If we can tell little difference between yours and L&P's, then you know you have a winner. Especially if it's one of the in-game locations
He has to find out who we are first. He hasn't even threatened me yet, and I've published the most in depth list of the assets here. If I knew his PS workflow, or at least something similar, I'd publish that toono LP will sue him![]()
https://f95zone.to/threads/a-wife-and-mother-fan-art.15218/post-12661137Is there a genesis 8/9 female model for Sophia.
The below genesis 3 is no longer available
Sophia:
Character:
You must be registered to see the links
If L&P was to try and sue me, I imagine it would be as an accessory. I am putting a hell of a lot of effort in enabling people to copy his work.He won't do it. He will not threaten or sue you or anyone else for these actions for many reasons. Let's start with the most banal one: he doesn't have time for this shit and has no desire to spend his money and attention on it. To him, you're one of a thousand. He doesn't even know you exist. Plus, i don't even see any "corpus delicti" in your actions.
For example, what did you do? You specified the models of a toilet bowls, furniture, clothes, poses, hairstyles and all that stuff and indicated all of this in a list somewhere in here. So what? How will he sue you for this? Especially considering that all this assets probably was not even created by him.
Even if your images (renders) look like twins to his content, he won't sue you for it. However, if, for example, you began to sell your work using his pseudonym and your income would be high, then something would catch fire in his ass out of anger and he will he will notice your existence.
Shortly. Keep digging.