- Feb 26, 2019
- 977
- 13,182
- May 1, 2020
- 2,239
- 35,900
Everyone cums here to see big boobas guys, not to read long discussions about AI art. Keep this to the fan art only.
- May 13, 2023
- 56
- 1,119
Who will you choose?View attachment 4206723
- Dec 30, 2020
- 231
- 2,988
You don't have permission to view the spoiler content.
Log in or register now.
I look at this thread and think why don't more of you unite and redo the game from the beginning and where there would have been room for a scene, insert it. With so much technology, I don't think it would take more than half a year for the game to be redone from scratch. It can be a Fan Remake or whatever you want... so that there are no copyright problems... a common SubscribeStar so that you also have financial support, shared equally and that's about it.
- Jan 3, 2019
- 157
- 1,123
Anyone has the asset? Please help me identify her outfit and her bag..
Sounds reasonable but the devs with the most experience and best quality renders, as well as writers, have other personal projects going on as well as their own to make profits from.
New sophia did some changes can u guys point out flaws and good points ?
- Apr 10, 2021
- 469
- 3,823
Soften the cheekbones and Please reduce her breasts, just a tad. Most renders have Sophia packing anywhere from 36DDDs to 40Ds. The original model was busty but not That big. And this is not meant for you but someone, when doing body compositions, should make up a scale for bust, hips and thigh sizes. Meaning, 34B or 36C breasts, 36-inch hips, that sort of thing. Whereas the program gives you sizing by percentages, maybe corresponding measurements could be put in place that could make body proportions easier to identify and place for future rendering. Just a thought.
Last edited:
I like that the face is closer to the original EJ Adora used at the start of the game. My only gripe is the one that I have for most AI program works....Skin Sheen. The characters look like they're either oiled up or sweaty, in every rendition. Other than that issue, this is good stuff.
pick 1 or 2 to show openly, and put the rest in spoiler tags if there are too many.
good pic is a good pic, who care how it made
- Jan 3, 2019
- 157
- 1,123
I found her pants
You must be registered to see the links
But I can't find it free version to download. If anyone can help, please let me know..
can u tell me name of eyeliner & lipstick used ? also i am really struggling with eyes shape can u give me some tips if possible (i already tried image viewer but still)?Sharing my first DAZ image. After a long learning curve
Feel free to point out what could / should be improved.
View attachment 3259235
View attachment 3259235 View attachment 3259245 View attachment 3259246 View attachment 3259248
- Mar 25, 2020
- 37
- 1,692
I couldn't quite get the lighting I wanted.
- Jan 14, 2018
- 523
- 6,279
- Jul 14, 2019
- 311
- 238
The validity (or non-) of using AI in one's art requires at least an approachable concept (not necessarily a 'definition') of what '"ART" is or isn't. If that concept of validity can can be applied here at all, we must also acknowledge that - optimally - it should not be very dependent upon our own tastes in artistic expression. Are there, then, any boundaries to where 'art' may reside? Our interest in being a viewer or subscriber at F95 might be labeled as 'visual,' or 'graphic., but maybe we can detach ourselves from that momentarily and look at a different format that we might all acknowledge as a valid form of art.
We may or may not like reading poetry, but -- can it be said that a poem is at least one valid format for artistry - whether or not a given poem is written well? I think that most of us would acknowledge that it is. Perhaps one key element that could distinguish a 'poem' from other textual forms of expression is simply the intention of the writer. Another might be whether or not this piece of writing - at least in short form - generates a feeling or an image in your mind and does so concisely. What about rhyming? Lots of poetry features rhyming, but lots of it also doesn't. There are more complex elements that would need to be present for a poetry expert to acknowledge that a written work is truly a 'poem,' but we don't have to explore that.
Could a chat-bot INTEND to create a poem? Could it create a unique piece of writing that spontaneously generates an emotion or an image that wasn't directly fed into it's storage?
If we answer "yes," then presenting common, recognizable examples of this would be challenging. A "no" answer to those questions would seem to suggest that writing or imagery that's supplied by a machine may be beautiful or appealing to us, but classifying that as artistry MIGHT be invalid.