Currently sitting at 9.1 GBs, I don't think so. Just to explain: I'd have to get it broken down into parts, loaded up to a site at 2GB chunks, just to hear people complain about the size and that the pictures are in chronological order instead of grouped by artist. I've done things similar in the past (Big Brother), a couple of thumbs up, versus bucket load of complaints and in turn the artists that provided thier valuable time to create the content don't get the recognition they so richly deserve. Not worth it at all.