hzjujk

Well-Known Member
Sep 19, 2020
1,914
8,211
678
...
As for the Shota boys showing as well as they have - nothing says that L&P is not putting his thumb on the scales - it's not like any of us could prove that he did/did not do this.

He's already self-justifying why the Shota boys are getting content.
...
I assume you are referring to the current survey here.
Although you phrase it as vaguely as possible, you imply that L&P would/could manipulate the survey results in favor of his fetish. You write that nobody can prove anything, but I think you are smart enough to know that every (new) conspiracy theory starts with such formulations.
For some people here, all that will stick is - "L&P manipulates the survey results!".

And you immediately provide a pseudo-proof. Namely the statement from L&P, who I also know, that he finds this chain of events of the tutoring hot. I think after seven years of working on this game, pretty much every fetish wears off. And if he actually still finds the tutoring so super hot that he absolutely wants to share it with everyone in public, then he will do it regardless of any survey results - just as he has done so far.
And finally - the rule in this forum is that no one should be judged for their fetishes. Does this rule not apply to L&P?

Yours sincerely
hzjujk
 

tofhdns

Well-Known Member
Jan 25, 2021
1,715
4,115
387
I assume you are referring to the current survey here.
Although you phrase it as vaguely as possible, you imply that L&P would/could manipulate the survey results in favor of his fetish. You write that nobody can prove anything, but I think you are smart enough to know that every (new) conspiracy theory starts with such formulations.
For some people here, all that will stick is - "L&P manipulates the survey results!".

And you immediately provide a pseudo-proof. Namely the statement from L&P, who I also know, that he finds this chain of events of the tutoring hot. I think after seven years of working on this game, pretty much every fetish wears off. And if he actually still finds the tutoring so super hot that he absolutely wants to share it with everyone in public, then he will do it regardless of any survey results - just as he has done so far.
And finally - the rule in this forum is that no one should be judged for their fetishes. Does this rule not apply to L&P?

Yours sincerely
hzjujk
Although it is not directly related to the above, I bring it up because of what you said.

Until now, I had not raised much of an issue with the discrepancy between the total number of votes and the total number of members. (Patreon)
This is because I believe that the previous vote was the total number of cumulative votes over several years. (Even now.)

But this time the process is different from before. (At least, how to make it public.)

So I want to ask.

013627.png
This is a screenshot from the 22nd.
The number of active members on this day was 2,005. (I checked now and the final number is 2008.)
However, the total number of votes revealed on this day was 2513.
Why did this difference occur?

another one.

I once said that a strange phenomenon occurred where Carl's vote count was -1.
During this voting process, a phenomenon occurred where Mr. Murray's vote count was -1. (20 days compared to 17 days)
How is this possible?

(I'm not trying to raise a conspiracy theory, I'm just saying that the issue of credibility needs to be addressed.)
 

Kilrun25

Newbie
Dec 27, 2022
36
64
142
Although it is not directly related to the above, I bring it up because of what you said.

Until now, I had not raised much of an issue with the discrepancy between the total number of votes and the total number of members. (Patreon)
This is because I believe that the previous vote was the total number of cumulative votes over several years. (Even now.)

But this time the process is different from before. (At least, how to make it public.)

So I want to ask.

View attachment 3770538
This is a screenshot from the 22nd.
The number of active members on this day was 2,005. (I checked now and the final number is 2008.)
However, the total number of votes revealed on this day was 2513.
Why did this difference occur?

another one.

I once said that a strange phenomenon occurred where Carl's vote count was -1.
During this voting process, a phenomenon occurred where Mr. Murray's vote count was -1. (20 days compared to 17 days)
How is this possible?

(I'm not trying to raise a conspiracy theory, I'm just saying that the issue of credibility needs to be addressed.)
Or perhaps, for example I voted for 3 different story lines so you might be missing the fact the 2500 votes could be the same person voting for multiple stories, so you have 2008 paid patrons, if you voted for 2 stories that would count as 2 votes, majority of people, most likely voted for 1 storyline (their favourite) whereas others like multiple
 

tofhdns

Well-Known Member
Jan 25, 2021
1,715
4,115
387
Or perhaps, for example I voted for 3 different story lines so you might be missing the fact the 2500 votes could be the same person voting for multiple stories, so you have 2008 paid patrons, if you voted for 2 stories that would count as 2 votes, majority of people, most likely voted for 1 storyline (their favourite) whereas others like multiple
I'll ask you.

What you are saying is that one person has the right to three votes. that's right?
What you are saying is that one person can cast 3 votes for one character. that's right?
 

Dr.SigmundFap

Engaged Member
Apr 23, 2017
2,572
20,506
748
I'll ask you.

What you are saying is that one person has the right to three votes. that's right?
What you are saying is that one person can cast 3 votes for one character. that's right?
He's saying that one member can cast more than one character vote. So a member can vote for Dylan, Ellie, Patricia, Sam, Zac, and Aiden in the same vote. But the member can't cast multiple votes for the same character, unless they have multiple member accounts.
 
3.20 star(s) 561 Votes