Create and Fuck your AI Cum Slut –70% OFF
x

tofhdns

Well-Known Member
Jan 25, 2021
1,715
4,115
387
So the laws of the United States? in many countries you can't marry a relative, but you can in the US. Most of all, then the strangest is the law about rapists, when you get married you can't blame. In Europe, it seems that in all countries you go to prison and for a long time.

View attachment 3822767
083654.png
083852.png

10 years because it's weak.

You don't have permission to view the spoiler content. Log in or register now.
Occurs in 0.2% of the total population.
Banned or regulated in 32 states.
In some states, only if they are physically unable to conceive a child.
 

tofhdns

Well-Known Member
Jan 25, 2021
1,715
4,115
387
I was surprised when I translated this. In the US, marriage between first-degree relatives is prohibited in only 25 states?

Is America in the Middle Ages?

How is this possible?

Even in primitive tribal societies, inbreeding was avoided.
 

watermankaku

Active Member
Feb 6, 2021
512
526
217
He has now posted some more pictures on Twitter, trying to retain some customers. This shameless guy has long been accustomed to this scam. When he found that this website delayed his making money, he chose to report and complain. He has been cheating people from the beginning.
 

crabboid

Active Member
Sep 7, 2019
590
1,554
343
I was surprised when I translated this. In the US, marriage between first-degree relatives is prohibited in only 25 states?

Is America in the Middle Ages?

How is this possible?

Even in primitive tribal societies, inbreeding was avoided.
I have never heard of that in my life. I can say that I've lived in multiple states across the US in my life, and I've never once encountered a single human being who was blood relation to their spouse. To quote Norm Macdonald:

"That sounds like some commie gobbledygook to me."
 

ashitanojoe

Engaged Member
Oct 20, 2019
2,076
10,321
718
its weird that patreon loses a client that techincally follows the rules and earns them a good amount, I don't know how much he made monthly
it was Strange because the DOL version was the "safe version" and AWAM was outside of Patreon.they hate money.
You can't expect that Patreon send a message "Hey there is a link between AWAM and your Patreon page, we're busted! We made a lot of money but we can't close our eyes any longer, we're going to have trouble. Sorry dude, nothing personal, see you. Kindly."
Studio FOW was banned from Patreon after they made a bestiality scene. Studio FOW was one of the biggest patreons not only in adult games but overall, I think they had 17000 patrons at the very least. And still Patreon didn't care about losing that source of money. To put you into context, Studio FOW launched a Kickstarter campaing after that and they collected more than 2 million dollars for their new game, Subverse. They have earned more than 12 million dollars in Steam with that game. We are talking about Patreon banning a source of millions of dollars, a dev like L&P means nothing compared to that. Patreon has made an statement, they will ban any dev that violates their norms, no matter how much money he brings.
 

Alley_Cat

Devoted Member
Jul 20, 2019
9,126
17,789
869
Studio FOW was banned from Patreon after they made a bestiality scene. Studio FOW was one of the biggest patreons not only in adult games but overall, I think they had 17000 patrons at the very least. And still Patreon didn't care about losing that source of money. To put you into context, Studio FOW launched a Kickstarter campaing after that and they collected more than 2 million dollars for their new game, Subverse. They have earned more than 12 million dollars in Steam with that game. We are talking about Patreon banning a source of millions of dollars, a dev like L&P means nothing compared to that. Patreon has made an statement, they will ban any dev that violates their norms, no matter how much money he brings.
Or, to put another way, Patreon soothsayers are getting more money from others not liking things like this 2nd side job, than they are from the few hundred fans of it.
 

palmtrees89

Engaged Member
Jul 3, 2021
2,225
14,003
637
Everything is conjecture when it comes to Patreon. They obviously talk about AWAM in the message uploaded.

The question is why AWAM is now a problem when it wasn't in last years. The previous review from Patreon was specifically about the F95 link. The link was removed, the page got back to business. The link came back, the page was banned. Make the math.

You can't expect that Patreon send a message "Hey there is a link between AWAM and your Patreon page, we're busted! We made a lot of money but we can't close our eyes any longer, we're going to have trouble. Sorry dude, nothing personal, see you. Kindly."
Didn't Patreon update their ToS a while ago? I've seen a bunch of games getting in trouble with Patreon lately, so maybe it was just L&P's turn. Saying that because you question as to why AWAM was suddenly a problem.

Another thing I find confusing.. You say L&P can't expect a message from Patreon about the link, but then you also say the review before his ban was specifically about that link. So he must have gotten the message you say L&P can't expect from Patreon during their first rodeo, otherwise how would he know the link on F95 was the problem?

AWAM is being shared on a bunch of pirate websites, and there's links to his Patreon page on all of them. The game itself is linked to his Patreon page aswell.

Man, it's really annoying that I've missed out on all the "fun" when apparently DM's and whatnot had been posted here. Which is also weird that they've all been deleted for some reason. I've still not seen any DM or screenshot from L&P and Patreon that prove the first review was specifically about the link on F95. It's just what people have been saying, and I hate having to blindly believe what's said by random people. The only thing I've seen is an E-mail after his perma ban that clearly shows how Patreon doesn't like incest and shota and the screenshot from L&P's Discord provided by PietruccioTheHilander where L&P "assumes" the ban happened because of a link.
 
3.20 star(s) 560 Votes