VN Ren'Py A Wife and Mother [P2 v0.230a + P1 v0.152] [Lust & Passion]

[You Don't See Me]

This isn't an AWAM thread, it's Pink Floyd's "Wall". Where some are intent on being "bricks".
"We don't need no education. We don't need no thought control." "HEY, TEACHERS! LEAVE THEM KIDS ALONE." JMHO

You must be registered to see the links

 

[nexer]

Interesting discussion, but you are moving away from the new Progress line promoted by Biden and Trudeau. The new Progress line promotes inclusive, gender-neutral language.
So, excuse me, but English discriminates, separating by gender.

 

[Bernardo Cempoaltecátl]

Interesting discussion, but you are moving away from the new Progress line promoted by Biden and Trudeau. The new Progress line promotes inclusive, gender-neutral language.
So, excuse me, but English discriminates, separating by gender.

Keep your progressive communist. political views to yourself. We don't need them in our games.

 

[ashitanojoe]

Ok, I respect Walt Whitman, one of the greatest American poets. Look this sentence from his poem 'Song of Myself, 48':

"And whoever walks a furlong without sympathy walks to his own
funeral drest in his shroud."

Would you prefer something like:

"And whoever walks a furlong without sympathy walks to his/her own
funeral drest in his/her shroud."

Or

"And whoever walks a furlong without sympathy walks to his or her own
funeral drest in his or her shroud."

In the middle of a poem? Really?

And If you write: "And whoever walks a furlong without sympathy walks to their own"
Is not that bad grammar?

I'm asking. No need to be rude.

 

[Dr.SigmundFap]

Ok, I respect Walt Whitman, one of the greatest American poets. Look this sentence from his poem 'Song of Myself, 48':

"And whoever walks a furlong without sympathy walks to his own
funeral drest in his shroud."

Would you prefer something like:

"And whoever walks a furlong without sympathy walks to his/her own
funeral drest in his/her shroud."

Or

"And whoever walks a furlong without sympathy walks to his or her own
funeral drest in his or her shroud."

In the middle of a poem? Really?

And If you write: "And whoever walks a furlong without sympathy walks to their own"
Is not that bad grammar?

I'm asking. No need to be rude.

I think you're making this a little bit more complicated than what it is.

"And whoever walks a furlong without sympathy walks to his own
funeral drest in his shroud."

The author has already identified the gender in this sentence, and he is conveying that the gender is male in his poem. Now let's go back to your previous example of "They." I think this is the best way to describe this word in a sentence with a definition.

Spoiler: They

You don't have permission to view the spoiler content. Log in or register now.

Picture you're outside of a store, and you and someone with you see a person in the store, but you don't know the gender. One of you may tell the other to go see if they may help you. Once you know the gender, you can use the word he or she.

 

[ashitanojoe]

I think you're making this a little bit more complicated than what it is.

"And whoever walks a furlong without sympathy walks to his own
funeral drest in his shroud."

The author has already identified the gender in this sentence, and he is conveying that the gender is male in his poem. Now let's go back to your previous example of "They." I think this is the best way to describe this word in a sentence with a definition.

Spoiler: They

You don't have permission to view the spoiler content. Log in or register now.

Picture you're outside of a store and you and someone with you see a person in the store but you don't know the gender. One of you may tell the other to go see if they may help you. Once you know the gender, you can used the word he or she.

Oh no, he is clearly referring to all the people, he isn't referring to a single person, he is talking about everybody, every gender.

My question about your example is that if this is a new way of speaking? Or you have used 'they' in that context always, since centuries ago?

 

[Dr.SigmundFap]

Oh no, he is clearly referring to all the people, he isn't referring to a single person, he is talking about everybody, every gender.

My question about your example is that if this is a new way of speaking? Or you have used 'they' in that context always, from centuries ago.

I'll have to read the poem again, but no this isn't a new way of speaking. This has been around for years. It's just that the context of the word is mostly used in group settings.

 

[ashitanojoe]

I'll have to read the poem again, but no this isn't a new way of speaking. This has been around for years. It's just that the context of the word is mostly used in group settings.

The thing is that your example is correct but it's different than the topic we were talking about. In this context you are referring to a somebody in a place that doesn't belong to you. So, yes, you can say look if they can help you, because at the same time you are talking about 'the customers' or the 'employees' of that store, even if you are pointing to only one person. You are referring more to the 'status' of someone than the person himself.

But when you talk about a specific person, despite of not knowing the gender, you are refering to the 'self', to the qualities that make that person unique: in this case the dev of AWAM. In this context using 'they' sounds wrong to me. Something different would be for example writing in this thread: Why they never upload the games faster? In that case you are talking about all the slower erotic games devs but no specifically to L&P.

I don't know if I was able to make my point.

 

[Dr.SigmundFap]

The thing is that your example is correct but it's different than the topic we were talking about. In this context you are referring to a somebody in a place that doesn't belong to you. So, yes, you can say look if they can help you, because at the same time you are talking about 'the customers' or the 'employees' of that store, even if you are pointing to only one person. You are referring more to the 'status' of someone than the person himself.

But when you talk about a specific person, despite of not knowing the gender, you are refering to the 'self', to the qualities that make that person unique: in this case the dev of AWAM. In this context using 'they' sounds wrong to me. Something different would be for example writing in this thread: Why they never upload the games faster? In that case you are talking about all the slower erotic games devs but no specifically to L&P.

I don't know if I was able to make my point.

I'll send you a message. I think we're beyond off-topic now.

 

[nexer]

Keep your progressive communist. political views to yourself. We don't need them in our games.

Don't be rude. We have a strong lesbian current in this forum demanding more scenes of this type, I would say only of this type. And this current has progressive components.
To my surprise, the same ones who correct grammar gender mistakes (his/her) in English.
So, ...

 

[Bernardo Cempoaltecátl]

Don't be rude. We have a strong lesbian current in this forum demanding more scenes of this type, I would say only of this type. And this current has progressive components.
To my surprise, the same ones who correct grammar gender mistakes (his/her) in English.
So, ...

Ok sorry if I sounded rude , but my point is : we don't need to be concerned about who gets offended with our use or lack thereof words that are not politically correct or "inclusive" or "gender neutral" in our games. We have enough thought police and grammar and speech Nazis in real life , we don't need it in our games. Freedom of speech should not be regulated by anyone , and that includes the words we want to use (as long as they are not direct personal insults to someone or calls of violence against someone or a group of people) regardless of who gets offended. Just saying.

 

[Dr.SigmundFap]

Ok sorry if I sounded rude , but my point is : we don't need to be concerned about who gets offended with our use or lack thereof words that are not politically correct or "inclusive" or "gender neutral" in our games. We have enough thought police and grammar and speech Nazis in real life , we don't need it in our games. Freedom of speech should not be regulated by anyone , and that includes the words we want to use regardless of who gets offended. Just saying.

Freedom of speech isn't the issue here. Everyone here can speak their minds however they feel like it. However, using the correct sentence structure and words does make your point and cases about a topic stronger, and it keeps people from scratching their heads trying to figure out what you mean. But I do understand your point that too much "Grammar Policing" could be annoying.

 

[Deleted member 3325933]

Their, there, they're.

To, too, and two is worse for most non-native speakers.

Also, only in English is this a grammatically correct sentence:

You must be registered to see the links

Mods- please don't delete this, just be happy we aren't attacking one another in our endless wait for the next update.

I cannot remember the author but, there is a book, in German, that is 100 pages long ...... 1 sentence. The entire purpose of the author was to show it could be done. IF I remember correctly it was pre-ww2 time frame. Dang, when do you take a breath?

 

[Deleted member 3325933]

The auto-correct can do wonders too...
In one of my post boobs becomes “boba” (what’s even a boba...?)

Fett! Boba Fett, Jango Fett, They are Mandolorians!

 

[Deleted member 3325933]

Ok sorry if I sounded rude , but my point is : we don't need to be concerned about who gets offended with our use or lack thereof words that are not politically correct or "inclusive" or "gender neutral" in our games. We have enough thought police and grammar and speech Nazis in real life , we don't need it in our games. Freedom of speech should not be regulated by anyone , and that includes the words we want to use (as long as they are not direct personal insults to someone or calls of violence against someone or a group of people) regardless of who gets offended. Just saying.

Of course the call to violence rule is waived for Bennett or Aiden. Just Sayin!

 

[Deleted member 3325933]

Interesting discussion, but you are moving away from the new Progress line promoted by Biden and Trudeau. The new Progress line promotes inclusive, gender-neutral language.
So, excuse me, but English discriminates, separating by gender.

And other languages don't. Gimmie a break. German is full of feminine, masculine, and neutral (or is it neutered). How many others fit that bill.

 

[Deleted member 3325933]

I think you're making this a little bit more complicated than what it is.

"And whoever walks a furlong without sympathy walks to his own
funeral drest in his shroud."

The author has already identified the gender in this sentence, and he is conveying that the gender is male in his poem. Now let's go back to your previous example of "They." I think this is the best way to describe this word in a sentence with a definition.

Spoiler: They

You don't have permission to view the spoiler content. Log in or register now.

Picture you're outside of a store, and you and someone with you see a person in the store, but you don't know the gender. One of you may tell the other to go see if they may help you. Once you know the gender, you can use the word he or she.

Since we have clearly wandered into the "Who knows what" zone. According to the current concepts pushed by the 'mental health experts' vice empirical science you will not know someones gender until you ask them. There is no easy visual reference, audio reference, or physical clues (Hair, clothing, makeup, etc...) that will provide the answer. And fluidity means it could change while you are standing there. And yes I have seen that game. Apparently, Mr Darwin did not know shit!

 

[nexer]

And other languages don't. Gimmie a break. German is full of feminine, masculine, and neutral (or is it neutered). How many others fit that bill.

Right. Fuck all this languages . I will use from now on: his pussy and her dick.
However, there is a language without gender differences. Hungarian.
I'm sure we have a Hungarian here to confirm.

 

[Chekotay]

Right. Fuck all this languages . I will use from now on: his pussy and her dick.
However, there is a language without gender differences. Hungarian.
I'm sure we have a Hungarian here to confirm.
View attachment 1190935

Igen van

 

[Френсис]

Antonio did

antonio is that parin from the beginning of the club where sofia was with her sister and daughter right? This scene in this version huh?