3.20 star(s) 567 Votes

dan_roger69

Well-Known Member
Donor
Dec 1, 2021
1,613
5,397
688
I guess you're right, and it's sad. But I must say there are a lot of people who like it. That is, each product has its own audience. The big question for me is, does the author like the result of the work done?:unsure: I would like to know his frank, honest answer.
You should ask the author L&P about it in Discord/Subscribestar or boosty.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Luis2008 and Bane71

Gunizz

Well-Known Member
Aug 9, 2017
1,276
3,479
498
I disagree. Being a Dik outperforms this game in EVERY aspect.
Please let's be honest. I love BaD and I think that overall is a great VN. But BaD graphics are crap compared to AWAM. The eroticism in BaD is totally absent. It's a lot funny to play and I spend days with each new release, but it's not better than AWAM in every aspect.

I also don't understand what is the purpose of filling pages with complains. I mean of you don't like a VN just don't play it, there is plenty of games here. It's really boring to read constant complainers. I love teasing and slow burn, I get the game for free, I don't care if other people don't like it, it's just annoying to have all these useless comments.
 

doccop63

Engaged Member
Oct 16, 2022
3,319
4,570
438
Please let's be honest. I love BaD and I think that overall is a great VN. But BaD graphics are crap compared to AWAM. The eroticism in BaD is totally absent. It's a lot funny to play and I spend days with each new release, but it's not better than AWAM in every aspect.

I also don't understand what is the purpose of filling pages with complains. I mean of you don't like a VN just don't play it, there is plenty of games here. It's really boring to read constant complainers. I love teasing and slow burn, I get the game for free, I don't care if other people don't like it, it's just annoying to have all these useless comments.
The "useless" comments that you speak of wouldn't exist if the dev was doing right. People don't complain if a product is out when promised and is viable. If you've noticed, MANY of the complaints are about timeliness, some others about the content and Rightfully so. People wouldn't mind a long wait if the content was worthwhile but it Hasn't been. Since boycotting (and That's what you want people to do) isn't working, complaining is a way to force the issue. The idea is that, if you get Enough complaints to the Right people (meaning the actual Paying customers and some of Those have Stopped paying and are complaining) then Hopefully the Dev will change his erratic and willfully fraudulent actions. My thoughts for you is to take your own advice. If you don't want to read the thread, Ignore it and just follow the dev on his paysite.
 
  • Heart
  • Like
Reactions: Woobs1 and Kakato

ffive

Devoted Member
Jun 19, 2022
10,438
25,781
988
But BaD graphics are crap compared to AWAM.
That's objectively silly statement to make, between the fact both these games use the same models, assets and renderer, and AWAM turning into AI slop factory.
 

FickenPlayen

Newbie
Oct 19, 2024
31
71
54
Okay, I was reeeaaaally enjoying this game... until the later chapters when the creator started using AI for dialogue. It is particularly obvious in the theater scene. "His voice curled around her like smoke." "The part that ached, that burned." "Torn between pushing him away and pulling him closer." "Every step had been a surrender, a slow unraveling of her resistance." "The slick evidence of her own arousal." Eyes/gazes darkening. Breaths hitching. And the emdashes! So many emdashes. "Sofia's [sic] lips parted - whether in protest or anticipation, she wasn't sure." "The way he looked at her - like she was the only thing in the world worth seeing - ..." "The way he looked at her - like she was something sacred, something his - sent a fresh wave ..." "The way he said it - like a vow, a promise - made her shiver."

FUCK! UGGHHHH. I'm barely even scratching the surface. It hits all of the cheesy AI trash trademarks in one scene, just one line after the other, an endless barrage of AI sex speak out of fucking nowhere. The whiplash is nuts. It's awful and completely clashes with the rest of the writing style, which isn't perfect but is at least authentic and HOT, unlike this cliched garbage. It's incredibly disappointing, especially this far into the game. If this is the new norm, I'll unfortunately have to say goodbye to this until-now-wonderful experience. PLEASE DON'T DO THIS TO YOUR GAME MR. AUTHOR

EDIT: ...aaaaand reading through the latest comments, I appear not to be the only one upset at this. It's good to know I'm not alone. Gonna leave this here as another voice expressing frustration, but yeah, feel free to ignore my outburst.
 

FickenPlayen

Newbie
Oct 19, 2024
31
71
54
That's objectively silly statement to make, between the fact both these games use the same models, assets and renderer, and AWAM turning into AI slop factory.
Eh, I agree with them. BaD has a lot of "Daz face" going on. Hot bodies, but faces residing in the uncanny valley. Bizarre-looking mouths everywhere. AWAM manages to avoid the Daz curse, and it's clear L&P put significantly more time and effort into creating a unique style for his renders.
 

asprin33

Member
Mar 12, 2018
100
70
247
Eh, I agree with them. BaD has a lot of "Daz face" going on. Hot bodies, but faces residing in the uncanny valley. Bizarre-looking mouths everywhere. AWAM manages to avoid the Daz curse, and it's clear L&P put significantly more time and effort into creating a unique style for his renders.
BaD Which game's abbreviation?
 

Gunizz

Well-Known Member
Aug 9, 2017
1,276
3,479
498
The "useless" comments that you speak of wouldn't exist if the dev was doing right. People don't complain if a product is out when promised and is viable. If you've noticed, MANY of the complaints are about timeliness, some others about the content and Rightfully so. People wouldn't mind a long wait if the content was worthwhile but it Hasn't been. Since boycotting (and That's what you want people to do) isn't working, complaining is a way to force the issue. The idea is that, if you get Enough complaints to the Right people (meaning the actual Paying customers and some of Those have Stopped paying and are complaining) then Hopefully the Dev will change his erratic and willfully fraudulent actions. My thoughts for you is to take your own advice. If you don't want to read the thread, Ignore it and just follow the dev on his paysite.
I actually liked the last updates. I have been playing this game just for a year so I probably don't share the frustration of others, but I like eroticism and teasing. I am not looking for simple penetration scenes, there is plenty of that in real porn. I use VNs to get turned on so this VN is actually perfect, apart from the latest excessive use of AI in some renderings and some narrative text that feels not right.
That's objectively silly statement to make, between the fact both these games use the same models, assets and renderer, and AWAM turning into AI slop factory.
Not really the same assets and DAZ assets can be heavily customised too. Apart from that, L&P is more skilled and takes more care to pose correctly each rendering. The lightening, the surfaces, skin textures, clothes are more refined in AWAM. His characters are more persistent in their shapes (apart Sophia's legs and Dylan growing up for anti-censorship reasons).

DPC just mass produces, he's a beast for that, he's able to produce a massive quantity of renderings aiming at an average quality. He is a very clever business man. Many characters change aspect from one release to the other.
L&P is more focused on image quality. I understand many people are not able to detect apple from oranges and they have no ability to detect even the biggest posing errors, but that doesn't change the reality many of us can notice.
 

xxxorro

Active Member
Jan 18, 2021
886
12,801
668
Here is the unpack of the v0.230a

Technical info

The first part of the museum date event consists of 288 renders, 7 animations and 12 pages of script. This first part is already the 11th event in term of number of renders:
1767039173029.png
The whole event is likely to double the number or renders, reaching at least 500 and climbing to at least 4th place.

How to get the event

The event requires day21_Sophia_meets_museum_guys_with_Patricia from the workout scene in v0.230, i.e. Sophia agreeing to meet the museum guys while on the phone with Patricia. This, in turn, required jason_haru_phonenumber from PD 2 when there was the choice to exchange the numbers with the guys.

As expected, the event can be played whether or not Sophia/Dylan's path is open, with the exception of the romantic path, in which Sophia calls Patricia to cancel while they go to the movie theater.


The choices

The choices are pretty straightforward, it is fundamental that Sophia drinks the booze in Pat's car (day21_Sophia_took_drank_booze_in_Pats_car), otherwise the first lewd decision on how to react to Haru behind her (day21_Sophia_reacted_cool_on_Haru_behind_her) is not available. All the subsequent choices are indeed chained to the previous ones and prevents the following ones if the previous ones are not selected.

The only choice that at the moment seems to have no effect is Sophia taking the lead in explaining the first lesson (day21_Sophia_told_boys_first_lession). We'll see if it will have any effect in the second part.

Note that at the moment there is a little bug that allows to go directly into the filthy path even if Sophia didn't reacted cool on Haru in the narrow passage. This will be fixed in the next update.

Up to this moment and contrary to previous events, the variables concerning recent sex with Liam (
day16_Sophia_had_sex_with_Liam , day19_Sophia_had_sex_with_Liam_at_his_workplace, day18_Sophia_Liam_had_sex_on_day18) are not used to prevent lewd choice. We'll see if they will come into play in the second part.

The Museum Guys

It turned out that the meeting was shadier than expected. The guys lied about several things to convince Sophia to go with them to the museum after hours.

1. During the meeting in PD 2 Jason mentioned that his dad knew the museum owner and could arrange a visit. Sophia seemed the one to be skeptical from the beginning, already mentioning it to Patricia in the car:
Python:
"Sophia frowned. 'A museum tour at 10 pm? Are you sure about this? I mean, one of them's dad supposedly knows the owner? I don't know.'"
And she was also the one trying to investigate the matter once inside the museum:
Python:
s "So, and you said your uncle or dad work here? Or how else does he know the museum director?"
ja "Uh... yeah, maintenance. A real art lover, though. Always telling us about the pieces."
Only to find out that they were actually breaking in and there was no dad or uncle and that they have been scouting the place as cleaning staff at night to prepare the break-in.

2. During the initial meeting in PD 2 Haru mentioned that Jason was the star quarterback of the college football team.
Python:
ja "Pretty good. Our football team, the San Alejo Eagles, might win the division championship this year!"
p "Really? That's awesome! Go Eagles! Do you play?"
ha "Does he play? He's the star quarterback!"
ja "Um... I think simply quarterback is enough!"
ha "He's too humble!"
p "Quarterback? For real? It just keeps getting better! Sorry, but aren't you a little short for being a quarterback?"
In the break room we instead discover that he is part of the swimming team.
You don't have permission to view the spoiler content. Log in or register now.
Probably this was another effort to impress the girls with the usual quarterback cliché.

3. They try to lie about their ages when confronted by Patricia
You don't have permission to view the spoiler content. Log in or register now.

4. Not exactly a lie but during the visit they try to downplay their inexperience by acting confident and in control of the situation. The first crack appear with the van gogh section, for which they provided some lousy excuse to avoid it. They finally came clean, admitting that they were completely inexperienced and that the visit was an excuse to gain experience with older women.
This was a bit of an unexpected turn, which moved the whole event again in the direction of sex-ed, which is largely explored in the others paths (indoubtely with a quite different take here).


The sisters

The premises of the event have been respected. Patricia is the one leading the event, while Sophia is as usual more hesitant, at least at the beginning, only to follow her lead during the lessons in the break room.

On the other hand, we can see that, differently than previous events, Sophia is more conscious about the possibility that the date is not just about art. From her choice of dress to her makeup, she is reminded who she was before marriage and motherhood ("a muscle memory of who she used to be before carpools and PTA meetings became her evening entertainment.")

We already saw in the recap post that there was an interesting parallel if not a déjà vu when Sophia meets Patricia outside the house. The dialogs and even some poses are very similar to the ones of Sam's concert.
Another powerful moment is the pact the sisters make in the car before meeting the guys:
Python:
p "One more thing. If you ever wanna bail, we bail. No explanations."
p "I might be a homewrecker, but not a kidnapper. *Smirk*"
"When Sophia's left hand found Patrica's, their two gold wedding bands click together—softly and deliberately, like tiny church bells tolling a secret rebellion."
"As the metal grazed Sophia's knuckle, it felt like a tiny vow being simultaneously forged and broken — a silent promise that whatever unfolds within the museum will be weighed against the significance of both their marriages, ounce for ounce."
s "I'm not gonna bail. I'll remember the feeling of being looked at like I'm the exhibit."
p "Then let's go make some little tour guides stare. *Grin*"
This is a powerful moment because it shows how both sisters are aware of the consequences of their actions and the risk they are taking. The pact reinforces the connection between them. Patricia have been portrayed as the wilder one ever since her young age, while Sophia had at least to give up her younger self to embrace the role of wife and mother. Patricia has been pushing Sophia to rediscover that side of herself ever since they reconnect in San Alejo. And at least in this event she seems to be willing to go down that road ("I'll remember the feeling of being looked at like I'm the exhibit.")

The image of the wedding rings clicking together is also very symbolic, as the pact for this adventure is weighed against their marital commitments. And one cannot help to think it is a nod at the famous scene from Thelma & Louise (obviously without the tragic ending and in a completely different context).

1766226559911.png
1766226680018.png


Another interesting aspect of this event is the dynamic between the sisters and the boys. Patricia is clearly the more experienced and dominant one, taking the lead in instructing the guys. Sophia, though still hesitant, has some moments of assertiveness, playing on her teacher role.
She intervenes to establish the second of the there rules for the lessons ("You do exactly what we tell you. Nothing more, nothing less.")
And as mentioned before, in the break room Sophia can take the lead in explaining the first lesson.

The whole dynamic with the guys plays on the exhilarating feeling of being in control and having power over the younger and inexperienced. And indeed, contrary to almost all previous events, there is no trace of the usual sign of arousal or lust during the four lessons. It is only mentioned once at the beginning that the booze and the ambiance made them horny. This is a departure from the usual formula of the other events, at least for this first part. However it seems to fit the theme of the event, power and control.

Finally, so far we had 4 lessons.
1. Undressing the guys
2. Patience with the rule of not touching unless told
3. "It's all about rhythm and pressure."
4. "This is where we distinguish boys and men." which is then interrupted by the security guard.

We can imagine that, whatever the resolution of the cliffhanger will be, the lessons will be resumed in the second part. Since lesson 4 would have been one of the sexual practice not yet explored in the filthy path with Sophia (blowjob), it is also probable that there will a be (a least) a 5th lesson for the second announced sexual practice not yet explored (see below).


The cliffhanger
It could not be a proper event without the usual interruption at the topical moment, with a cliffhanger leading to the second part .

It has been noted that there is a strange jump from the moment the sisters decides to go on with lesson 4 to the moment they are interrupted by the security guard.
The positions of the boys suddenly change. They are now lying on the couch instead of the glass table.
1766579820180.png 1766576013559.png
It may be an oversight or a missing sentence in the text to explain the change of position. Perhaps the rush to finish the last renders before the release left no time to create additional renders for the transition.

What is also a bit curious (without going completely in plot theory mode) is that L&P used the 3 renders of them getting caught in the reverse order.
Usually the renders are shown in order according their sequence number. Here instead the are shown in reverse order, from 294 to 291:
Python:
scene day21_11_museum_night 289
"Patricia exchanged a final look with her sister, seeing her own decision reflected in her eyes."
p "Then I suppose we can begin..."
stop music fadeout 1.4
scene day21_11_museum_night 290
"Suddenly,..."
scene day21_11_museum_night 294 with hpunch
"...the door bursted open with a loud click as the lock disengaged."
scene day21_11_museum_night 293
"Immediately, a harsh flashlight beam cut through the intimate darkness, illuminating the scene."
scene day21_11_museum_night 292
"All four of them froze like deer caught in headlights, the beam illuminating a scene that would have made Renaissance painters blush: two elegant women, topless and kneeling, their hands still wrapped around two young men who sat on the couch both in their birthday suits."
"The soft lamplight that had seemed so romantic moments before now felt like stage lighting for their mortification."
scene day21_11_museum_night 291
xm "What the..."
This is curious, but there's probably not much to read into it. It may just be an oversight due to the rush and his personal life events.

Another interesting detail is that, under the flash of the security guard's flashlight, we can see that they are both about to start blowing the guys. In all previous lessons, Sophia had always mirrored Patricia's actions. Patricia always led and started first, while Sophia followed her example only afterwards. Here, however, they seem to go for it at the same time.
1766575799238.png 1766575869594.png 1766575926932.png 1766575974883.png 1766576013559.png

Besides these curiosities, the cliffhanger leaves us with an open question about its resolution. Before we discuss the theories, let's review what happened during the event.
Specifically, there have been many elements of foreshadowing planted in the story that may provide clues as to how the event will be resolved.

  1. During the drive Sophia was concerned about the museum visit and the fact that whole museum tour at 10 pm was a bit odd. Patricia sarcastically brushed off her concerns:
    Python:
    p "Do you think we're going to break in or something? *Ha-ha* Don't be ridiculous."
    And that's exactly what happens.

  2. Patricia went all the way explaining that she always get away with law enforcement using her "assets". She even mentioned that she got away from a speeding ticket using her "assets" just last month.

  3. The security guard is described as an elderly man with cataracts. This is why the guys chose that specific night to break in, counting on the fact that the guard would not be able to see well and could be easily fooled by the static images they used to disable some cameras.

  4. Patricia was particularly focused on the "door that locked" in the break room. Despite her efforts to test it, the guard was able to enter, probably with his pair of keys.

  5. Patricia asked if there could be cameras in the break room
    Python:
    p "But there definitely won't be any cameras in the break room?"
    ja "Not really, and we've disabled the others."

The first question is why the security guard came to inspect the break room if he usually sleeps (3) and if the cameras were disabled (5). It's true that the guard was already making his security round of the rooms of the museum but the break room is in the staff only area. It would be an odd choice for them to go to a place where they knew the guard would come to check.
What could have triggered the guard to check the break room? Could have it been the noise? A failure in the hacking of the cameras (5)? Or did he simply want to have a coffee break or use one of the vending machines there?

If we look at the silhouette of the guard in the render he doesn't seem the silhouette of a old man, but rather someone younger.
1766575746633.png
So it could also be that they made a mistake about the shift, and a different guard is working today. Alternatively, the regular guard might have called in sick, and a substitute came instead.

If we try to put all the elements together, the most probable theory is that Patricia will use her "assets" (2) to get them out of the situation. Probably not up to a blowjob, though.

If we consider (3) and the last description comparing them to a Renaissance painting
1766579034462.png
we can imagine a ridiculous situation where the couples remain frozen in that position while the guard, fooled by the cataract, just glances at them and think they are pieces of art on display.
This Benny Hills-que resolution is a in comedy movies and series.

If the guard is not the old man, there is also the possibility that it is a friend of the guys, someone they know from working there as a side job for the cleaning service. In that case he might be more sympathetic to their cause and just let them go scot-free with a warning (and maybe with a little treat from Patricia).
There is also a more twisted possibility that he is not a real guard but he is from their frat or dorm. This would open a whole different plot twist as the guys may have planned something with their frat (e.g. an initiation rite or something along those liners). So the event will take a different turn and maybe that will explain the announced change of location for the second part.


Miscellanea

As usual, there were some missed opportunities to make the dialogs a little bit more in context with the story and previous events.
For example while Haru is groping Sophia:
1766579207901.png
Obviously Dylan in the cuck route already did that, just to mention one.

Or while Sophia starts lessons 3 on Haru
1766579368494.png
which is not true considering she did that to Dylan the night before, DeShawn, and the apostles in the afternoon.

People have also reported some body anomalies in the renders, especially for Jason's penis and Sophia's nipples. Probably the AI post-processing is involved here.

What to expect next

While we wait for the resolution of the cliffhanger, probably as soon as the first teasers of the second part will be released, we are still in the dark on what and especially where could happen in the second part. We know that there will be a new location that is not in the museum, where it is likely that the "lessons" will be resumed. Some have speculated it could be the dorm or the frat house at the college.

We also know that there will be 3 different endings in the second part. We can imagine that one will be a "safe" ending with less lewd action. For the other two we are still in the dark.

We know that the second part contains two sexual practices in the update that haven't appeared on the Filthy Path before. (source).
Now it would be obvious to assume that at some point they will resume the lesson 4 and there will be a blowjob scene. And that would be a first in the filthy path for Sophia. The first blowjob scene in such a side and irrelevant story with a basically unknown character would be quite a surprise.
Patricia mentioned twice that they were going to blow the guys well before going up to the break room (another foreshadowing):
Python:
p "Where exactly are we doing this teaching? Because, as romantic as marble statues are, I'm not blowing anyone on a museum floor. *Smirk*"
...
p "Oh my God! We're about to blow a couple of criminals."
One possible argument against the blowjob is that, after the scare of the cliffhanger, the sisters may decide to punish the guys by denying them the blowjob, opting for other sexual practices instead. Therefore, when the lessons resume, it is possible that they will "downgrade" the level of practice, so that lesson 4 and 5 will focus on other types of *jobs. For the same reason, itis also possible that the focus of the next 2 lessons switches from pleasuring the guys to rather giving them experience on pleasuring women.

Since at this point any guess is as good as any other, I took the liberty of compiling the table below. It lists the sexual practices taken from the ongoing effort to rethink the F95 tag system. I have already removed the tags related to sexual practices already used in the filthy path with Sophia. (I left penetrative sex related tags, but we know that we don't do that here ;) )
So... take your guess! :)

TagDescription
69Two partners simultaneously perform oral sex upon each other
anal-sexPenetration of the anus with a penis or tentacle
anal-playAny kind of anal related acts not involving penetration with a penis or tongue, eg, toys, butt plugs, fingering,etc
assjobThrusting a penis (or similar object) between ass cheeks
ballbustingActs where someone's testicles are punched, kicked, stepped or suffer any other type of violence.
bdsmVariety of often erotic practices or role-playing involving bondage, discipline, dominance, submission, sadism and masochism
blowjobOral stimulation of the partner's penis
bondageAct of restraining, tying, or binding a person for sexual purposes.
bukkakeSeveral characters ejaculate upon another characterThis is already happened for the tutoring job, but since it is not an "official" part of the story anymore...
cunnilingusOral stimulation of the partner's vagina
deepthroatOral sex where the penis is completely inserted in the partner's mouth and enter the throat.
double-penetrationWhen a character is simultaneously penetrated by two penises (or strap-ons) in the vagina and butt, or in the same hole
facialProtagonist and/or main character(s) giving or receiving an ejaculation to the face
fingeringStimulation of a partner's vagina or anus by using the finger
fistingWhen a character's entire hand penetrates their partner
foot-playSensual or sexual involvement of feet, including foot worship, overt foot displays meant as enticement, licking/sucking of feet. Excluding actual footjobs
footjobUsing feet to sexually stimulate another person
gangbangSexual penetration performed by several people with a single partner, for females on male, see reverse-gangbang
gapingA character's ass or vagina is shown stretched open, often caused by large insertions
group-sexSex act involving 3 or more people
gropingSex act involving groping another's body, for breasts, see boob-play, for nonconsensual, see sexual-harrassment
peggingUsed when a male character is anally penetrated by a female using a strap-on.
rimjobOral stimulation of the partner's anus
rough-sexAggressive sex typically involving pleasurable pain and quick movements, slaps, choking, etc.. Not to be confused with rape or domination
sex-toysAny kind of toy that is used for sexual purposes
spitroastWhen a person is penetrated by two penises (or strap-on), on in the mouth and the other in the vagina or anus
squirtingFemale heavy fluid ejaculation
swallowingThe act of swallowing ejaculate during oral sex
thighjobA sex act where a character thrusts their genitals against or in between their partner's thighs
titjobThrusting a penis (or similar object) in between breasts
urinationActs involving urine, eg, golden shower
vaginal-sexPenetrating the vagina (penis, sex toys, tentacles, etc)
watersportsThe act of peeing on another person, or drinking it.


That's all folks. Have a Merry Christmas!!!
 
Last edited:

palmtrees89

Engaged Member
Jul 3, 2021
2,247
14,259
688
Okay, I was reeeaaaally enjoying this game... until the later chapters when the creator started using AI for dialogue. It is particularly obvious in the theater scene. "His voice curled around her like smoke." "The part that ached, that burned." "Torn between pushing him away and pulling him closer." "Every step had been a surrender, a slow unraveling of her resistance." "The slick evidence of her own arousal." Eyes/gazes darkening. Breaths hitching. And the emdashes! So many emdashes. "Sofia's [sic] lips parted - whether in protest or anticipation, she wasn't sure." "The way he looked at her - like she was the only thing in the world worth seeing - ..." "The way he looked at her - like she was something sacred, something his - sent a fresh wave ..." "The way he said it - like a vow, a promise - made her shiver."

FUCK! UGGHHHH. I'm barely even scratching the surface. It hits all of the cheesy AI trash trademarks in one scene, just one line after the other, an endless barrage of AI sex speak out of fucking nowhere. The whiplash is nuts. It's awful and completely clashes with the rest of the writing style, which isn't perfect but is at least authentic and HOT, unlike this cliched garbage. It's incredibly disappointing, especially this far into the game. If this is the new norm, I'll unfortunately have to say goodbye to this until-now-wonderful experience. PLEASE DON'T DO THIS TO YOUR GAME MR. AUTHOR

EDIT: ...aaaaand reading through the latest comments, I appear not to be the only one upset at this. It's good to know I'm not alone. Gonna leave this here as another voice expressing frustration, but yeah, feel free to ignore my outburst.
It's one thing to use AI as a helping tool for your dialogue, but straight up copy-pasting it into your game's code is bad. And like you said, it's only scratching the surface. There have been so many "buzzwords" you consistently get from ChatGPT&Co, yet L&P acts like he's writing and translating his script from start to finish. A large portion of it was made via AI and just dumped onto the game, often without any editing or changes. This might not be all that obvious to people without some sort of experience in the field, but those who are aware get constantly hit with it.

Heavy use of AI for his DAZ renders is also very much visible, and the tools he is using just aren't great for these kind of 3dcg's. That's just my personal opinion, but I think AI does great for 2dcg games utilizing "hand-drawn" art styles, not for DAZ imagery. At least for now. Some of the animations aren't bad, but he's going way overboard with sub-optimal workflows for DAZ Renders.

I've not played the most recent release and only seen a couple images, but I can imagine it's not much different compared to the previous one apart from fewer AI animations.
 

crackheaded_d

Member
Jan 29, 2025
131
281
123
Here is the unpack of the v0.230a

How to get the event

The event requires day21_Sophia_meets_museum_guys_with_Patricia from the workout scene in v0.230, i.e. Sophia agreeing to meet the museum guys while on the phone with Patricia. This, in turn, required jason_haru_phonenumber from PD 2 when there was the choice to exchange the numbers with the guys.

As expected, the event can be played whether or not Sophia/Dylan's path is open, with the exception of the romantic path, in which Sophia calls Patricia to cancel while they go to the movie theater.


The choices

The choices are pretty straightforward, it is fundamental that Sophia drinks the booze in Pat's car (day21_Sophia_took_drank_booze_in_Pats_car), otherwise the first lewd decision on how to react to Haru behind her (day21_Sophia_reacted_cool_on_Haru_behind_her) is not available. All the subsequent choices are indeed chained to the previous ones and prevents the following ones if the previous ones are not selected.

The only choice that at the moment seems to have no effect is Sophia taking the lead in explaining the first lesson (day21_Sophia_told_boys_first_lession). We'll see if it will have any effect in the second part.

Note that at the moment there is a little bug that allows to go directly into the filthy path even if Sophia didn't reacted cool on Haru in the narrow passage. This will be fixed in the next update.

Up to this moment and contrary to previous events, the variables concerning recent sex with Liam (
day16_Sophia_had_sex_with_Liam , day19_Sophia_had_sex_with_Liam_at_his_workplace, day18_Sophia_Liam_had_sex_on_day18) are not used to prevent lewd choice. We'll see if they will come into play in the second part.

The Museum Guys

It turned out that the meeting was shadier than expected. The guys lied about several things to convince Sophia to go with them to the museum after hours.

1. During the meeting in PD 2 Jason mentioned that his dad knew the museum owner and could arrange a visit. Sophia seemed the one to be skeptical from the beginning, already mentioning it to Patricia in the car:
Python:
"Sophia frowned. 'A museum tour at 10 pm? Are you sure about this? I mean, one of them's dad supposedly knows the owner? I don't know.'"
And she was also the one trying to investigate the matter once inside the museum:
Python:
s "So, and you said your uncle or dad work here? Or how else does he know the museum director?"
ja "Uh... yeah, maintenance. A real art lover, though. Always telling us about the pieces."
Only to find out that they were actually breaking in and there was no dad or uncle and that they have been scouting the place as cleaning staff at night to prepare the break-in.

2. During the initial meeting in PD 2 Haru mentioned that Jason was the star quarterback of the college football team.
Python:
ja "Pretty good. Our football team, the San Alejo Eagles, might win the division championship this year!"
p "Really? That's awesome! Go Eagles! Do you play?"
ha "Does he play? He's the star quarterback!"
ja "Um... I think simply quarterback is enough!"
ha "He's too humble!"
p "Quarterback? For real? It just keeps getting better! Sorry, but aren't you a little short for being a quarterback?"
In the break room we instead discover that he is part of the swimming team.
You don't have permission to view the spoiler content. Log in or register now.
Probably this was another effort to impress the girl with the usual quarterback cliché.

3. They try to lie about their ages when confronted by Patricia
You don't have permission to view the spoiler content. Log in or register now.

4. Not exactly a lie but during the visit they try to downplay their inexperience being confident and in control of the situation. The first crack appear with the van gogh section, for which they provided some lousy excuse to avoid it. Until they finally come clean confessing that they are completely inexperienced and the visit was an excuse to get some experience with older women.
This was a bit of an unexpected turn, which moved the whole event again in the direction of sex-ed, which is largely explored in the others paths (indoubtely with a quite different take here).


The sisters

The premises of the event have been respected. Patricia is the one leading the event, while Sophia is as usual more hesitant, at least at the beginning, only to follow her lead during the lessons in the break room.

On the other hand, we can see that differently that previously event Sophia is more conscious about the possibility that the date is not just about art. From the choice of the dress to the make up, something is awakening and reminding her of who she was before marriage and motherhood "a muscle memory of who she used to be before carpools and PTA meetings became her evening entertainment."

We already saw in the recap post that there was an interesting parallel if not a déjà vu when Sophia meets Patricia outside the house. The dialogs and even some poses are very similar to the ones of Sam's concert.
Another powerful moment is the pact the sisters make in the car before meeting the guys:
Python:
p "One more thing. If you ever wanna bail, we bail. No explanations."
p "I might be a homewrecker, but not a kidnapper. *Smirk*"
"When Sophia's left hand found Patrica's, their two gold wedding bands click together—softly and deliberately, like tiny church bells tolling a secret rebellion."
"As the metal grazed Sophia's knuckle, it felt like a tiny vow being simultaneously forged and broken — a silent promise that whatever unfolds within the museum will be weighed against the significance of both their marriages, ounce for ounce."
s "I'm not gonna bail. I'll remember the feeling of being looked at like I'm the exhibit."
p "Then let's go make some little tour guides stare. *Grin*"
This is a powerful moment because it shows how both sisters are aware of the consequences of their actions and the risk they are taking. The pact they made reinforces the connection between them. Patricia have been presented as the wilder one ever since her young age, while Sophia had at least to give up her younger self to embrace the role of wife and mother. Patricia has been pushing Sophia to rediscover that side of herself ever since they reconnect in San Alejo. And at least in this event she seems to be willing to go down that road ("I'll remember the feeling of being looked at like I'm the exhibit.")

The image of the wedding rings clicking together is also very symbolic, as the pact for this adventure is weighed against their marital commitments. And one cannot help to think it is a nod at the famous scene from Thelma & Louise (obviously without the tragic ending and in a completely different context).

1766226559911.png
1766226680018.png


Another interesting aspect of this event is the dynamic between the sisters and boys. Patricia is clearly the more experienced and dominant one, taking the lead in instructing the guys. Sophia, while still hesitant as usual, has some moments of assertiveness, playing on her teacher role.
She intervene to establish the second of the there rules for the lessons ("You do exactly what we tell you. Nothing more, nothing less.")
And as mentioned before, in the break room Sophia can take the lead in explaining the first lesson.

The whole dynamic with the guys plays on the exhilarating feeling of being in control and having power over the younger and inexperienced. And indeed, contrary to almost all previous events, there is no trace of the usual sign of arousal and horniness during the four lessons. It is only mentioned once at the beginning that the booze and the ambiance made them horny. This is a departure from the usual formula of the other events, at least for this first part. However it seems to fit the theme of the event, power and control.

Finally, so far we had 4 lessons.
1. Undressing the guys
2. Patience with the rule of not touching unless told
3. "It's all about rhythm and pressure."
4. "This is where we distinguish boys and men." which is then interrupted by the security guard.

We can imagine that, whatever the resolution of the cliffhanger will be, the lessons will be resumed in the second part. Since lesson 4 would have been one of the sexual practice not yet explored in the filthy path with Sophia (blowjob), it is also probable that there will a be (a least) a 5th lesson for the second announced sexual practice not yet explored (see below).


The cliffhanger
It could not be a proper event without the usual interruption at the topical moment, with a cliffhanger leading to the second part .

It has been noted that there is a strange jump from the moment the sisters decides to go on with lesson 4 to the moment they are interrupted by the security guard.
The positions of the boys are different. They are now lying on the couch instead of the glass table.
View attachment 5558722 View attachment 5558603
It may be an oversight or a missing sentence in the text to explain the change of position. Maybe it was the rush of the last renders before the release and there was no time make a couple of more renders for the transition.

What is also a bit curious (without going completely in plot theory mode) is that L&P used the 3 renders of them getting caught in the reverse order.
Usually the renders are shown in order according their sequence number. Here instead the are shown in reverse order, from 294 to 291:
Python:
scene day21_11_museum_night 289
"Patricia exchanged a final look with her sister, seeing her own decision reflected in her eyes."
p "Then I suppose we can begin..."
stop music fadeout 1.4
scene day21_11_museum_night 290
"Suddenly,..."
scene day21_11_museum_night 294 with hpunch
"...the door bursted open with a loud click as the lock disengaged."
scene day21_11_museum_night 293
"Immediately, a harsh flashlight beam cut through the intimate darkness, illuminating the scene."
scene day21_11_museum_night 292
"All four of them froze like deer caught in headlights, the beam illuminating a scene that would have made Renaissance painters blush: two elegant women, topless and kneeling, their hands still wrapped around two young men who sat on the couch both in their birthday suits."
"The soft lamplight that had seemed so romantic moments before now felt like stage lighting for their mortification."
scene day21_11_museum_night 291
xm "What the..."
This is curious but probably there is not much to read into it. It may be just an oversight due to the rush and his personal RL events.

Another little curiosity is that under the flash of the security guard's torch we can see that both of them are about to start blowing the guys. In all previous lessons Sophia was always mirroring Patricia's actions. Patricia was always leading and starting while Sophia followed her example only in a second moment. Here they seem to go for it at the same time.
View attachment 5558593 View attachment 5558594 View attachment 5558597 View attachment 5558601 View attachment 5558603

Besides these curiosities, the cliffhanger leaves us with the open question on how this will be resolved in the next part. Before coming to the theories, let's take a step back and look at what happened in the event.
Specifically, there have been many foreshadowing elements planted in the story that may give us some clues on how the event will be resolved.

  1. During the drive Sophia was concerned about the museum visit and the fact that whole museum tour at 10 pm was a bit odd. Patricia sarcastically brushed off her concerns:
    Python:
    p "Do you think we're going to break in or something? *Ha-ha* Don't be ridiculous."
    And that's exactly what happens.

  2. Patricia went all the way explaining that she always get away with law enforcement using her "assets". She even mentioned that she got away from a speeding ticket using her "assets" just last month.

  3. The security guard is described as an elderly man with cataracts. This is way the guys chose that specific night to break in, counting on the fact that the guard would not be able to see well and could be easily fooled by the static images they used to disable some cameras.

  4. Patricia was particularly focused on the "door that locked" in the break room. Besides her testing the guard was able to enter, probably with his pair of keys.

  5. Patricia asked if there could be cameras in the break room
    Python:
    p "But there definitely won't be any cameras in the break room?"
    ja "Not really, and we've disabled the others."

The first question is why the security guard came to inspect the break room if he usually sleeps (3) and if the cameras were disabled (5). It's true that the guard was already making his security round of the rooms of the museum but the break room is in the staff only area. It would be a odd choice for them to go to a place where they know the guard will come to check.
So what could have triggered the guard to check the break roomCould have it been the noises? A failure in the hacking of the cameras (5)? Or simply, e.g. he wanted to have a coffee break or use one of the vending machines there?

If we look at the silhouette of the guard in the render he doesn't seem the silhouette of a old man, but rather someone younger.
View attachment 5558592
So it could also be that they made a mistake about the shift and there is a different guard or simply the old guard called in sick and a substitute guard came instead.

If we try to put all the elements together, the most probable theory is that Patricia will use her "assets" (2) to get them out of the situation. Probably not up to a blowjob, though.

If we consider (3) and the last description comparing them to a Renaissance painting
View attachment 5558686
we can imagine a ridiculous situation where the couples stay frozen in that position while the guard, fooled by the cataract, just glances at them and think they are art pieces on display.
This Benny Hillsque resolution is a well in comedy movies and series.

If the guard is not the old man, there is also the possibility that it is a friend of the guys, someone they know from working there as a side job for the cleaning service. In that case he could be more sympathetic to their cause and just let them go scot-free with a warning (and maybe with a little treat from Patricia).
There is also a more twisted possibility that he is not a real guard but he is from their frat or dorm. This would open a whole different plot twist as the guys may have planned something with their frat (e.g. an initiation rite or something along those liners). So the event will take a different turn and maybe that will also explain the announced change of location for the second part.


Miscellanea

As usual, there were some missed opportunities to make the dialogs a little bit more in context with the story and previous events.
For example while Haru is groping Sophia:
View attachment 5558692
Obviously Dylan in the cuck route already did that, just to mention one.

Or while Sophia starts lessons 3 on Haru
View attachment 5558705
which is not true considering she did that to Dylan the night before, DeShawn, and the apostles in the afternoon.

People have also reported some body anomalies in the renders, especially for Jason's penis and Sophia's nipples. Probably the AI post-processing is involved here.

What to expect next

While we wait for the resolution of the cliffhanger, probably as soon as the first teasers of the second part will be released, we are still in the dark on what and especially where could happen. We know that there will be a new location that is not in the museum, where probably the "lessons" will be resumed. Some have speculated it could be the dorm or the frat house at the college.

We also know that there will be 3 different endings in the second part. We can imagine that one will be a "safe" ending with less lewd action. For the other two we are still in the dark.

We only know that the second part contains two sexual practices in the update that haven't appeared on the Filthy Path before. (source).
Now it would be almost obvious to think that at some point they will resume the lesson 4 and there will be a blowjob scene. And that would be a first in the filthy path for Sophia. The first blowjob scene in such a side and irrelevant story with a basically unknown character would be quite a surprise.
Patricia mentioned twice that they were going to blow the guys well before going up to the break room (another foreshadowing):
Python:
p "Where exactly are we doing this teaching? Because, as romantic as marble statues are, I'm not blowing anyone on a museum floor. *Smirk*"
...
p "Oh my God! We're about to blow a couple of criminals."
As argument against the blowjob one can think that, after the scare of the cliffhanger, the sister my decide to punish the guys by denying them the blowjob, going for other sexual practices instead. So a possibility could be that the lesson 4 when resumed will "downgrade" the level of the practice, so that lesson 4 and 5 will go for other kinds of *jobs. It is also possible that for the same reason the focus of the next 2 lessons switches from pleasuring the guys to rather giving them experience on pleasuring women.

Since at this point any guess is as good as any other, I took the liberty of compiling the table below. It lists the sexual practices taken from the ongoing effort of rethinking the F95 tag system. I already removed the tags related to sexual practices already used in the filthy path with Sophia. (I left penetrative sex related tags, but we know that we don't do that here ;) )
So... take your guess! :)

TagDescription
69Two partners simultaneously perform oral sex upon each other
anal-sexPenetration of the anus with a penis or tentacle
anal-playAny kind of anal related acts not involving penetration with a penis or tongue, eg, toys, butt plugs, fingering,etc
assjobThrusting a penis (or similar object) between ass cheeks
ballbustingActs where someone's testicles are punched, kicked, stepped or suffer any other type of violence.
bdsmVariety of often erotic practices or role-playing involving bondage, discipline, dominance, submission, sadism and masochism
blowjobOral stimulation of the partner's penis
bondageAct of restraining, tying, or binding a person for sexual purposes.
bukkakeSeveral characters ejaculate upon another characterThis is already happened for the tutoring job, but since it is not an "official" part of the story anymore...
cunnilingusOral stimulation of the partner's vagina
deepthroatOral sex where the penis is completely inserted in the partner's mouth and enter the throat.
double-penetrationWhen a character is simultaneously penetrated by two penises (or strap-ons) in the vagina and butt, or in the same hole
facialProtagonist and/or main character(s) giving or receiving an ejaculation to the face
fingeringStimulation of a partner's vagina or anus by using the finger
fistingWhen a character's entire hand penetrates their partner
foot-playSensual or sexual involvement of feet, including foot worship, overt foot displays meant as enticement, licking/sucking of feet. Excluding actual footjobs
footjobUsing feet to sexually stimulate another person
gangbangSexual penetration performed by several people with a single partner, for females on male, see reverse-gangbang
gapingA character's ass or vagina is shown stretched open, often caused by large insertions
group-sexSex act involving 3 or more people
gropingSex act involving groping another's body, for breasts, see boob-play, for nonconsensual, see sexual-harrassment
peggingUsed when a male character is anally penetrated by a female using a strap-on.
rimjobOral stimulation of the partner's anus
rough-sexAggressive sex typically involving pleasurable pain and quick movements, slaps, choking, etc.. Not to be confused with rape or domination
sex-toysAny kind of toy that is used for sexual purposes
spitroastWhen a person is penetrated by two penises (or strap-on), on in the mouth and the other in the vagina or anus
squirtingFemale heavy fluid ejaculation
swallowingThe act of swallowing ejaculate during oral sex
thighjobA sex act where a character thrusts their genitals against or in between their partner's thighs
titjobThrusting a penis (or similar object) in between breasts
urinationActs involving urine, eg, golden shower
vaginal-sexPenetrating the vagina (penis, sex toys, tentacles, etc)
watersportsThe act of peeing on another person, or drinking it.


That's all folks. Have a Merry Christmas!!!
Someone already mentioned that all the updates with different paths are not connected to each other in any way, and each event is like a "parallel world" where Sofia had no one except her husband, and this is all "new" for her (I agree, because, as you already mentioned, after the scenes with Dylan, and not only with him, a lot of what happened to her in this update had already happened before).
 

hzjujk

Well-Known Member
Sep 19, 2020
1,923
8,243
729
Here is the unpack of the v0.230a

How to get the event

The event requires day21_Sophia_meets_museum_guys_with_Patricia from the workout scene in v0.230, i.e. Sophia agreeing to meet the museum guys while on the phone with Patricia. This, in turn, required jason_haru_phonenumber from PD 2 when there was the choice to exchange the numbers with the guys.

As expected, the event can be played whether or not Sophia/Dylan's path is open, with the exception of the romantic path, in which Sophia calls Patricia to cancel while they go to the movie theater.


The choices

The choices are pretty straightforward, it is fundamental that Sophia drinks the booze in Pat's car (day21_Sophia_took_drank_booze_in_Pats_car), otherwise the first lewd decision on how to react to Haru behind her (day21_Sophia_reacted_cool_on_Haru_behind_her) is not available. All the subsequent choices are indeed chained to the previous ones and prevents the following ones if the previous ones are not selected.

The only choice that at the moment seems to have no effect is Sophia taking the lead in explaining the first lesson (day21_Sophia_told_boys_first_lession). We'll see if it will have any effect in the second part.

Note that at the moment there is a little bug that allows to go directly into the filthy path even if Sophia didn't reacted cool on Haru in the narrow passage. This will be fixed in the next update.

Up to this moment and contrary to previous events, the variables concerning recent sex with Liam (
day16_Sophia_had_sex_with_Liam , day19_Sophia_had_sex_with_Liam_at_his_workplace, day18_Sophia_Liam_had_sex_on_day18) are not used to prevent lewd choice. We'll see if they will come into play in the second part.

The Museum Guys

It turned out that the meeting was shadier than expected. The guys lied about several things to convince Sophia to go with them to the museum after hours.

1. During the meeting in PD 2 Jason mentioned that his dad knew the museum owner and could arrange a visit. Sophia seemed the one to be skeptical from the beginning, already mentioning it to Patricia in the car:
Python:
"Sophia frowned. 'A museum tour at 10 pm? Are you sure about this? I mean, one of them's dad supposedly knows the owner? I don't know.'"
And she was also the one trying to investigate the matter once inside the museum:
Python:
s "So, and you said your uncle or dad work here? Or how else does he know the museum director?"
ja "Uh... yeah, maintenance. A real art lover, though. Always telling us about the pieces."
Only to find out that they were actually breaking in and there was no dad or uncle and that they have been scouting the place as cleaning staff at night to prepare the break-in.

2. During the initial meeting in PD 2 Haru mentioned that Jason was the star quarterback of the college football team.
Python:
ja "Pretty good. Our football team, the San Alejo Eagles, might win the division championship this year!"
p "Really? That's awesome! Go Eagles! Do you play?"
ha "Does he play? He's the star quarterback!"
ja "Um... I think simply quarterback is enough!"
ha "He's too humble!"
p "Quarterback? For real? It just keeps getting better! Sorry, but aren't you a little short for being a quarterback?"
In the break room we instead discover that he is part of the swimming team.
You don't have permission to view the spoiler content. Log in or register now.
Probably this was another effort to impress the girl with the usual quarterback cliché.

3. They try to lie about their ages when confronted by Patricia
You don't have permission to view the spoiler content. Log in or register now.

4. Not exactly a lie but during the visit they try to downplay their inexperience being confident and in control of the situation. The first crack appear with the van gogh section, for which they provided some lousy excuse to avoid it. Until they finally come clean confessing that they are completely inexperienced and the visit was an excuse to get some experience with older women.
This was a bit of an unexpected turn, which moved the whole event again in the direction of sex-ed, which is largely explored in the others paths (indoubtely with a quite different take here).


The sisters

The premises of the event have been respected. Patricia is the one leading the event, while Sophia is as usual more hesitant, at least at the beginning, only to follow her lead during the lessons in the break room.

On the other hand, we can see that differently that previously event Sophia is more conscious about the possibility that the date is not just about art. From the choice of the dress to the make up, something is awakening and reminding her of who she was before marriage and motherhood "a muscle memory of who she used to be before carpools and PTA meetings became her evening entertainment."

We already saw in the recap post that there was an interesting parallel if not a déjà vu when Sophia meets Patricia outside the house. The dialogs and even some poses are very similar to the ones of Sam's concert.
Another powerful moment is the pact the sisters make in the car before meeting the guys:
Python:
p "One more thing. If you ever wanna bail, we bail. No explanations."
p "I might be a homewrecker, but not a kidnapper. *Smirk*"
"When Sophia's left hand found Patrica's, their two gold wedding bands click together—softly and deliberately, like tiny church bells tolling a secret rebellion."
"As the metal grazed Sophia's knuckle, it felt like a tiny vow being simultaneously forged and broken — a silent promise that whatever unfolds within the museum will be weighed against the significance of both their marriages, ounce for ounce."
s "I'm not gonna bail. I'll remember the feeling of being looked at like I'm the exhibit."
p "Then let's go make some little tour guides stare. *Grin*"
This is a powerful moment because it shows how both sisters are aware of the consequences of their actions and the risk they are taking. The pact they made reinforces the connection between them. Patricia have been presented as the wilder one ever since her young age, while Sophia had at least to give up her younger self to embrace the role of wife and mother. Patricia has been pushing Sophia to rediscover that side of herself ever since they reconnect in San Alejo. And at least in this event she seems to be willing to go down that road ("I'll remember the feeling of being looked at like I'm the exhibit.")

The image of the wedding rings clicking together is also very symbolic, as the pact for this adventure is weighed against their marital commitments. And one cannot help to think it is a nod at the famous scene from Thelma & Louise (obviously without the tragic ending and in a completely different context).

1766226559911.png
1766226680018.png


Another interesting aspect of this event is the dynamic between the sisters and boys. Patricia is clearly the more experienced and dominant one, taking the lead in instructing the guys. Sophia, while still hesitant as usual, has some moments of assertiveness, playing on her teacher role.
She intervene to establish the second of the there rules for the lessons ("You do exactly what we tell you. Nothing more, nothing less.")
And as mentioned before, in the break room Sophia can take the lead in explaining the first lesson.

The whole dynamic with the guys plays on the exhilarating feeling of being in control and having power over the younger and inexperienced. And indeed, contrary to almost all previous events, there is no trace of the usual sign of arousal and horniness during the four lessons. It is only mentioned once at the beginning that the booze and the ambiance made them horny. This is a departure from the usual formula of the other events, at least for this first part. However it seems to fit the theme of the event, power and control.

Finally, so far we had 4 lessons.
1. Undressing the guys
2. Patience with the rule of not touching unless told
3. "It's all about rhythm and pressure."
4. "This is where we distinguish boys and men." which is then interrupted by the security guard.

We can imagine that, whatever the resolution of the cliffhanger will be, the lessons will be resumed in the second part. Since lesson 4 would have been one of the sexual practice not yet explored in the filthy path with Sophia (blowjob), it is also probable that there will a be (a least) a 5th lesson for the second announced sexual practice not yet explored (see below).


The cliffhanger
It could not be a proper event without the usual interruption at the topical moment, with a cliffhanger leading to the second part .

It has been noted that there is a strange jump from the moment the sisters decides to go on with lesson 4 to the moment they are interrupted by the security guard.
The positions of the boys are different. They are now lying on the couch instead of the glass table.
View attachment 5558722 View attachment 5558603
It may be an oversight or a missing sentence in the text to explain the change of position. Maybe it was the rush of the last renders before the release and there was no time make a couple of more renders for the transition.

What is also a bit curious (without going completely in plot theory mode) is that L&P used the 3 renders of them getting caught in the reverse order.
Usually the renders are shown in order according their sequence number. Here instead the are shown in reverse order, from 294 to 291:
Python:
scene day21_11_museum_night 289
"Patricia exchanged a final look with her sister, seeing her own decision reflected in her eyes."
p "Then I suppose we can begin..."
stop music fadeout 1.4
scene day21_11_museum_night 290
"Suddenly,..."
scene day21_11_museum_night 294 with hpunch
"...the door bursted open with a loud click as the lock disengaged."
scene day21_11_museum_night 293
"Immediately, a harsh flashlight beam cut through the intimate darkness, illuminating the scene."
scene day21_11_museum_night 292
"All four of them froze like deer caught in headlights, the beam illuminating a scene that would have made Renaissance painters blush: two elegant women, topless and kneeling, their hands still wrapped around two young men who sat on the couch both in their birthday suits."
"The soft lamplight that had seemed so romantic moments before now felt like stage lighting for their mortification."
scene day21_11_museum_night 291
xm "What the..."
This is curious but probably there is not much to read into it. It may be just an oversight due to the rush and his personal RL events.

Another little curiosity is that under the flash of the security guard's torch we can see that both of them are about to start blowing the guys. In all previous lessons Sophia was always mirroring Patricia's actions. Patricia was always leading and starting while Sophia followed her example only in a second moment. Here they seem to go for it at the same time.
View attachment 5558593 View attachment 5558594 View attachment 5558597 View attachment 5558601 View attachment 5558603

Besides these curiosities, the cliffhanger leaves us with the open question on how this will be resolved in the next part. Before coming to the theories, let's take a step back and look at what happened in the event.
Specifically, there have been many foreshadowing elements planted in the story that may give us some clues on how the event will be resolved.

  1. During the drive Sophia was concerned about the museum visit and the fact that whole museum tour at 10 pm was a bit odd. Patricia sarcastically brushed off her concerns:
    Python:
    p "Do you think we're going to break in or something? *Ha-ha* Don't be ridiculous."
    And that's exactly what happens.

  2. Patricia went all the way explaining that she always get away with law enforcement using her "assets". She even mentioned that she got away from a speeding ticket using her "assets" just last month.

  3. The security guard is described as an elderly man with cataracts. This is way the guys chose that specific night to break in, counting on the fact that the guard would not be able to see well and could be easily fooled by the static images they used to disable some cameras.

  4. Patricia was particularly focused on the "door that locked" in the break room. Besides her testing the guard was able to enter, probably with his pair of keys.

  5. Patricia asked if there could be cameras in the break room
    Python:
    p "But there definitely won't be any cameras in the break room?"
    ja "Not really, and we've disabled the others."

The first question is why the security guard came to inspect the break room if he usually sleeps (3) and if the cameras were disabled (5). It's true that the guard was already making his security round of the rooms of the museum but the break room is in the staff only area. It would be a odd choice for them to go to a place where they know the guard will come to check.
So what could have triggered the guard to check the break roomCould have it been the noises? A failure in the hacking of the cameras (5)? Or simply, e.g. he wanted to have a coffee break or use one of the vending machines there?

If we look at the silhouette of the guard in the render he doesn't seem the silhouette of a old man, but rather someone younger.
View attachment 5558592
So it could also be that they made a mistake about the shift and there is a different guard or simply the old guard called in sick and a substitute guard came instead.

If we try to put all the elements together, the most probable theory is that Patricia will use her "assets" (2) to get them out of the situation. Probably not up to a blowjob, though.

If we consider (3) and the last description comparing them to a Renaissance painting
View attachment 5558686
we can imagine a ridiculous situation where the couples stay frozen in that position while the guard, fooled by the cataract, just glances at them and think they are art pieces on display.
This Benny Hillsque resolution is a well in comedy movies and series.

If the guard is not the old man, there is also the possibility that it is a friend of the guys, someone they know from working there as a side job for the cleaning service. In that case he could be more sympathetic to their cause and just let them go scot-free with a warning (and maybe with a little treat from Patricia).
There is also a more twisted possibility that he is not a real guard but he is from their frat or dorm. This would open a whole different plot twist as the guys may have planned something with their frat (e.g. an initiation rite or something along those liners). So the event will take a different turn and maybe that will also explain the announced change of location for the second part.


Miscellanea

As usual, there were some missed opportunities to make the dialogs a little bit more in context with the story and previous events.
For example while Haru is groping Sophia:
View attachment 5558692
Obviously Dylan in the cuck route already did that, just to mention one.

Or while Sophia starts lessons 3 on Haru
View attachment 5558705
which is not true considering she did that to Dylan the night before, DeShawn, and the apostles in the afternoon.

People have also reported some body anomalies in the renders, especially for Jason's penis and Sophia's nipples. Probably the AI post-processing is involved here.

What to expect next

While we wait for the resolution of the cliffhanger, probably as soon as the first teasers of the second part will be released, we are still in the dark on what and especially where could happen. We know that there will be a new location that is not in the museum, where probably the "lessons" will be resumed. Some have speculated it could be the dorm or the frat house at the college.

We also know that there will be 3 different endings in the second part. We can imagine that one will be a "safe" ending with less lewd action. For the other two we are still in the dark.

We only know that the second part contains two sexual practices in the update that haven't appeared on the Filthy Path before. (source).
Now it would be almost obvious to think that at some point they will resume the lesson 4 and there will be a blowjob scene. And that would be a first in the filthy path for Sophia. The first blowjob scene in such a side and irrelevant story with a basically unknown character would be quite a surprise.
Patricia mentioned twice that they were going to blow the guys well before going up to the break room (another foreshadowing):
Python:
p "Where exactly are we doing this teaching? Because, as romantic as marble statues are, I'm not blowing anyone on a museum floor. *Smirk*"
...
p "Oh my God! We're about to blow a couple of criminals."
As argument against the blowjob one can think that, after the scare of the cliffhanger, the sister my decide to punish the guys by denying them the blowjob, going for other sexual practices instead. So a possibility could be that the lesson 4 when resumed will "downgrade" the level of the practice, so that lesson 4 and 5 will go for other kinds of *jobs. It is also possible that for the same reason the focus of the next 2 lessons switches from pleasuring the guys to rather giving them experience on pleasuring women.

Since at this point any guess is as good as any other, I took the liberty of compiling the table below. It lists the sexual practices taken from the ongoing effort of rethinking the F95 tag system. I already removed the tags related to sexual practices already used in the filthy path with Sophia. (I left penetrative sex related tags, but we know that we don't do that here ;) )
So... take your guess! :)

TagDescription
69Two partners simultaneously perform oral sex upon each other
anal-sexPenetration of the anus with a penis or tentacle
anal-playAny kind of anal related acts not involving penetration with a penis or tongue, eg, toys, butt plugs, fingering,etc
assjobThrusting a penis (or similar object) between ass cheeks
ballbustingActs where someone's testicles are punched, kicked, stepped or suffer any other type of violence.
bdsmVariety of often erotic practices or role-playing involving bondage, discipline, dominance, submission, sadism and masochism
blowjobOral stimulation of the partner's penis
bondageAct of restraining, tying, or binding a person for sexual purposes.
bukkakeSeveral characters ejaculate upon another characterThis is already happened for the tutoring job, but since it is not an "official" part of the story anymore...
cunnilingusOral stimulation of the partner's vagina
deepthroatOral sex where the penis is completely inserted in the partner's mouth and enter the throat.
double-penetrationWhen a character is simultaneously penetrated by two penises (or strap-ons) in the vagina and butt, or in the same hole
facialProtagonist and/or main character(s) giving or receiving an ejaculation to the face
fingeringStimulation of a partner's vagina or anus by using the finger
fistingWhen a character's entire hand penetrates their partner
foot-playSensual or sexual involvement of feet, including foot worship, overt foot displays meant as enticement, licking/sucking of feet. Excluding actual footjobs
footjobUsing feet to sexually stimulate another person
gangbangSexual penetration performed by several people with a single partner, for females on male, see reverse-gangbang
gapingA character's ass or vagina is shown stretched open, often caused by large insertions
group-sexSex act involving 3 or more people
gropingSex act involving groping another's body, for breasts, see boob-play, for nonconsensual, see sexual-harrassment
peggingUsed when a male character is anally penetrated by a female using a strap-on.
rimjobOral stimulation of the partner's anus
rough-sexAggressive sex typically involving pleasurable pain and quick movements, slaps, choking, etc.. Not to be confused with rape or domination
sex-toysAny kind of toy that is used for sexual purposes
spitroastWhen a person is penetrated by two penises (or strap-on), on in the mouth and the other in the vagina or anus
squirtingFemale heavy fluid ejaculation
swallowingThe act of swallowing ejaculate during oral sex
thighjobA sex act where a character thrusts their genitals against or in between their partner's thighs
titjobThrusting a penis (or similar object) in between breasts
urinationActs involving urine, eg, golden shower
vaginal-sexPenetrating the vagina (penis, sex toys, tentacles, etc)
watersportsThe act of peeing on another person, or drinking it.


That's all folks. Have a Merry Christmas!!

Thanks for the summary.

Just a small addition from me. In the event, there is a scene before the four move to the lounge where the narrator says something like, “That was the most exciting thing the two women had experienced in years.”

If that wasn't an oversight on the part of L&P, it implies to me that Patricia was quite a loudmouth. And it provides a motive for why she tries to make her big sister more “open” to extramarital sexual experiences. She needs a partner in crime to live out her sexual fantasies, and her sister is the one she seems to trust the most.

And one more thing: in the past, there was an opinion here on f95 that it would be Patricia who would slow her sister down when it came to sexual adventures, as a moral compass, so to speak. I could never follow this argument, and I think the latest update has effectively refuted this interpretation of Patricia's role in Sophia's corruption.
 
3.20 star(s) 567 Votes