- May 11, 2017
- 3,109
- 10,857
Machine algorithm's do not translate things better than a human. This is one of a machine's weaknesses.Now now I knew someone would say this, that's why I said we could train a ML model finetune it much more on the sentences they have already converted in last few years and voila it would be even better than a person translating that!!
Further more think of technology as a enabler if not 100 percent this could still save 80 percent of the time rest 20 he can just go over and correct something if he wants...
I have created numerous products which can even listen to customer care calls, convert them to correct language and understand why the sale wasn't maid etc.. Believe me when I say that today's NLP models can write better stories and idioms than you or at least a porn game creator,now would I says it's intelligent it definitely isn't, but can it come up with better suited idioms than a English PhD holder, it certainly can...
Then again I would stress that technology is a enabler, we should use it to automate as much as we can, even if it's saving 21 days or 10, saving even 5 for every game release is a big plus because at the end it's 45 man hours that's saved...
Machines are incapable of understanding context, tone, sarcasm, ect the same way that a human can.
The day that they can surpass humans is the day we have reached the
You must be registered to see the links
.Right now there are chess engines that are rated 3700+ and no human has yet reached 2900. They have far surpassed us in chess playing skill. In my pocket I have a cellphone that could defeat the world chess champion. Do you know what that chess engine can not do? It can not put into simple English terms why it has made a move that is has made. A human Grand Master could easily do that.
There is millions of dollars in chess. A lot of computer programming too. Why are none of those super powered engines capable of explaining the reason behind a simple move? Surely there is much incentive in the chess community to make engines capable of explaining the moves for you to be better teachers. If someone made such a talkative engine that gave good explanations surely it would sell for plenty of money.
Do you know how the computer would explain it if it had the ability to do so? "The one number was bigger than the other number when I ran my evaluation function. I prefer favorable numbers."
Machines don't understand why they do what they do. They are just programmed to do so. They can not comprehend what they are doing the way a human can. They are oblivious and completely unaware.
If you were not so full of shit that your eyes have literally turned brown I would be absolutely terrified of these sentient machines you are speaking of. However, I know better.
Neuro-linguistic programming is no match for an actual human. You are babbling on about pseudo science because the resources needed to make such a thing reality would require
You must be registered to see the links
to process it.In fifty years we may be there, but we are not there yet and nowhere close to there.