No no no. The developer knows best what the consumers want. Because what they want is deep in their subconscious.
Are you Steve Jobs? Hahaha
Why do developers create prototypes to see consumer responses?
Why release the game during the beta test period?
Why add events to regular updates?
Why does the developer of this game proceed with the vote?
According to you, shouldn't the developer already know the results?
Do developers vote to laugh at consumers?
Or do developers want to turn consumers' complaints about slow game development?
According to you, the developer knows what I want, so why are people like me unhappy?
Because the developer knows what I want, but the developer doesn't act?
If then the developer is deceiving the consumer?
Jobs knew that humans wanted to be lazy.
So Jobs made something that people can do with one hand.
I'll tell you again.
Everyone has a right to talk about everything.
The act of exchanging feedback is another word of conversation, and conversation is the act of exchanging influence with the other person.
And feedback is an act of providing various information and opinions to product developers, and developers can choose what they want from various feedbacks.
If the consumer says it's bad, the chef changes the recipe, and if the consumer says it's good, he can make the food the way he always does.
My writing may be uncomfortable if you regard the developer as sacrosanct and blindly follow him, but there is no problem with consumers clapping or complaining because L&P is a seller and I am a consumer.
