You don't even understand what my post was about. It's not about making the game faster for me. It's not about paying money or not paying. I am absolutely not one of those people who write ""and where? and when? let's go faster.". In general, the ratio of L$P (and I don't just change & to $) to what is happening. He says that "They just care about money and commerce by giving people what they want.", but in fact he is the same. Only the scheme is different. If a big company needs to release a game faster in order to get more profit, and he needs to slow down the process in order to get more profit. The current tightening is just about that. He says that he will release faster, but adds an element of tightening - animation. I understand there was something similar before. He wanted to speed up the release of the update, but added an element of delay. I wouldn't be surprised if in a couple of years he again talks about speeding up the release of updates and adds an element of tightening. I didn't even write anything negative when he was looking for someone to do animation for a month. Okay, it was inevitable. Someday he would have spent time on it anyway. I even treated it with understanding, unlike others who did not like it. But to say that those who do not violate deadlines are "just care about money and commerce"... Can he look at himself from the outside at least once or twice? Although I doubt that he will see something bad, because he is so wonderful in his endeavors. Not to mention the fact that it can be interpreted as an insult to those who are trying to do according to plan and keep up with the deadlines. Yes, well, many people can break deadlines for one reason or another, but then try to rehabilitate themselves and enter the schedule. But in the case of L$P, he is only trying to rehabilitate himself by talking and talking and telling how cool everything will be. He should go to the government. They like them there. For me personally: make > conversations. (yes, we can say that he does not waste time and makes another update while the animation is in development, but in fact this is the same update release schedule as it was)
And your whole speech came down to this: if you paid, you have the right to say so, if you didn't pay, you don't. If a company sells some kind of product or service and says how cool everything is with it, what cool technologies and capabilities, and I didn't buy it and looked from the side and saw some shit, then my voice doesn't matter at all? No, if someone behaves like that and I don't like it, I have the right to speak out like that. Yes, it was rude, but after 2 years of observation, it's very cute.
And this eternal theme of "you paid - you have the right", can then immediately begin to eliminate poor people, so to speak? And then why can they say something if they have not acquired anything. I don't consider myself poor, but I think the hint is clear.
If you don't understand my speech and you still think "you paid - you have the right", then it's better not even start answering. I will never go over to this disgusting side of the vision of the situation. Add me to ignore.
P.S. If L$P spits in my face, then it's still "my fight" with him and I don't need defenders. A person should try to stand up for himself. Moreover, looking for support in strangers is a vague idea.