- Jul 20, 2019
- 8,993
- 17,559
Losing one sponsor means he'd lose all of them? Worst case scenario, he'd only lose the ones that voted for Dylan - which at the time was around 400. So about 20% of his patrons. Sure that's a chuck, but far from all.As I said, I did not do site activities when I was a sponsor because I am not familiar with English.
But based on what I did, based on the responses of the users written on the bulletin board here...
Consumers care about a high level of patronage because they want all the information and want to be involved in all the activities.
But give up sponsoring when they feel the risk that no matter how much time goes by, there is no end in sight and that this game may come to a standstill.
A user wrote a story.
"Given that the number of sponsors has increased, but the amount of sponsorship has not increased, the sponsors must have lowered the level of sponsorship."
I suspect that many backers have given up and gone and new backers have filled the vacancy.
I think that's why the amount of sponsorship hasn't changed much compared to the number of sponsors and there are many users who don't know that this game is already five to six years old.
This is why I guarantee that if this game disappears from this site, half the sponsors will be in a year or two.
And if he lose a sponsor who wants a top-ranked character in the polls like Dylan, he can guarantee that the game's developer will lose all of its sponsors.
People are interested in the sub-food only when the main food is satisfactory.
people who are disappointed with the main food are not sitting in their chairs because of the sub-food.
This game developer's activities are business.
There is no long-lasting product that disappoints consumers.
And with the rising popularity of arsehole characters like Aiden, losing all of his Dylan supporters just because he looks bad is far from a foregone conclusion.