buddy, read this completely once,
xxxorro has answered your confusing questions correctly and some things you don't know. Added 1 cuck point to Dylan in Sophia/Dylan Part 1 event. L&P said that there will be no Cuck events or scenes and in Part 1 and 2, only focusing on the progression of the Sophia/Dylan romantic relationship. But look at this. And He said that there were no flashbacks to Sophia losing her virginity for the first time, and instead he included it in the event via a flashback scene in Part 1 as part of Dylan's Cuck scene.
L&P has been sending mixed signals lately.
Starting with Sophia's first time, he said there would be
no flashbacks about that, and instead he added them as part of Dylan's cuck route/path (I agree that "voyeur" is more appropriate, so cDylan --> vDylan
)
He said that in Part 1 & 2 there would be no cuck events, but just
focusing on the progress of the two.
The whole Part 1 (and 2) is prevented if the cuck path (Dylan not telling Sophia about Davon) is chosen during the previous event. Story-wise, the choice is rationalized as making Sophia feel safer and protected by Dylan so he can join the relaxing bath.
At the same time, this **seems** to suggest that the cuck/voyeur path in which Dylan will somehow test his theory about Sophia is
alternative to the "normal" Sophia/Dylan path. And yet, see above, we got cuck points for the flashback. Which is kind of inconsistent (leaving aside the weirdness of the exchange), why collecting points for a path that is mutually exclusive with the current one? Unless there will be other events à la Devon in the future that allows to switch again to the cuck path. OR, simply, the two routes are not so distinct/independent?
For the upcoming event, I'd still tend to expect no major cuck/voyeur event because the focus should be on Sophia/Dylan, but in the light of the previous event I won't exclude there would be still some points awarded for a minor voyeuristic action: for example letting someone paying a compliment or lightly flirt with Sophia without any further development. It would still not be consistent or make sense in terms of "paths" IMO, but I'm afraid that the consistency boat has sailed some time ago.