mitanc92

Newbie
May 8, 2018
66
248
It would be really naive of us to think that the progress bar corresponds to his real time workload.. Knowing L&P, he would definitely be either ahead or even almost done with the update.The reasoning behind this lies with the teasers.

While 'Art edited with PS' still stands at 0%, all of the teasers look release ready and I'm pretty sure he isn't gonna edit anything more in those renders (for those going to facepalm, it will be easy to cross-check if these teaser renders vary significantly from the final renders upon release).

So while it's satisfying to track the 5% and have 'absolutely useful' discussions about it, L&P is gonna release the update when he wants and modify the progress bar according to his chosen release date (and not based on his real-time work load).
 

Radoslaw Wolf

Well-Known Member
May 23, 2017
1,927
6,089
It would be really naive of us to think that the progress bar corresponds to his real time workload..
Except for maybe a few newcomers, who have been here for less than one release cycle - nobody with functioning brain thinks so. That being said, there are among us some very mentally troubled individuals who keep trying to prove otherwise. I recommend staying away from them...
So while it's satisfying to track the 5% and have 'absolutely useful' discussions about it, L&P is gonna release the update when he wants and modify the progress bar according to his chosen release date (and not based on his real-time work load).
And we literally cannot do shit about it, for he has no slightest hint of intention to change it.
 

tofhdns

Well-Known Member
Jan 25, 2021
1,697
4,025
I found something interesting again.

In the last update, the progress was changed from "75% complete/25% incomplete" to "55% complete/45% incomplete" and 20% rendering was added.

And before version 0.190 was released, I complained, "It looks like the ending of version 0.190 will be the same as the ending of version 0.185," and after version 0.190 was released, I said, "It looks like a handjob scene was added."
(For anyone who will "challenge" me: I'd mentioned the possibility of a handjob scene when I found out about the 20% rendering addition. Maybe)

I checked it now, and assuming that approximately 82 or 83 renderings were added in the last update, there was a possibility that the last update would end before the handjob scene started.

If my guess was correct, this means that the developer had no plans to provide handjob scenes in the last update.

And in this update, the developer said he is adding 100 renderings.
(I said almost nothing about this update, Maybe)

It's also possible that this developer added something he didn't want (but what subscribers wanted).

(If you want something, you should say “I want it,” not “I believe it.”)
 
Last edited:

Couto25

Well-Known Member
Oct 7, 2023
1,691
4,137
(If you want something, you should say “I want it,” not “I believe it.”)
[/QUOTE]
I want sophia sex...and I am talking on behalf of whole AWAM community.....maybe beside dylan/teen fanbase aside:ROFLMAO:
 
  • Like
Reactions: tofhdns

tofhdns

Well-Known Member
Jan 25, 2021
1,697
4,025
The point where LP changed his mind was initially planning for Sophia to undress completely but then reconsidered.
We can see in the scene where Sophia initially takes off her pants while sitting with Dylan and then puts them back on :ROFLMAO:
I interpreted the scene the other way.

This is what I thought, this developer didn't plan on taking their clothes off in the first place, but he needed to show his subscribers something, so he took them off and put them back on.

But even if that's not the case, this isn't the first time the developer has taken off a character's clothes and put them back on.

Additionally, there doesn't need to be 20% more rendering from the last update for that scene.
 
Last edited:

Radoslaw Wolf

Well-Known Member
May 23, 2017
1,927
6,089
We can see in the scene where Sophia initially takes off her pants while sitting with Dylan and then puts them back on :ROFLMAO:
Which was a complete nonsense - just like Dylan's doing the same thing in the bathtub before - and totally spoiled the mood, the rhythm, etc.
OK, we get it: you're trying to painfully slowly hint on the progress, but can it, kindly please, at least make some sense...?
 

tofhdns

Well-Known Member
Jan 25, 2021
1,697
4,025
Technically you can be both right, I guess..? :unsure:
I can't accept it.

If we accept that statement, it means that this developer tried to take the character's clothes off, put them back on, and then added a handjob scene.

I'm now saying that this developer had no intention of stripping the character, but did so (even though briefly) and included a handjob scene.

It's a completely different thing.

The only thing I can compromise is “This developer may have rehashed the scene shown in version 0.185.”

But your thoughts are your choice.
 
Last edited:
3.20 star(s) 482 Votes