You liked the scene with Julia and the ice cube. Here's what Julia looked like on day 1.
What do you think, she's a minor?
- Thread starter CobraSGT
- Start date
What do you think, she's a minor?
you don't think you should rest a little. You don't leave any comments that criticize the game or the dev without you responding.
who tells you that those who did not like the update are the minority. If you go back and do calculations you will find the opposite. Yes 1600+ supporters. But I bet that there are more than 2000 who are ready to support the game but who hesitate because of all the issues it's experiencing and because of the dev behavior.
- May 2, 2017
- 316
- 236
By increasing the Dylan points to at least 54. For that you can use online save editor.
- Aug 5, 2020
- 33
- 7
[QUOTE = "trinciapapere, post: 6000763, membro: 1857423"]
você pode tentar o jogo paralelo que um cara fez há algum tempo: aqui o jogo paralelo awam . agora alguém poderia plx responder minha pergunta anterior? o material L&P está sujeito à lei de direitos autorais?
[/CITAR]
thanks
você pode tentar o jogo paralelo que um cara fez há algum tempo: aqui o jogo paralelo awam . agora alguém poderia plx responder minha pergunta anterior? o material L&P está sujeito à lei de direitos autorais?
[/CITAR]
thanks
- Feb 14, 2018
- 1,424
- 4,901
I've been all over the fence about the home schooling event but I can't rationalize a different conclusion: it's totally fucked up.
The pupils are portrayed as pre-pubescent children with regards to their understanding of human physiology, even their own. Not plausible. The dialogue can call them "teenagers", the artist can whip out the Kragle and affix some light pubic hair, the artist can flesh out their brow and jawline, amp up the muscle tone morphs, to make them look slightly older. None of that overcomes the fact that the personalities on display are clearly pre-pubescent.
Why is this? L&P wants to include child molestation in his game. Call it Shota, call it Melange, it doesn't matter. While there's a law firm's worth of plausible deniability to argue about, but the fact of the matter is there's no questioning the artist's intent or the result. We are watching Sophia molest children. This is intentional.
Why does L&P want child molesting in his game? I don't know. The answer to that isn't nearly as important to me as why it is being portrayed without malicious intent? Sophia worries about the teacher/student taboo, at one point (and I think only once) thinks to herself "... never mind that they are teenagers ...", and mentions societal boundaries (also once, I think), but the overwhelming hurdle in her mind is that they are her students - that's the taboo for her. Not age.
There's a lot of inner monologue humming and hawing about should I shouldn't I, but none of it is that they are too young for sexual contact.
Why is this? Either we're meant to buy into the "late teenagers" idea that's presented on the surface and it's just kinda creepy but not abhorrent, or, we're deliberately meant to overlook the "late teenagers" language and see them as children being molested by a completely well-intentioned adult.
I think it is deliberately the latter we are meant to take on board, and I think that makes the scene completely ugly and gross: "I did it for their benefit." That, is fucked up.
Last edited:
- May 10, 2017
- 7,322
- 15,915
See and that's the second time ive seen that said. Im not jarring at you btw just saw the post and it reminded me. If they really are special needs that's an even bigger NO NO and she should be arrested that would imply that don't know what's going on fully and she would be taking advantage of them (reverse rape as some would call it) but idk didn't get the scene.
- May 21, 2017
- 726
- 1,861
No I don't really care about the scene with Julia but don't stuff random words into my mouth like so many of you all do to L&P every time he talks. And yes, she's a minor by that picture. Or are you into 1000 year old lolis while we're on this topic?
- May 2, 2017
- 316
- 236
We've had the discussion about the age of some of the protagonists before. And I already said back then who thinks Zac, Dylan and Sam are 18 years old is lying to themselves. And then some of the numbers were calculated nicely to calm their own conscience. People you think the 2nd part-time job is disgusting and want to cancel it. Then be honest and demand the deletion of the strory branches with Sam, Dylan, Zac and Julia.
- Jul 20, 2017
- 15,986
- 99,057
- Jul 20, 2017
- 15,986
- 99,057
56 points are needed and there is also an in game cheat to give you the points
Yea thats the funny part most are forgetting. I saw and should have saved a post from his patreon insulting and raging about his supporters not like it. And i honestly think majority of this update took so long for the one pointless jogging animation. But end result he's making bank and doesn't care. He's like scrooge McDuck swimming in gold.
- Dec 17, 2020
- 594
- 2,418
Your right but wrong
Those branches are for 16+ (in UK thats fine), the wank off kids were 12/13 which basically loli porn. There is a difference.
- Jul 17, 2019
- 5,773
- 14,251
how boring, before it didn't tell well the plot of dylan who had double-crossed aiden, and down complaints so much that the dev removed the plot.
now other troubles with an event that someone does not like and they are already trying to change it.
L&P is already in crisis for piracy, if you make other objections it will cancel the whole game and that's it.
the game is as the developer decides, take it or leave it; (I have adapted too)
now other troubles with an event that someone does not like and they are already trying to change it.
L&P is already in crisis for piracy, if you make other objections it will cancel the whole game and that's it.
the game is as the developer decides, take it or leave it; (I have adapted too)
- May 2, 2017
- 316
- 236
Okay. But I've played it with 55. Do you have any idea when the next update will be released? Though it's too early to ask that
