CREATE YOUR AI CUM SLUT ON CANDY.AI TRY FOR FREE
x

xxxorro

Active Member
Jan 18, 2021
861
10,819
(on subscribestar)

1626265423273.png

So let's go with the wild interpretations: :ROFLMAO:
1626278716887.png

To me it looks like we are watching the scene from Sophia's POV while e.g. she's reading the book as she was doing in non-Dylan's routes before Nat rang the door (the yellowish and whitish part in the upper left corner). Similarly, it could be the case for the previous one with the giant white patch of image on the right.
And Nathalie is giving her the show, maybe some sexy underwear, crotchless panties etc. nexer maybe instead of bringing something in the purse she "forgot" to wear something.. ;)

Obviously this has already happened but it could be something more pushed than this (and maybe, this time, this is only the beginning of the event)
1626265975426.png
 
Last edited:

Alley_Cat

Devoted Member
Jul 20, 2019
9,005
17,576
I kinda preferred shy, nerdy Emma over trendy Emma.
I get that the whole arc was breaking her out of her shell but I just feel like it was done too quickly.
If Emma were to remain on the lesbian route, a slower arc would have been great. But since it turns out Emma is an LI for Dylan, it needed to parallel Dylan/Marie hence the rush job.

Although I have high hopes for Jules. Still has the shyness that Ellie is working on. And has the advantage of getting dripping and almost turning both Parker women. Even Patricia has admitted she thinks Jules is a cutie.
 

nexer

Forum Fanatic
Feb 5, 2019
4,599
18,617
To me it looks like we are watching the scene from Sophia's POV while e.g. she's reading the book as she was doing in non-Dylan's routes before Nat rang the door (the yellowish and whitish part in the upper left corner). Similarly, it could be the case for the previous one with the giant white patch of image on the right.
And Nathalie is giving her the show, maybe some sexy underwear, crotchless panties etc. nexer maybe instead of bringing something in the purse she "forgot" to wear something.. ;)
my quantum AI deblur engine tells me it's something blue.
1626266873040.png
here is something dark red:


Nathalie is wearing Dylan's blue shirt. How cute. :love:
 

Deleted member 3325933

Engaged Member
Jan 30, 2021
2,734
6,771
BTW,
Do the English really put pineapple on pizza? :unsure:
REALLY :eek:
Maybe not the ENGLISH but, Hawaiian pulled pork and pineapple on pizza is the perfect synthesis of Polynesian and Italian foods. Order from Big Kahunas on Oahu. Mmmmmmmmmmmm! Hey, now that I think of it I would love to take Sophia there. Oahu for Waikiki beach to make all the other males in the world jealous. Then hop a ride to the Big Island and helo over the volcano. Followed by a trip to the snow fields around Mauna Kea and some angel making. Topped off by a sunset dinner on a remote Kona beach. Yeah .....:)
 
  • Like
Reactions: nexer

Deleted member 3325933

Engaged Member
Jan 30, 2021
2,734
6,771
She's likely not wearing boots, and her usual uniform will be stored at Sophia's. So if it's a skimpy outfit, that could easily fit. If she's only wearing her apron she wouldn't even need to bring anything extra.

Why do I get the feeling you're implying Liam might be with a male model?
Any model would do. Even a mannequin. Wow, could you see him trying to explain that to Sophia.:ROFLMAO::ROFLMAO::ROFLMAO:
 

Sabertooth__

Well-Known Member
Sep 23, 2020
1,407
7,723
I get why Dylan and Ellie are popular, and certainly some of that is about future potential. It's the cluttered votes at the bottom that I don't understand. A whole bunch of characters that L&P has spent a lot of time trying to develop are under-performing compared to characters that barely exist. If I were a creator, it would bug the hell out of me that the old men were ranked so low because I would feel like I hadn't done a good job endearing them to the audience. Therefore, I would run a poll that targeted these secondary and minor characters more directly in order to better understand my audience. While you don't want to make a game solely based on player feedback, sometimes course correcting isn't a bad thing.
The first problem with the poll is that one can give multiple votes.
Also I don't think it is a failure on the part of L&P in character portrayal, it is firstly the fact that most people are wanting Sophia corrupted and doing extreme stuff, so they vote for they ones with the most potential for that. Majority of the players of the corruption genre are avidly into rape, sexual harassment and forced content, since that is what they get in every game. Even though l&p's game is different there mentally doesn't change. The janitor gets votes because of the whole queen of spades and interracial fetish and the BBC. The fact that the subway thugs got so many votes even though they haven't been seen for so long, again is proof that people like the forced stuff. Liam is the most wholesome route but people are most averse to it.

Secondly the old men are not attractive to begin with, no matter how well they are written, I have no interest in looking at a render with just the two of them in it. The only reason why the storyline is alive is Sophia. In the poll they are not backed by Sophia, on an individual standing they aren't popular, the votes they got this time is most probably because of the bias that they were in the recent update.
 

Alley_Cat

Devoted Member
Jul 20, 2019
9,005
17,576
Nathalie is wearing Dylan's shirt, one of Sophia's fantasies ;)
Other way around methinks. Sophia wearing one of Natalie's shirts is one of Dylan's fantasies. While he is playing with his joystick. Maybe the bonus storyline that we may get.

Did I catch a theory that Nat will be playing with Ellie's joystick? Since Ellie doesn't use it.
 
  • Like
Reactions: nexer

Deleted member 3325933

Engaged Member
Jan 30, 2021
2,734
6,771
(on subscribestar)

View attachment 1297548

So let's go with the wild interpretations: :ROFLMAO:
View attachment 1297559

To me it looks like we are watching the scene from Sophia's POV while e.g. she's reading the book as she was doing in non-Dylan's routes before Nat rang the door (the yellowish and whitish part in the upper left corner). Similarly, it could be the case for the previous one with the giant white patch of image on the right.
And Nathalie is giving her the show, maybe some sexy underwear, crotchless panties etc. nexer maybe instead of bringing something in the purse she "forgot" to wear something.. ;)

Obviously this has already happened but it could be something more pushed than this (and maybe, this time, this is only the beginning of the event)
View attachment 1297562
Just for shits and giggles- the same cover Sophia used at the art class. OR a Lovesense/toy of some manner.
 

Dan5k74

Active Member
Oct 6, 2017
619
3,849
Many here on the forum have expressed that they do not like the second part-time job. For me, what is interesting is that during the lesson, Sophia tells the boys that she will never masturbate a member of her students.
I have a suspicion that she will have to do it. As they say, never say never!

The second point that raises questions for me is that Sofia did not experience absolutely any sexual feelings when touching the members of young guys. From the point of view of teaching ethics, this is completely correct, but after all, Sofia has not had sex in my walkthrough for a long time. She's a temperamental, sensual woman, and not an insensitive piece of wood! Such a cold reaction of hers, in my opinion, is far from realism.

And the third thing I think about is how will she continue the lesson without visuals? After all, then she will need to talk about the female body? Will she show the boys her breasts and vagina?
According to the logic of things, Sofia will need to do this, because she taught the lesson using the boys' bodies as a visual aid, now it is logical to use the female body. She will probably have to use hers if Mrs. Myers' daughter does not come.

And in general it is interesting what will happen in the next lessons, probably Sofia will put a condom on their members and how she will tell them about positions in sex, etc.?

Will Sofia experience sexual arousal as a result of these classes?
What intrigued me the most, however, in the plot development of the second side job is the fact that Sophia, for her next sex education class, will have to bring condoms to the Myers' house.
This might seem like a negligible thing compared to the amount of cues this path can offer, but it sounds to me like yet another Chekhov's gun present in the game (which has now become a veritable ).
Condoms are easy enough to hide from Mrs. Myers' sight: just put them in your pocket and that's it (I don't think, after preventing her from carrying her cell phone and purse, she'll go snooping there, too).
However, I wonder what interest three kids, who have no sexual experience whatsoever, would have in a condom? To anyone who has never had occasion/need to use them, they are nothing more than greasy, smelly balloons, not even good for making water balloons. Do they think Sophia is so clueless as to have sex with them just to show them what she's talking about? Calm down, guys, the Kama Sutra is not one of the lost books of the Old Testament and the pretext of “educational purposes” that Sophia uses to make certain choices is already Dylan's exclusive prerogative (although I must admit it would be fun to see her explain to the three apostles the sexual positions, starting with the missionary one).
For the Myers brothers' characters, more than towards condoms (which for them should represent a marginal curiosity compared to the hundreds of things they don't seem to know about sex), I think it would be more plausible to expect a fervent interest in that divine prodigy who has crashed into their house one boring Wednesday afternoon in the form of a biology teacher and on the chance to see (or maybe touch), through her openness (recklessness), all those things they don't seem to know about the female body.
So why would Sophia buy condoms? Or maybe get them from Liam's nightstand drawer? Most of all, why would she drive around the city carrying condoms in the glove compartment of her car? Will she have the boldness to take them to the Myers' house or will she leave them there?
It almost seems like a narrative device to justify their presence when one day (for whatever reason) her husband will have to take her car or maybe explain their availability, when at a later date, there will be a need for our favorite MILF to use them with any of the various characters in the game (take your pick).
In this regard, I can't help but remember an old video clip from the late 90s where it showed all the misunderstandings, and related consequences, that a simple condom can cause.
Then, regarding the lack of realism, I was surprised by a small incongruence. I refer to the lack of reaction of the Myers brothers in this scene:
screenshot0017.png
Am I wrong or is that "Jesus" equivalent, for good Catholic boys like the Myers brothers are supposed to be, to taking the Lord's name in vain. I'm not sure if it's comparable or not to a real blasphemy (maybe Brother Robert could help), but at least from the younger (and usually more rule-abiding) brothers I would expected a jolt, an expression of astonishment or any other kind of reaction other than the total indifference that follows in the next scene.
But this is a nitpick compared to the mother of all problems... How will Sophia be able to continue her sex education classes without any sort of illustration involved? How can you teach about the female human body without showing an image of a naked woman? Thinking of sneaking in a few adult magazines (maybe just the Dylan ones) seems risky and doomed to failure (Ms. Myers would surely find out and bye-bye to a $300/hour job). Stripping is ethically unacceptable and, as mentioned above, certain excuses only apply to Dylan... So, how can it be done? How can you show yourself naked without actually being naked?
You don't have permission to view the spoiler content. Log in or register now.
Joking aside, some time ago I happened to read about a creative Dutch biology and gym teacher (just like our Sophia) who, in order to stimulate the interest of her young students (usually bored during her human anatomy lessons), thought to wear, under her usual clothes, a bodysuit that reproduced the human muscular system and to strip in front of them to show it directly on her body (here you can find the news reported by and ). In the real world a bodysuit that reproduces the female features is easily available in any online store, but honestly I wouldn't know how this could be reproducible in the 3D graphics world of AWAM (I don't think it's available on Daz or Renderosity).
However, given the modus operandi the developer has adopted so far (more or less all game paths progress at the same rate) I wouldn't be surprised to see something like this to cool down the Myers brothers path that got so heated in the last update.
 

Alley_Cat

Devoted Member
Jul 20, 2019
9,005
17,576
What intrigued me the most, however, in the plot development of the second side job is the fact that Sophia, for her next sex education class, will have to bring condoms to the Myers' house.
This might seem like a negligible thing compared to the amount of cues this path can offer, but it sounds to me like yet another Chekhov's gun present in the game (which has now become a veritable ).
Condoms are easy enough to hide from Mrs. Myers' sight: just put them in your pocket and that's it (I don't think, after preventing her from carrying her cell phone and purse, she'll go snooping there, too).
However, I wonder what interest three kids, who have no sexual experience whatsoever, would have in a condom? To anyone who has never had occasion/need to use them, they are nothing more than greasy, smelly balloons, not even good for making water balloons. Do they think Sophia is so clueless as to have sex with them just to show them what she's talking about? Calm down, guys, the Kama Sutra is not one of the lost books of the Old Testament and the pretext of “educational purposes” that Sophia uses to make certain choices is already Dylan's exclusive prerogative (although I must admit it would be fun to see her explain to the three apostles the sexual positions, starting with the missionary one).
For the Myers brothers' characters, more than towards condoms (which for them should represent a marginal curiosity compared to the hundreds of things they don't seem to know about sex), I think it would be more plausible to expect a fervent interest in that divine prodigy who has crashed into their house one boring Wednesday afternoon in the form of a biology teacher and on the chance to see (or maybe touch), through her openness (recklessness), all those things they don't seem to know about the female body.
So why would Sophia buy condoms? Or maybe get them from Liam's nightstand drawer? Most of all, why would she drive around the city carrying condoms in the glove compartment of her car? Will she have the boldness to take them to the Myers' house or will she leave them there?
It almost seems like a narrative device to justify their presence when one day (for whatever reason) her husband will have to take her car or maybe explain their availability, when at a later date, there will be a need for our favorite MILF to use them with any of the various characters in the game (take your pick).
In this regard, I can't help but remember an old video clip from the late 90s where it showed all the misunderstandings, and related consequences, that a simple condom can cause.
Then, regarding the lack of realism, I was surprised by a small incongruence. I refer to the lack of reaction of the Myers brothers in this scene:
View attachment 1297665
Am I wrong or is that "Jesus" equivalent, for good Catholic boys like the Myers brothers are supposed to be, to taking the Lord's name in vain. I'm not sure if it's comparable or not to a real blasphemy (maybe Brother Robert could help), but at least from the younger (and usually more rule-abiding) brothers I would expected a jolt, an expression of astonishment or any other kind of reaction other than the total indifference that follows in the next scene.
But this is a nitpick compared to the mother of all problems... How will Sophia be able to continue her sex education classes without any sort of illustration involved? How can you teach about the female human body without showing an image of a naked woman? Thinking of sneaking in a few adult magazines (maybe just the Dylan ones) seems risky and doomed to failure (Ms. Myers would surely find out and bye-bye to a $300/hour job). Stripping is ethically unacceptable and, as mentioned above, certain excuses only apply to Dylan... So, how can it be done? How can you show yourself naked without actually being naked?
You don't have permission to view the spoiler content. Log in or register now.
Joking aside, some time ago I happened to read about a creative Dutch biology and gym teacher (just like our Sophia) who, in order to stimulate the interest of her young students (usually bored during her human anatomy lessons), thought to wear, under her usual clothes, a bodysuit that reproduced the human muscular system and to strip in front of them to show it directly on her body (here you can find the news reported by and ). In the real world a bodysuit that reproduces the female features is easily available in any online store, but honestly I wouldn't know how this could be reproducible in the 3D graphics world of AWAM (I don't think it's available on Daz or Renderosity).
However, given the modus operandi the developer has adopted so far (more or less all game paths progress at the same rate) I wouldn't be surprised to see something like this to cool down the Myers brothers path that got so heated in the last update.
That's where you're drawing the line? At condoms? Realism and class went straight out the window after shooting itself in the head at Sophia jerking them off. Sophia should lose her teaching license and face jail time after that event.
 

Talcum Powder

Well-Known Member
Feb 14, 2018
1,424
4,901
I'm tired of these stupid accusations. I can't understand what kind of shit should be in head instead of brain, so as not to understand that I'm not accusing anyone and I'm not defending anyone, but I'm expressing my personal opinion.
I repeat, unlike you and others like you, who call direct accusations criticism, which in itself is utter stupidity, I am trying to be objective and would be glad if they really expressed criticism, but not accusations! We are on a forum dedicated to the game that L&P creates, not you! If you don't like it, what kind of dick are you doing here? A simple question arises.

I will try to explain the situation to you with an example! Imagine that you are fucking your girlfriend in a city square. People see you, some look at you, some pass by, but there are assholes like you, they come up to you and start telling you that you are doing something wrong.
That you need to turn your girlfriend over, put in a different position, the other says that she has one leg shorter, the third claims that she has crooked teeth, while you like her and her smile and gait.
You don't ask them for any favors, but they think that they, like the best Casanovas, have the right to tell you how to fuck your girlfriend! This is how the situation looks from the outside, you have the role of these assholes who bother you in the square.

If you are here on the forum because you like the game, then have some respect for its creator! Although I can’t understand it all the same.

For example, I do not like other games and you will not find my comments somewhere on the forum, where I would convince the public that the developer is doing something wrong, that he is a cheat or something like that.
Your ego is inflated to incredible proportions and obscures your mind and prevents you from understanding simple truths.
Therefore, I have nothing more to discuss with you.

P.S. Despite the complete disagreement with your statements, the problem of this post is not to scold you, but to explain to you my vision of the situation.
All the best!
Hi Bane71 - The fucking in public is a very good analogy in one sense, but I don't think you realize how much of a "shooting yourself in the foot" moment this is for your opinion on L&P. Fucking (or doing anything) in public is exactly the type of activity that forfeits any presumption of privacy. Assholes and admirers alike are perfectly within their rights to express opinions directly to the fuckers as well as have discussions amongst themselves about the quality of the fucking, what they like and don't like about the fucking, and whether sticking her finger in his ass would enhance the spectacle.

Let's try a different approach: Imagine a premium television subscription service that published the most amazing program ever known to mankind. The first year or two they released episodes every couple of months that covered a day or two and introduced a lot of characters and story arcs and potential. In year three it started extending the time between releases from a couple of months to three or four months and instead of covering a full day it reduced to 1/2 a day but the production quality went up even higher and the episodes became more focused on specific elements of the story. You see where this is going ...

Folks who subscribe to the premium service and pay the monthly fee, well that's one thing. But let's say these episodes are leaked online, too. Folks who accessed the program online and not through the premium service have their own discussion amongst themselves about the program overall, the latest episode, and the occasional pigeon.

On what planet does it make any sense for the creator(s) of the program to listen in on that discussion that is in no way affiliated or directly linked to the premium service, and get upset about what is said during that conversation?

I'll put forward my guess on what planet: Earth. Because the creator(s) knows there is potentially a much larger audience that may be willing and able to subscribe to the premium service. If that's the reason for participating in the side discussion then it might be incumbent upon the creator to either take that conversation with a grain of salt or take that conversation as substantive even if, at times, it devolves into vulgarity and insult.

L&P has apparently chosen a third option, which is to tell the side conversation to fuck off. The end result of his decision is that he's the one who fucked off from here and the conversation continues.
 
Last edited:
3.20 star(s) 489 Votes