That's not what I meant. I was thinking more about whether these choices have an effect on how Sophia decides, at least in dialogue, who rejects Sam at the beginning of the next Sam event.
I think this has taken a dark turn in my opinion. It needs to remain more even and positive - both Liam and Sophia are players in this little drama but we don't get into Liam's head. It's clear he would agree to having a more open relationship. There are others potentially involved too as we all know. Lots of side issues driving the action from mostly only Sophia's perspective. So, we don't know where this is going quite yet, I have not got any solid impressions on how this will end but I can't imagine it will quite so negative and dark - it should and could (certainly in my opinion) be something that develops for both Sophia and Liam (et al) with some side influences not being "disclosed" to all parties at once, but perhaps becoming clearer in time. I don't really want to think about Sophia being some sullied cum dumpster living in abject poverty and despair (where did that come from?) in just a couple of weeks of game time - instead it will hopefully be more of a comfortable evolution, with good sexy outcomes and positive atmosphere - with certainly some challenging speed-bumps along the way. I trust (going out on a limb here) that our Sophia will have some growth and adventures, but nothing too decrepit or decadent.
Right, this is where we discuss how far L&P will let us play with Sophia, how long the chain will be.That's not what I meant. I was thinking more about whether these choices have an effect on how Sophia decides, at least in dialogue, who rejects Sam at the beginning of the next Sam event.
But since we control Sophia's decisions, we know how it will turn out in the end.
Sophia will have some growth and adventures, but nothing too decrepit or decadent.
I have the impression there is no chain. L&P tries very hard not to create complicated causal chains that make programming life difficult for him. That may not bother most of them, but it does me.Right, this is where we discuss how far L&P will let us play with Sophia, how long the chain will be.
I even wrote an L&P post as it seemed to me he cut out a certain amount of renders. But he told me that he hadn't cut anything.
We don't have to accept the limit set by L&P, we can set our own limit so that the process is to our liking.
Except when he blocked the players choice concerning Tyler and this could happen again
Generally sex means the act of having sex and sexual acts could mean the foreplay and other stuff. But we are not sure of what L&P exactly means by sex scenes. He has listed an abundance of them in the next 3-4 days, but the thing is there hasn't even been a proper handjob scene in the game. So expecting full on sex straight away, seems weird. Maybe by sex he is referring to oral sex and other acts or maybe there is an actual sex scene soon. Nobody really knows
Along the same lines that Sabertooth__ wrote
The problem is that if L&P increased the corruption of Sophia slowly and "realistically" (with the suspension of disbelief required that this a porn novel trying to tell the transition from naïve and straight laced housewife to incestual sex in 30 playable days) in the way that many of us loved up to Playable Day 11, then it could well take L&P another 18-20 years to finish this story without help.
No and as far as I am concerned he has already lost what made this game so good and that is a shame and one of the reasons why I am no longer a patron of his
Am I the only one who liked the Tyler scene?
Ouch, did an old canine get out of the wrong side of bed this morning??!! That is a bit harsh for Sophia, who has certainly pushed the boundaries of being a loyal and loving housewife so far, but has nt YET crossed the Rubicon. At the end of the day it is OUR choices that determine what Sophia does and thus it would be OUR fault if we devastate the people who mean the most to her.
