Is that what I said about Sam, which you see as bullshit? Or is it what I said about dylan? i just said what i see right to sam fans who don't want to see the obvious facts in the game (he will be angry again
) what's wrong with it, what i wrote here is not to defend dylan. By the way, what I wrote in that post was for both sam and dylan fans.
First of all, I have never heard of a son setting up his mother through stupidity in the manner that it is written. I would disagree that it was his strongest idea, as it was executed poorly. Maybe it could have been played out differently if the twist was executed towards the end of the story, but it's my understanding is that the twist would have remained hidden, and only came to light if Dylan was sent to boarding school. This is along the line of setting her up for good intentions, which leads to Dylan being involved with indirect blackmail, as he was the one who caused it in the first place.
No, Dylan did not assume he was a school bully. Dylan knew who Aiden was and his background.
And after the classroom scene with Aiden, Andre, and Jennifer, I would have to say Aiden clearly fits the description of a sociopath criminal if you consider what he is doing with Sophia and what he did with Jennifer. Jennifer was subject to both Blackmail and Rape, and Aiden was completely fine with it. That is sociopath behavior.Maybe there was more to the twist, I don't know. But in the manner it was executed, it made no sense at all. There were no hints or anything in the story at that time, and even now, to suggest a "Mid-Life" crisis. And to have Dylan try to justify his actions as seeing a "Mid-Life" with Sophia had me scratching my head and trying to figure out what he was talking about in the story.
The twist may have worked with better story planning, but who knows. I couldn't tell you because he continues to change his script. But because he executed "The Twist," in my opinion at the wrong time, I believe it was the right call to remove it. And I agree that he would have to admit to making a mistake, which he doesn't do at all.
It was in the novel at one point, about two years ago, but was removed because of bad reviews L&P was getting from members.
Well then we are in agreement!First of all, I have never heard of a son setting up his mother through stupidity in the manner that it is written. I would disagree that it was his strongest idea, as it was executed poorly. Maybe it could have been played out differently if the twist was executed towards the end of the story, but it's my understanding is that the twist would have remained hidden, and only came to light if Dylan was sent to boarding school. This is along the line of setting her up for good intentions, which leads to Dylan being involved with indirect blackmail, as he was the one who caused it in the first place.
No, Dylan did not assume he was a school bully. Dylan knew who Aiden was and his background.
You don't have permission to view the spoiler content. Log in or register now.
Aiden was more than a bully. When Sophia goes to the police and finds out about Aiden's background, his background was elevated from a bully to a criminal. If L&P was going to write him as a bully, he should have omitted the criminal background part from Aiden. That is like calling Don Morello a fair and honorable businessman.
HZjujk Quote: On the main route so the statement of L&P this betrayal of Dylan to his mother should not play a role any more.
Sorry, but that would be incorrect. For Example: If Person A talked to Person B about robbing a cash dispenser, and Person B robs the cash dispenser but decides to rob person C too, however, he ends up getting shot by person C to stop him and injures him. Person A would be responsible for Person B getting shot because he conspired with him to rob the cash dispenser, which he knew was wrong in the first place. If Person A never spoke with Person B, then Person C would have never shot Person B.
That is the same thing with Dylan and Aiden. Dylan knew who Aiden and Uncle were, but he approached and conspired with Aiden to make the deal. But Aiden took the deal further and acted on his own, and applied the twelve tasks rule to Sophia. Although Dylan didn't know about the twelve tasks, he is indirectly responsible for them because he's the one who planned and approached Aiden.
Just because Aiden injected the twelve tasks into the deal without Dylan's knowledge doesn't absolve Dylan of any responsibility for Aiden's actions.
Dylan wasn't a loser per se, The author said he excelled at sports, soccer, and computers. The problem the author said Dylan has is approaching and talking to women, and his class. If Dylan was a loser then saying that he excelled at sports and computer literacy is moot and should have never been written in the novel.
The "sadistic character trait of Aiden in the last two updates." takes me back to my other comment on sociopath behavior.
Maybe there was more to the twist, I don't know. But in the manner it was executed, it made no sense at all. There were no hints or anything in the story at that time, and even now, to suggest a "Mid-Life" crisis. And to have Dylan try to justify his actions as seeing a "Mid-Life" with Sophia had me scratching my head and trying to figure out what he was talking about in the story.
So this brings me back to my point that "The Twist" was executed poorly.
The twist may have worked with better story planning, but who knows. I couldn't tell you because he continues to change his script. But because he executed "The Twist," in my opinion at the wrong time, I believe it was the right call to remove it. And I agree that he would have to admit to making a mistake, which he doesn't do at all.
The differences in your and my argumentation I see in your translation of my contribution or my bad English.
I don't know if you could say that Dylan didn't know about Aiden's criminal history. Aiden and Zac are in the same class, and for Dylan to make that connection in the confession that he knew of Aiden and his uncle would have to come from Zac since he was part of the plan.
I have the feeling that the shotas are the ones pulling the strings.
Then he must forfeit all other task after number 4.
No it's not. The game is "A Wife and Mother". You might be playing a different game than me.
If you play the Ellie and Patricia routes, that's the closest to lesbian only. There's a link to the walkthrough I made for it in the OP. There are still a couple of dicks seen, and Sophia does need to flirt with some guys to maintain Filthy > GW, so it's not what some would consider a purely "lesbian route".
In my opinion, the flirting (with men) makes no sense in the lesbian-only route, considering the fact that you (FMC) are trying to go for only women, it should not even be needed, and you should gain filthy when you get interested, spyed, touched (sexually) and so on, a woman. And yes in my opinion it is a lesbian route even if we consider the dicks you see and the flirting with men, as you don't need to do anything with them.
).
SOME Sam fans could well be described as toxic.
You should really pay attention to L&P's GTA reference on why certain things happen in his novel that doesn't make sense.In my opinion, the flirting (with men) makes no sense in the lesbian-only route, considering the fact that you (FMC) are trying to go for only women, it should not even be needed, and you should gain filthy when you get interested, spyed, touched (sexually) and so on, a woman. And yes in my opinion it is a lesbian route even if we consider the dicks you see and the flirting with men, as you don't need to do anything with them.
PS: And I really hope you can keep the daughter only for you and Julia, and she does not do it with her boyfriend, I really liked the mother-daughter content (although I don't have much hope for it
This is the frustrating thing about L&P's forum posts - they are opaque enough that if he subsequently contradicts what he had implied before, he can state, seemingly without irony, that "I never said that".....
