- Jul 3, 2021
- 1,877
- 11,743
- Thread starter CobraSGT
- Start date
- Jan 20, 2022
- 242
- 592
For some unknown reason, this game is becoming uninteresting.......
- Jul 17, 2019
- 5,782
- 14,267
Finally some good old stranger groping/corruption content
- Aug 24, 2021
- 208
- 614
- Apr 23, 2017
- 2,435
- 18,596
I don't know if he understands that we are past the original deadline L&P set for his game, and I don't think he understands why the game is bloated now and why the rendered quantity is bouncing around if you want to take L&P's word for it.
You don't have permission to view the spoiler content.
Log in or register now.
- Jun 11, 2020
- 8,851
- 30,141
- Feb 14, 2018
- 1,424
- 4,901
I'm not sure why a simple demonstration of the data (which is not being contested, by the way) is getting folks so worked up. Love or loathe the game, love or loathe the story, love or loathe the art, but for goodness' sake let's not quibble about reality.
No, as Jack Adams posted earlier, it's per release and does not account for the time between releases. It is release-dependent, not date-dependent. Notice that the dates on the primary x-axis (bottom) align with the release numbers on the secondary x-axis (top).
You've plotted the trend of the cumulative average, which even in your visualization is sloping down. The trendline I included is the linear trend for avg renders per day per release, non-cumulative. If you're looking at 6+ years of data, comprising 13,600 renders over 2,400 days, and both the per-release trend and cumulative trend are pointing down, then production is unquestioningly slowing.
Becoming? It's been uninteresting for years. No sex in an AVN = boring as fuck.
- Feb 14, 2018
- 1,424
- 4,901
To be fair, splitting the game's development into part 1 and part 2 does show that part 1 was relatively stable (cumulative avg dipped only slightly) and part 2's cumulative trend is trending slightly upwards.
- Aug 24, 2021
- 208
- 614
Yes, exactly. Otherwise you ignore big chunk of the data.
Since the updates are no equal in size this is the only way to show the trend. Please bear in mind that the no. of renders per year stays fairly consistent although splits in 2 separate groups.
Last edited:
- Mar 19, 2019
- 1,029
- 2,248
- Jan 25, 2021
- 1,714
- 4,106
"of renders per year stays fairly consistent" ???
You don't have permission to view the spoiler content.
Log in or register now.
If look at the small dotted line, it's a downward trend, if look at the large dotted line, it's a downward trend, and if look at the bar chart, it's even worse. What on earth is this person looking at?
How can this person not see that black area?
You don't have permission to view the spoiler content.
Log in or register now.
- Sep 27, 2019
- 1,601
- 35,221
Progress Report Ver. 0.205
35% - 30% - 0%
0% - 0% - 0%
35% - 30% - 0%
0% - 0% - 0%
- Sep 1, 2022
- 911
- 3,941
My question is: Does this update have 400 renders approximately and LP is going fast or there are less than 250 renders in this update…?
- Aug 24, 2021
- 208
- 614
I am not going to go through all of this again. everything is here. Go and read.
I hope the former
The images in the new addition are of the highest level.
LP is trying.
It didn't work out well with the mirror.
Let's see what happens in the release.
You'll have to wait 3 months, but that's reality. All updates for good games come out once every 4-12 months.
P.S.
Tried "Perfect Marriage"
I really liked the story of 100 points. I'm waiting for no less than AWAM
Definitely also amazing but she has been shafted for a long time. Really hope. The dev delivers some major Progression for her like he did with Ellie
- Jan 25, 2021
- 1,714
- 4,106
I've already seen enough of your stupidity.
Whether you look at it as a performance chart or a stock chart, what that chart means is that the “trend is down.”
If you had focused on other people's explanations, you would have realized sooner how absurd your explanation was.
The thick dotted line is the average over 7 years.
But you are dividing this into Part 1 and Part 2. (Arithmetic is not done that way.)
If you wanted to divide the trend line into Part 1 and Part 2, you should have calculated the average value separately into Part 1 and Part 2.
- And if calculate the average for Part 2 separately, do not get 5.67. (Try it yourself.)
(Of course, when the average value changes, the shape of the trend line also changes.)
You really don't know anything.
You have serious problems.