- Dec 9, 2020
- 196
- 1,056
Ok, I don't want to start a flame war. Let's agree that life is life and games are games.Well, please tell me, if the author drew a murder in a computer game, does he deserve to be punished, to be put in prison?
Probably not.
So why should there be consequences in the case of other drawings?
That's what I'm talking about, not the designation of the term fetish that the author draws.
I don't speak English, maybe it prevents me from expressing my thoughts more clearly, but I think your example is very revealing. For murders in computer games, the authors do not bear the consequences, and in other cases, moralists insist that the authors bear the consequences. This is a kind of suffrage. Now it is fashionable in Western countries.
Just one thing: we were talking (I think) about consequences for game characters, not for authors of the drawings. It was about Sophia who was corrupting ca. 12 y.o. kids, touching their dicks. And her behaviour was commented in the original post, not of the L&P (it was only stated that Sophia's behaviour could result from L&P's own fetishes. Which I basically disagree with; to me Sophia's behaviour stems from L&P's love of money, not his fetishes).
Consequences for L&P are not my cup of tea; 'the Patreon police' takes care of it (I'm just surprised that L&P is ready to walk on this thin ice but this is a separate issue).