LordLegolas

The Lord of the Leaks
Uploader
Aug 6, 2021
5,722
82,761
OP Updated

Added 2024-12 + Compressed

mirror for now
Saeko set is unfinished as well I think, parts 1-2 also

SET_LunaSnow_2_Cooked_2_2_WM.jpg SEX_IsobelXAylin_1_Panel2_Cum2_COOKED_WM.jpg PINUP_AlexXenakis_1_2_WM.jpg
you know it's bad when it compresses 4gb into 80mb without me touching quality or resolution :p
Thanks dumbvader

Added Futa tag for Aylin
 

Reaper9988

Member
Donor
Sep 25, 2021
498
1,093
yea, this is her anti-piracy strat, spam leakers with heavy pngs :KEK:
if regular subs can't download either, their problem I guess :whistle:
Actually I wonder what Program is used. The pictures have a bit depth of 64 at 16 per channel in Photoshop there seems to be an extra channel there. Losing that would save like half the size. Also maybe that's just my monitor but I don't see why the pics need to be 16 bit. 8 Bit per channels(so 24 or 32 bit depth ) would bring down the size to about 10% -15% of what is now, without any compression.
Maybe it's really an elaborate scheme :unsure:
 

LordLegolas

The Lord of the Leaks
Uploader
Aug 6, 2021
5,722
82,761
Actually I wonder what Program is used. The pictures have a bit depth of 64 at 16 per channel in Photoshop there seems to be an extra channel there. Losing that would save like half the size. Also maybe that's just my monitor but I don't see why the pics need to be 16 bit. 8 Bit per channels(so 24 or 32 bit depth ) would bring down the size to about 10% -15% of what is now, without any compression.
Maybe it's really an elaborate scheme :unsure:
yea, color depth adds a lot of size, but does nothing on 99.9% of monitors
png to jpg, yes, you will sometimes notice slight lose in colors, but for 60mb into 1mb, totally worth

optimal size for 4k pngs, looking at top artists, is 8-12mb, with 24, max 32 bits.
She does 64, and if I'm not mistaken about how it works, it QUADRUPLES the size, not doubles, without any difference in image quality.

- x10 size between 64 and 32, but literal ZERO difference across the board

And it's XnConvert, not even Photoshop, Photoshop maybe will do a better job
 
  • Like
Reactions: Reaper9988

ZedGee

Newbie
Oct 23, 2019
91
93
I used Irfanview and it was still good too. I find what Akkon doing a bit stupid tbh.
 

Reaper9988

Member
Donor
Sep 25, 2021
498
1,093
yea, color depth adds a lot of size, but does nothing on 99.9% of monitors
png to jpg, yes, you will sometimes notice slight lose in colors, but for 60mb into 1mb, totally worth

optimal size for 4k pngs, looking at top artists, is 8-12mb, with 24, max 32 bits.
She does 64, and if I'm not mistaken about how it works, it QUADRUPLES the size, not doubles, without any difference in image quality.

Quick example with Helen pic - x10 size between 64 and 32, but literal ZERO difference across the board

And it's XnConvert, not even Photoshop, Photoshop maybe will do a better job
Oh I notice colour differences there, but that's because XnConvert lost the colour management Profile and Imageglass(my usual viewer) uses it. In Photoshop it looks the same(Uses my monitors colour setting).
By that I noticed it uses a Gimp Colour Profile so my thinking it's just rendered out without any postwork is a no, must have been used in Gimp at some point.

So just for giggles here is one at 32 bit with (useless Alpha channel) and colour profile in Gimp.
And one 24 bit no colour profile from Photoshop.
Just to be fair I even turned on HDR(And I hate HDR) and no difference either. Would be the wrong file type anyways.
It's really a bit silly for their Patrons hard drives too.

And yeah I see no difference in the JPG either just a tick from me that I like things uncompressed if possible lol
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: LordLegolas