- Jan 21, 2022
- 11,729
- 22,966
- 913
Okay. You think it is right. But are you the average person? No, you are not. The average person does NOT play adult video games with sexually graphic content in them. The average person is not going to agree with you that rape and incest content in video games is what they want available.Sure I am being subjective, but this has EVERYTHING to do with what folks think is right. We have arrived at this point because other people are using all their power to put in place systems regarding what they think is right to the detriment of others.
you are being far too objective, far too nonchalant about thousands of devs games getting shadowbanned, about whole tags hidden away. It's a whole bunch of people who have lost one of the biggest platforms and you only seem to care about shrugging and saying "it's legal". Like I'm autistic and struggle with empathy, but even I think you come across as very cold and inhuman with the stringency that you place upon being legally correct without any regards for the actual people.
Like we get it, you're better than us because you can look at the "facts" and stay "objective" about what is "legal" and care about all the businesses bottom lines, while we're all getting turned inside out by the payment processors and folks are at risk of loosing their streams of income.
I am not being nonchalant. It's not about empathy.
It is about business and the law.
I am sorry if you cannot accept that - but business is not run on empathy. It is run on money and that money is highly regulated and in demand. And businesses make decisions which maximize profits while minimizing liabilities.
Believing you are on the right side of an issue (whether or not you are) doesn't change public perception. It doesn't change business decisions. It doesn't change laws.
Again, you are being hypocritical -- you keep talking about "folks are at risk" by this decision. They made their decision when they made their content and put it on itch when itch's rules said specifically to not put that content on the site.
Developers can put whatever they want in their games (that is legal). They have that right.
Funding Platforms can put whatever they want on their site (that is legal). They have that right.
Payment Processors can decide whatever services they will provide (that is legal). They have that right.
If the first 1 wants to do business with the second 1 --- they have to agree to the rules of that second 1.
If the second 1 wants to do business with the last 1 -- they have to agree to the rules of that last 1.
SCOTUS precedent about pornography is 50 years old (and 40 years old - depending up the cite). There are current justices who want to revisit that precedent (and others) like they did with Roe v. Wade in order to turn them over. That is not going to change for quite a few years (6 conservative, 3 liberal justices --- majority rules). Notice in the recent decision about age verification - it was the 6 conservatives (3 Trump appointed) who upheld the age verification - the 3 liberals opposed. So, no, it's not unknown. It's very known where the justices would fall. Especially with the "written/unwritten" policy platform for this administration that includes the sentiment to ban porn.I agree with you on the practical reality of the matter. But I agree with you only because the Supreme Court's attitude to pornography as a speech to still kinda unknown at the moment, the recent age verification case has Supreme court ruled in favor of restriction, but the same court also acknowledges porn as speech. So who know about taboo subject porn as a matter of free speech.
I think things are only "political suicide" if you could be shamed. Since Trump won repeatedly, I would argue that liberals should start to learn to be shameless.
Porn is political suicide in this climate. 17 states have passed or in the process of passing those age verification requirements. Sex (preferences, identity, activities) have been highly weaponized in this political climate by conservatives to label opponents as pedophiles and predators and groomers and etc etc etc.
I do not disagree with your final sentence.