A quick comparison between CCBill and paypal? How much more would their charges be? And why High-risk?You have to go with a High-Risk Payment Prosser like CC bill you can also do crypto but the average joe six pack is not going to use it
the point is, that Patreon doesn't want porn content on their platform anymore ( even though it became this famous and prolificent MAINLY because of porn material...), so they're "passively" kicking us out with impossible rules.hi first of all can someone tell what give me an update on DMD patreon issues ? .
Look i think the first step to be honest is basically Collective bargaining ( or whatever it's equivalent online ) . group as many creators together as possible and have them negotiate together instead of Patreon dealing with you one by one , i mean even DMD , one of the most profitable creators had to abide by Patreon rules .
Any porn is deemed a high risk category by most credit card processors. The chance of fraud is considerably higher and there are more risks involved, especially when taboo content ventures into illegality or when you're hit by legal claims pertaining the content you're bankrolling. So most banks are not willing to fund. CCBill and others are established players in the porn market and don't have any qualms about most major porn genres (including BDSM and step-sibling incest).A quick comparison between CCBill and paypal? How much more would their charges be? And why High-risk?
It might be that Stripe hasn't been alerted by the content MakerSupport offers and as of yet it's mostly political stuff. It's going to be interesting when DS actually transfers to MakerSupport. Hopefully they can work something out. A platform hosted by F95 would of course be even more awesome.I was talking to someone in this thread about maker support a few weeks ago. He was saying that they haven't expressed any concern yet over any type of adult content. I hear what you're saying with stripe, so it could just be a matter of time, but I'm choosing optimism. Like I said DS is actually speaking with them directly about it, so he'll get a definitive answer
Yeah, a lot of those high risk services do. On the other hand, there's a lot of full-motion step-sibling porn being cranked out, so if that's allowed it's a small matter of modding the "step" part out. As for bestiality, rape and underage content, that will still remain a problem, but it's illegal anyway. You can debate the illegality of a lewd computer generated character looking like a minor, but that nuance isn't something most companies want to deal with.Ccbill also prohibits rape bestiality incest and fictional underage content. They're no better than PayPal.
In many places bestiality with an animal over something like 26 lbs is legal. I don't know if it's legal to film, but computer generated bestiality should definitely not be held to that standard. As to the nuances, I actually don't care about the "no one is getting hurt" argument, because its the weaker argument. The real argument is that the existence of a nonviolent release prevents violent actions. This applies to rape, this applies to underage content. I'm not saying we should promote pedophilia and rape, but censoring it simply causes the people who need it to go elsewhere.Any porn is deemed a high risk category by most credit card processors. The chance of fraud is considerably higher and there are more risks involved. Especially when taboo content ventures into illegality or when you're hit by legal claims pertaining the content you're bankrolling. So most banks are not willing to fund. CCBill and others are established players in the porn market and don't have any qualms against most major porn genres (including BDSM and step-sibling incest).
It might be that Stripe hasn't been alerted by the content MakerSupport offers and as of yet it's mostly political stuff. It's going to be interesting when DS actually transfers to MakerSupport. Hopefully they can work something out. A platform hosted by F95 would of course be even more awesome.
Yeah, a lot of those high risk services do. On the other hand, there's a lot of full-motion step-sibling porn being cranked out, so if that's allowed it's a small matter of modding the "step" part out. As for bestiality, rape and underage content, that will still remain a problem, but it's illegal anyway. You can debate the illegality of a lewd computer generated character looking like a minor, but that nuance isn't something most companies want to deal with.
I agree! But it's sadly easier for companies to just blanket-ban anything that smells of illegality.This applies to rape, this applies to underage content. I'm not saying we should promote pedophilia and rape, but censoring it simply causes the people who need it to go elsewhere.
I would say it isn't the same. But the whole Patreon shitstorm that's been going on for more than half a year now sadly proves otherwise. It comes down to a review committee to decide what's acceptable and what's not. If I read Patreon's content guidelines correctly, you can write a regular novel or comic where incest or even rape is part of the story (as is the case with Game of Thrones or Lolita) and Patreon will allow it on their platform. If you're including it in an adult VN, and you're including it so your readers can fap to it, they will ban it.What I'm not sure about either: I understand the real people implications, but are artistic depictions of it illegal too? Can't be the same. That's why it shouldn't be so "high risk" from my perspective.
The risk makes perfect sense to me. The problem is that repressed middle american housewife who gets the creditcard bill and goes to her husband mad asking what the fuck and he denies it so they claim it was a false charge.What I'm not sure about either: I understand the real people implications, but are artistic depictions of it (incest or whatever) illegal too? Can't be the same. That's why it shouldn't be so "high risk" from my perspective.
My point is that it's the argument against censorship from a legal stance. If the law reflected the science then we'd only have to contend with the risk aversion. Hell, it could be considered ableism to deny those who need it the content. You see, it's illegal to discriminate against people for mental health reasons. If you allowed adult content at all and didn't allow adult content that serviced people with the mental health issue of pedophilia for example you would be liable for discriminating.I agree! But it's sadly easier for companies to just blanket-ban anything that smells of illegality.
If that were true they wouldn't be so specific about the type of porn. Verotel used to handle processing for the sickest porn coming out of the Netherlands, including bestiality, simply because there was money in it. Visa and mastercard shut them down though even while it was still legal (no longer).It has nothing to do with branding. Paypal has a strict policy on issuing refunds and porn is notorious for it. This is why legit porn was the first to go.
If some processor could be found then you could use prepaid cards to setup a balance, even with 20+% fees that would be easier for people than using cryptocurrency. Even with cryptocurrency there is still the problem of where to incorporate. Especially with 3D rendering and ageplay the number of suitable countries is tiny.That said, no adult oriented charge is going to show up on peoples credit cards willingly so any adult based patreon is going to work. Your better off making a bitcoin based patreon since the transactions do not appear on your bank wallet, but bitcoin one instead.
There's nothing secret. I'd just give money to somebody else. I'm NOT buying anything. Who cares if the person I send money to also happen to develop adult games, have black hair or vote for a left-wing candidate in their free time? I doubt Paypal can block an account because of some circumstantial evidence.And secretly using Paypal for private donations is just waiting to get busted by them, because it won't stay secret forever.
Well, I admit that it may be only my wrong impression, because I don't have personal experience with that, but I did read some stories about Paypal being a little nosy. It's not about yours, but about developer's account. Personal account receiving few thousand dollars every month in small payments does look suspicious. "Oh no, I'm not selling anything, people just send me money, because I'm cool guy" would not be very believable explanation.There's nothing secret. I'd just give money to somebody else. I'm NOT buying anything. Who cares if the person I send money to also happen to develop adult games, have black hair or vote for a left-wing candidate in their free time?
I agree, it could easily look like the account is being used by a drug dealer or for some other illegal usage and I'm pretty sure that companies like Paypal actively monitor for things like that.Personal account receiving few thousand dollars every month in small payments does look suspicious. "Oh no, I'm not selling anything, people just send me money, because I'm cool guy" would not be very believable explanation.