Take from devs a possibility of passive subscription income for doing nothing/remaking/endless milking with lame teasing for braindead morons, devs get money only after finishing the game or season full of content, and you will see that even Super Alex will start to fully finish his games in a 3-4 year span, or he will drop it because he DING, DING! Was a 100% lazy scammer all this time and just wanted to have passive income from gullible losers with minimal working effort and not actually working as intended from someone who asks for money for his work.
And what do you mean he's doing a poor job of it? This dude in the industry is more than 7 years. It's not a young newbie who saw program code for the first time in his life a few months ago and published his first-ever work. If he didn't learn for all this time how to develop a game quickly and effectively, then he isn't worth a penny from support. And I didn't even once imply there are only two groups of devs and nothing else, etc. I don't know why you wrote that)
"And what do you mean he's doing a poor job of it?" I mean that the effort he's putting into an unnecessary remake/remaster is unneeded and a waste of time. I think he's trying to salvage his game from the horrible limbo state it's in via this remaster, which is only going to make matters worse. But the fact that he's doing this remaster doesn't automatically make him a scammer. Scammers want to do the least amount of work to make the most amount of money--probably a lot easier to keep stringing subscribers via other means rather than invest in a remake/remaster. Even just randomly throwing in sex scenes that break the story would be easier than pursuing a remaster. If anything, remasters usually scare people away.
"This dude in the industry is more than 7 years . . . If he didn't learn for all this time . . . then he isn't worth a penny of support." Entirely agree. And that's why I don't support him. But based on your comments elsewhere, I get the impression you just think he's stringing all the guppies along (and you might be right).
However, the fact that he's not developed better organizational skills in all that time does not automatically make him a scammer. He might just be too dumb to learn; he might just be lazy. Just because someone is not the most brilliant or organized developer, or just because they're developing their game slowly . . . veryyyy slowly, in this case . . . doesn't make them a scammer. What if a programmer makes adult games as a side hobby and can only produce updates rarely? What would you get with a horrible developer who can produce updates only rarely, but that dev is a great artist? You'd probably get updates that unfortunately look like scams.
"And I didn't even once imply there are only two groups of devs and nothing else, etc. I don't know why you wrote that)." Based on my previous explanations, it should be obvious now why I said this. I think you're throwing "scammer" around too loosely.
But this is a moot discussion. All I'm saying is I'm not convinced he's a scammer. I think he's just a super bad developer but exceptional artist, so that's why I don't support him. He's either just a bad developer or a scammer, as you've implied. In either case, not worthy of monetary support.