Ok, but actually irrelevant to my comments. I recognize that some people like the unethical doctor content.
Actually, she is . . . as currently written. At the beginning of the scene, the text says she's "under anesthesia," which means she's unconscious. She wakes up shortly after the "friend" does and expresses no knowledge of where she is or how she got there. He then insists he talk to her alone and precedes to tell her the consequences of her head trauma.
But, "under anesthesia" means she's unconscious. Maybe it's a translation problem. I don't know if English is your first language. Aside from the fact that they don't give head trauma patients anesthesia, people don't usually wake up so quickly after being "under anesthesia." It happens slowly and there's often several minutes of disorientation and confusion, followed by a mild realization of your surroundings that increases as the person comes out of it--in what would normally be a busy recovery area monitored by nurses and doctors, not a private room. No one ever "recovers" from being under anesthesia in a private room.
So, when the doctor is initially touching her, she's presented as unconscious. I guess him fondling her was just supposed to be a set-up for his mindset later . . . OK. His feelings could have been expressed in later scenes, rather than having him fondle her while she was unconscious.
But, it's your story. So, whatevs. I just thought the sexual advances could have been saved for when the doctor would actually have a private moment with her. He does ask her to visit him at a later date. It just took me out of the story to have the doctor risk fondling her, while she was "under anesthesia" in what would normally be a busy recovery room.
