- Jun 16, 2017
- 7,191
- 7,976
If we've waited that long, we can endure a little longer for the next update.
- Feb 24, 2021
- 769
- 3,805
No, by Rutonat's definition, 1 person gave you constructive criticism, the other 10 were being fucking dickheads crowned with smegma.
Getting exposed to yelling dickheads starts tearing away at your mental health if you have enough exposure to it.
Also, the difference between constructive and nonconstructive criticism has less with how someone responds to it, and more with the contents of the message. Including threats or yelling defeats the "constructive" part of criticism, and is more like destructive criticism.
- Jun 26, 2017
- 649
- 1,171
I see, so definitions don't matter, opinions do. Makes me think back to all the "NTR definition" debates again. I don't believe their version of criticism is the correct way to do things 80% of the time (there are exceptions). However, the fact that you've even acknowledged the fact it is criticism is already enough for me, and that is my final point anyway.
- Sep 4, 2017
- 5
- 25
In NLP they tend to say that "The meaning of your words is what the recipient perceives". This means that, regardless of your intentions, a badly conveyed message from the recipient's perspective is, ultimately, badly conveyed. Therefore since the dev (and probably any other human being) perceives the behavior of certain people to be that of a dickhead, then those people are ultimately dickheads in the way they communicate.
The dev has no obligation to "tough up" against dickhead behavior or learn to perceive it as constructive criticism, especially since the dickheads are actually demanding things from dev and not the other way around. If you have demands, then learn to communicate in a way the dev perceives as constructive criticism.
TLDR; Be a better human being, it pays off in the long run.
The dev has no obligation to "tough up" against dickhead behavior or learn to perceive it as constructive criticism, especially since the dickheads are actually demanding things from dev and not the other way around. If you have demands, then learn to communicate in a way the dev perceives as constructive criticism.
TLDR; Be a better human being, it pays off in the long run.
- Sep 28, 2020
- 1,782
- 3,675
So your argument is that, even if someone insults the dev, if the devs decides to take the insults to heart and modify/improve the game based on it, that makes it "constructive criticism" ?
Nah buddy, that's your argument. Mine is that insulting a dev because you hate osmething about their game isn't constructive, it's being an asshole.
And the previous point I quoted from you shows full well that your logic is that insulting a dev is constructive criticism if the devs decides to take it as such.
You're delusional if you think it's up to how the dev reacts, and what it looks like is that you want to ensure you're blameless if you start doing it.
Giving constructive feedback is very simple and needs no insults. If you insult a dev because you didn't like their game, you're not providing feedback, you're acting like a dick. Period.
- Jun 26, 2017
- 649
- 1,171
This is where this argument began. It all started because someone proclaimed that the criticism the developer received was because "people can't stand diversity". What followed were people proclaiming that people criticizing the game wasn't criticism. It's obvious that by reading my recent replies, the original message has been lost, but my intentions related to this topic remains the same.
The fundamental problem with splitting the "acceptable" and "unacceptable" criticism by judging it as "constructive" is flawed. We as a community obviously don't go by the official definition of "constructive". Since we do not use an official definition, but instead a universal understanding, than the term "constructive criticism" is subjective.
The quote you tagged me in was fairly obviously an attempt to showcase the subjectivity. In the very first line of that quote that you posted says "by your definition". I have also never once claimed people weren't being dicks. I fully suspect that some people were just being assholes just because they could. However, that does NOT mean they weren't being critical, they just weren't being "constructive" based on your universal understanding.
Feedback is feedback. It doesn't matter if it's positive, or negative. It doesn't matter if you like, or dislike it. Criticism is simply criticism. It doesn't really matter if you slap the term constructive onto it. I agree that people shouldn't be a dick for no reason, but fundamentally it remains criticism regardless of the fact.
- Mar 26, 2023
- 572
- 398
you sound like you lack empathy.
there is noone ripped off, he only charges if he updates. you can read it on his patreon.
Well i will wait as long as it takes for the next update
Wow. Glad I never started this one. I like his last game but was going to wait a few years for this one to get some content. Check back in and see it was dropped. Feels bad for people who got invested.
- Jan 23, 2021
- 2,755
- 10,695
well not really dropped, just that the development is a disaster, and it's a shame because I think it had much more potential than parental love.
- Sep 22, 2017
- 7,090
- 15,971
As much as it pains me to say this, I think this game will eventually be abandoned for real. We are at a point where we are lucky if we even get 1 update per year and the updates for this game aren't known for being big. Unless Luxee suddenly stars releasing updates more often, I don't think this game will ever be finished. And if it does it will probably be very rushed.
- Jan 23, 2021
- 2,755
- 10,695
- Sep 3, 2022
- 24,056
- 202,905
He can't be a milker if he isn't accepting money...
I wonder if people actually look.
The dev accepts money when an update is released.
- Jan 26, 2021
- 6,889
- 21,490
Haters gonna hate... here cute Nea pic instead...
- Jan 23, 2021
- 2,755
- 10,695
Only his Patreon is per update. He is pulling in close to $800/month on SubscribeStar.
- Sep 3, 2022
- 24,056
- 202,905
Those are people who want to give money, they are under no obligation to do so.