Others Completed Artificial Academy 2 [MiniPPX v8] [Illusion]

[Tsugumi]

Yeah, seems like I forgot to do my reading assignment: as I went through the modules on the male, I did spot the "Members of gangs will not enter relationships, or consent to sex with anyone who is not a member of their gang" part on the Banchou module. Removed the module on the card via Edit, imported AAU data via QtEdit back into the tweaked card, waited to get the interaction - voila, works fine. So it was indeed Banchou.

You are safe, Empress personality. This time.

 

[Monosomething]

You are safe, Empress personality. This time.

You know, this actually annoys me. These personalities have been ported from AA1 (according to some info ive read). If thats the case... then how are these personalities so utterly borked? Had AA1 not have the same interactions as this one does? Like, Rough works completely fine, and that was a AA1 personality, but Empress, which is also ported from AA1, doesnt? Someone somewhere dropped the ball on these ports. Thats the only explanation i can come up with. To make matters worse - people using modules that twist and turn responses makes the whole thing even more complicated, given that personalities are ported poorly. At times, you can just forget what is being said, since nothing makes sense.

Some of the C4 personalities ive downloaded? I simply praise some chick, and she churns out a fucking essay long monologue as a response. Im like "yeah, okay" *skips*
Then, some random chick comes up and goes "*something something* lets jet". Yeah, i get the last part, but the lead up might mean shes got the Wild trait, so i say no. I go into QtEdit after the day ends to see what she actually said, and she just asked me to follow her *facepalms*

That, though, was part of C4 personalities, and i have no idea where these were lifted from. Hell, some guy with a modded personality comes up and hurls the most elaborate insult ive seen in my life. Given how we both had "Dont know" status towards each other, it got me confused, but the actual meaning of his interaction was something about getting along with another NPC. Huuh?!

Me dumb, okay? Keep things simple!

 

[SleepW4lker]

srry sometimes i kinda take for granted some of you check the 4ch thread or at least the google doc made by stupid hair.....

You must be registered to see the links

AHHHH yes. finally thank you Mate you save my ass

 

[Khami514]

Now that's a blast from the past. Judging by the file names, these packs look like they're meant to be used with the illusion Wizzard. Alas, at the end of the day they are still just compressed archives, so that shouldn't be an issue.

I tried downloading the assets from the webpage you linked but was unsuccessful (clicking on the files results in a failed file retrieval; has the file host deleted them?), so I can only guess here. But knowing Futaboy, the mod is probably a set of hard model replacements, similar to their Fleshy Dildo mod (which I still have, and have posted about in this thread before). If you're somehow able to retrieve the files, you should be able to deploy them by adding them as part of a sets folder that mimics the original game's relevant file structure.

Even if you manage to get this set up, though, you may want to temper your expectations. Old mods like this are often prone to bugs and demand very strict conditions to work correctly.

i did get the mod but i also try converting it into a pp2 file but i dont know what to do with?

 

[Khami514]

why using a mod so old if you have overrides AND A NEW UNCENSOR? thats why most of the builds used by f95 dudes tend to break, just follow the guides, the community made those for a reason you know?


faiz made a mediafire zip with all the textures... iirc he update it last month (or at leats before maker may i think)

1. The dildo from Yuri h gameplay seems to be bugging between censored and uncensored depending which girl I play so I want to fix that
2. I want more sex positions from the straight sex positions so that's why I wanted some of males to be futa at least.

 

[Zadke]

1. The dildo from Yuri h gameplay seems to be bugging between censored and uncensored depending which girl I play so I want to fix that
2. I want more sex positions from the straight sex positions so that's why I wanted some of males to be futa at least.

You're not using jmcp and the civ uncensor right?

I kinda have the same sex positions as a male in a FF scene the only i lack are the futa overrides but those dont affect the actual sex, they're just a mesh

 

[Tsugumi]

Me dumb, okay? Keep things simple!

Walks up to you and asks "What do you think about <character>?" - Yes/No. Simple as can be.

Until you try being nice and helping foster a new friendship between the two just to get a jealous lover because it was not an "are those amazing/awful rumours about the person true?" or an "I want to get to know this person - could you help me out?", but rather an "are you cheating on me?".

Blessed be the Deaf trait. All hail "Huh?".

 

[Monosomething]

Walks up to you and asks "What do you think about <character>?" - Yes/No. Simple as can be.

Until you try being nice and helping foster a new friendship between the two just to get a jealous lover because it was not an "are those amazing/awful rumours about the person true?" or an "I want to get to know this person - could you help me out?", but rather an "are you cheating on me?".

Blessed be the Deaf trait. All hail "Huh?".

Not sure how effective the "Deaf" trait is. Would need to test it... lots. Regular "no" vs "what the fuck did you just say to m... oh, no, i dont like them, sorry".

Somebody got info on that? Rejections cost a fair bit of LLDH, but if Deaf actually lowers the penalty, then... might be yet another good trait! Heh.

 

[Khami514]

You're not using jmcp and the civ uncensor right?
View attachment 3616485
I kinda have the same sex positions as a male in a FF scene the only i lack are the futa overrides but those dont affect the actual sex, they're just a mesh

where do i get them?

 

[Monosomething]

where do i get them?

You... you do know

You must be registered to see the links

exists, yeah? Whats more, you should avoid the download on the main page of this thread - its outdated.

Honestly, can someone tell the mods to remove the download links in this thread and just put a link to the MIG instead? That would save us a LOT of trouble and constant repeats.

 

[154185151]

weird question but does anyone have that one elf card from back in the day the one of legends loved that meme lol

 

[Arde645]

Not sure how effective the "Deaf" trait is. Would need to test it... lots. Regular "no" vs "what the fuck did you just say to m... oh, no, i dont like them, sorry".

Somebody got info on that? Rejections cost a fair bit of LLDH, but if Deaf actually lowers the penalty, then... might be yet another good trait! Heh.

"Deaf" does do quite a bit with reducing penalties when rejecting someone. It actually doesn't affect favourability at all while still functioning basically the same as "No".

It also side-steps all the usual negative outcomes that occur with "No" like getting ignored or increasing the "Rejected" counter.

 

[Monosomething]

"Deaf" does do quite a bit with reducing penalties when rejecting someone. It actually doesn't affect favourability at all while still functioning basically the same as "No".

It also side-steps all the usual negative outcomes that occur with "No" like getting ignored or increasing the "Rejected" counter.

I have actually noticed the lack of rejection count increase in stats when ive had the "Deaf" trait on my card for testing.

Interesting...

What do you mean by getting ignored? A card will always interact with you, regardless of how much they hate you (even if their interaction chance will be in sub 5% range). You mean when they get enough dislike or hate to get the "Not interested" status? If so... well, just dont reject them. Heh. Then again, in a hetero v hetero and homo v homo interactions, its either love or hate, so the deaf trait seems like its mandatory to keep rejecting the other side without incurring the penalties.

Looks like a useful trait. What a surprise!

EDIT: what a shame you cant use it when someone decides to compete over you. I you choose neither, they will both get 4 dislike count towards you, but if you choose one over the other, i know for a fact that the loser gets 2 hate count and 6 dislike count towards you (no idea what the winner gets, but im assuming love count in some degree).

 

[JustAl]

Deaf was always an overpowered trait, which is why the module "No Bullshit" exists - if a card pretends to be Deaf, the holder of that module murders that card. It's a kind of quasi-threat that makes players ever so slightly hesitant to always equip Deaf on cards because nobody but true jerks would put that module on a card to ruin someone's fun pretending to be deaf.

 

[Monosomething]

Deaf was always an overpowered trait, which is why the module "No Bullshit" exists - if a card pretends to be Deaf, the holder of that module murders that card. It's a kind of quasi-threat that makes players ever so slightly hesitant to always equip Deaf on cards because nobody but true jerks would put that module on a card to ruin someone's fun pretending to be deaf.

Yeah, ive seen that module. Kind of interesting that someone would make a module to counter a powerful/overpowered trait, given how this game doesnt have multiplayer and... to my knowledge, the AI never uses the "Huh?" response (at least ive never ran into them using it against me). Guess this is just a counter to players abuse, then?

On the other hand, it seems like Deaf is literally meant to be used in hetero v hetero and homo v homo interactions. How do you deal with the hate/dislike gain without it, when every card will try to get in your pants all the time, because theres no likes in both of these cases. You can friendzone anyone between lean hetero-lean homo characters, but not a pure homo or pure hetero. As ive mentioned, its either love or hate/dislike - you either keep them on the "Dont know" status (it wont last forever - eventually they will "break out" into "I think i like them" status), or they start getting in your pants.

A solution would be to have someone mod the game, so that pure hetero and pure homo characters gain like points towards each other, just like everybody else, just at lowered pace (the gain would have to be set at -50% or something).

Thats, literally, Illusions shortsightedness. With all those fancy mechanics they forgot the one that will constantly come back to bite players in the ass.

 

[JustAl]

Yeah, ive seen that module. Kind of interesting that someone would make a module to counter a powerful/overpowered trait, given how this game doesnt have multiplayer and... to my knowledge, the AI never uses the "Huh?" response (at least ive never ran into them using it against me). Guess this is just a counter to players abuse, then?

On the other hand, it seems like Deaf is literally meant to be used in hetero v hetero and homo v homo interactions. How do you deal with the hate/dislike gain without it, when every card will try to get in your pants all the time, because theres no likes in both of these cases. You can friendzone anyone between lean hetero-lean homo characters, but not a pure homo or pure hetero. As ive mentioned, its either love or hate/dislike - you either keep them on the "Dont know" status (it wont last forever - eventually they will "break out" into "I think i like them" status), or they start getting in your pants.

A solution would be to have someone mod the game, so that pure hetero and pure homo characters gain like points towards each other, just like everybody else, just at lowered pace (the gain would have to be set at -50% or something).

Thats, literally, Illusions shortsightedness. With all those fancy mechanics they forgot the one that will constantly come back to bite players in the ass.

That can be done through module or AI mod. It's a case of "if X NPC has high value for orientation (is homosexual), and you picked X interaction, and it succeeded, make this NPC gain X points of Like to the person who started the conversation with them, or the person who had a positive response to the gay person's chatter."

It's not hard but again, we really do have to put in the effort, huh? I know how to do it the module way but not the AI plugin way. Which is a shame because that way applies persistently across any NPCs for no other effort than drop into the folder with the rest of the mods.

 

[Monosomething]

That can be done through module or AI mod.

AI mod would be a better choice, as i assume it would be global, rather than having to go through a number of cards to implement it. Fortunately for me, i have no idea about either modding OR modules, so somebody else will have to do it. Heh heh...

 

[Grim]

Anyone know if there's a way via trigger to make a character immediately interactable after they lose a fight? I've tried copying what the Brute module supposedly does, by setting the character's LockState to 0, but this doesn't actually seem to work when the character is in the post-fight state on the ground. The red circle remains around them and you can't interact with them. Is there some other way of accomplishing this?

 

[Monosomething]

Just noticed something interesting:

Ive played around for about 2 weeks (up to the first exam) with one character. Had some sex, beat up some bitches, the usual. Thing is... i was playing as a female card (thats new for me) and didnt really like how the whole thing played out (not a fan of female protags, if i can avoid it).

So, on saturday (exam day) ive switched to my "main" card (male - kicked out the female PC). Ive also replaced the teacher, but thats not that important. Heres the thing: ive played through saturday (only two break periods due to the exam) and sunday (also two break periods) without speaking to anybody. All i did those two days is train (to get my strength up). Ive checked QtEdit to see what the class thought of me (out of curiosity), and...

Apparently, for not speaking to anybody, both me and the teacher gained 5 partial dislike points (the teacher got them due to me skipping time while training - they only managed to speak to one person), but the two cards with "Absentminded" trait generated only 1 partial dislike point towards us.

Now... my assumption is obvious. Thats a (potentially) 80% reduction to dislike/hate gain! Holy crap! Avoid cards with this trait - if you get into a relationship with one, you will have a TON of work to do to peel off whoever is going after them, since your partner, due to gaining only 20% dislike/hate, will keep fanning the flames, even if the other card hates them by this point.

Absolutely disgusting.

 

[bloodbirthe]

I want this character to avoid having sex when I'm not playing as them, and the closest module I've found for achieving that purpose is 'not for lewding', but that particular module also applies to player characters, which is a problem. I don't want them to never have sex, I only want them to be able to do it when I can control the scene. I know that I can create a new module and basically rewrite this one without the PC/player character part, but why won't it just let me delete that part? Is there a quicker way to achieve my goal than copying this module from scratch? Again, my goal is to try to avoid characters having sex off camera when I'm not controlling the scene.