- Aug 1, 2018
- 268
- 1,588
I am comparing image to animation. This scene was redone and it's animated now. However the image you see on the 0.31 wasn't exactly a still one. There was some progression and her facial was changing during it.The heck? I haven't played 1.00 yeat so please enlighten me is this because you're comparing image to animation or something? Or why else would the dev downgrade graphics like that?
But what's left of it is just a small preview in the Journal in 1.00.
Not sure if any other scene was redone this way. There are reports in this thead that some of the previous scenes aren't in this version.Are there more different images?
That's probably the reasoning behind it. But the current difference in quality between newer scenes and older ones is not something hidden.Now this is my assumption, maybe they wanted to keep a similar level of quality between images? I believe it would be jarring to see the first image (0.31 one) and then the next image you see is at the quality of the 1.0 one. Perphas it was done to keep the same level of quality all around (even if its downgraded?)
Still kinda sad it's butchered and not utilized somehow as a bonus ingame content. The artworks like this was the reason for me to follow this project.
Last edited: