Let see: 2.6.4 < 2.7.1.
I don't know (or care to look at) the versioning history for this game. Even if this is new, though, the developer can version it however they want. (That is not an endorsement of how they've chosen to do that, TBC.) Clearly they've chosen to use minor update numbering to indicate differences in the type of content. It's not something I would do, but it is what it is.
about the scheme. I only need to understand how it works so I know what to expect.
When lots of folks were bashing this game I wrote it 5 stars review. This game is one in many hundreds I care about and that's why I'm voicing my discontent.I don't know (or care to look at) the versioning history for this game. Even if this is new, though, the developer can version it however they want. (That is not an endorsement of how they've chosen to do that, TBC.) Clearly they've chosen to use minor update numbering to indicate differences in the type of content. It's not something I would do, but it is what it is.
In any case, the reason this version has no animations was explained by the developer. I really don't find it shittification, actually. It's a weird way to go about things, but in practice it would be no different than having an iPhone 9 Platinum, iPhone 9 Gold, iPhone 9 Silver, and iPhone 9 Bronze. And then when iPhone 10 came out, having the same metal-themed equivalent variations. But instead of platinum, gold, silver, and bronze, you have x.x.4, x.x.3, x.x.2, and x.x.1. Again, I'm not a fan of the numbering scheme, but obviously your logic of higher versions doesn't apply for this game — the developer has decided to have it work differently than you assumed.
When I looked at your initial post, I misread and thought you started with "Why" rather than "WTF". So for my part, that was flawed reading, not projection. Thus, since the explanation of the versioning scheme was posted as an answer to the question already asked, I jumped to an incorrect conclusion.
Technically, though, you are assuming the projection rather than allowing for it to have been simply a misreading of what you posted. Doesn't really matter to me in any case; I don't have a dog in this fight. I couldn't give
Meh. At this point, I would just assume anything x.x.1 is always without animations so I'd only play something that's x.x.4. I don't like this use of versioning, but I'll just learn to work within what XLab has chosen to do.
well then it's up to the dev NOT to release publicly incomplete version aka shittified product.
I don't give a rat's ass about any of what you're arguing. Either accept the way he's decided to version releases or don't. I'm not going to go in circles about this with you. This back-and-forth is beginning to contribute toward the shittification of this thread.
It was valiant effort from your part to stifle critisism of product shittification which only contributed to the shittification of the topic. I don't care about what you give or not give rat ass about. More people should complain so that shittification happens for the first and the last time on this game.
It was a valiant effort on your part to reword exactly the same point and try to pretend like you have something new to say. I'm done with the conversation, as I already said. Please don't bother quoting me again. I'm adding you to my Ignore list because you prattle on about the same thing again and again with nothing new to say.
Finally you read the definition of shittification yet you used it incorrectly which tell me that you didn't understand what it means.
well dev can make releases for diff. tiers, highest gets all animations and lowest gets none or patreon version has animations but on public doesn't have.
