wtf dudIn Russia where 99.99 of her fans live and is because she reminds them of they Babushkab
wtf dudIn Russia where 99.99 of her fans live and is because she reminds them of they Babushkab
I ain't sayin nothing but the only girls who look at him like that while they're fucking are the softies who end up falling in love with him, the Mayas and Jills and Sages of the gameThat's because they are having sex. It isn't love, it's lust.
As a student and a concerned citizen, she has every right, and arguably a duty, to report Chad's actions. MC's wishes are not paramount, as much as he (or you) would like them to be. It is understandable that that would annoy one, and it's hardly endearing. No one likes a snitch, after all. But she didn't do anything fundamentally wrong.Others have already written what I wanted to say, but I can add something.
I don't like how Jill took care of the MC in the first season. For example, she gathered a pedagogical council because of the MC/Chad fight and complained about it. I don't like Chad and in the end he got what he deserves according to the script, but:
1. What right does she have to decide for Tremolo? She is not his mother.
"Dangerous" might be an overstatement. This isn't the mafia.2. It was a dangerous move and under other circumstances she would have painted a target on his back.
Dramatic, hyperbolic, and wrong. Given her upbringing and background, she would naturally tend to see the altercation between Chad and Tremolo as a disciplinary "law-and-order" issue for the school to handle, rather than something for Tremolo to deal with "man to man". She would probably just dismiss the latter notion as blue-collar machismo or something.3. She exposed MC as a child in need of care.
She does have a very memeable face.I have other answers that I don't like about her behavior.
And it's not hate, just fun and memes.
It was dangerous, damn dangerous. After all, given Chad's orientation, she would have painted a target not on MC back, but on his ass. Something terrible could have happened."Dangerous" might be an overstatement. This isn't the mafia.
I think the potential way of doing it is using something like Vinny and the gun as the constant, but varying who gets shot by route/behaviour etc. There's plenty of scope of the same series of events (with the police if they are watching Riona, whoever is going after Quinn, and the brewing scandal hovering over Stephen Burke - let alone whatever the hell Bella & James's story is about - and the MC's own, unresolved family backstory; things that are constant regardless of route) but different people getting put in or out of jeaopardy. Much bigger and more complicated than the AL choice, but we are - as you say - working with a much bigger cast and more complex story lines.I'm expecting it to get very dark at some point as well. Tbh I think unlike Acting Lessons this game will become worse for it. I think it worked so well in AL because of the more contained scope and cast alongside the surprise. BaDIK is far bigger and has more characters it's also very popular without leaning into been dark and we also all know it's coming.
Sage, Bella, Josy, Maya, Jill, manwhore and it looks like Zoe will all be major paths. How on earth can you impact that many with dark twists or a dark twist without It feeling heavy handed or contrived? Never mind make it satisfying.
I hope I am wrong but I have a horrible feeling it'll fall flat in comparison to AL.
Thanks for that image. The "Chad path" just took on a whole new meaning.It was dangerous, damn dangerous. After all, given Chad's orientation, she would have painted a target not on MC back, but on his ass. Something terrible could have happened.
It only works at this fictional college though.As a student and a concerned citizen, she has every right, and arguably a duty, to report Chad's actions. MC's wishes are not paramount, as much as he (or you) would like them to be. It is understandable that that would annoy one, and it's hardly endearing. No one likes a snitch, after all. But she didn't do anything fundamentally wrong.
It would actually work in any number of institutional environments where some sort of liability is involved, such as workplaces or the military.It only works at this fictional college though.
This is wrong. If there are witnesses, the assailant can absolutely be prosecuted. It's up the prosecutor, not the spouse. They may choose not to, if the victim is unwilling to testify, but it is incorrect to say that they *cannot* be arrested or punished.Even in real life, if the person who was assaulted doesn't file a report or a complaint or whatever is the right word in english. It won't go anywhere. Reason why many women who are beaten up by their husbands/partners and doesn't want to report it, the agressor can't get arrested or punished even when there are eye witnesses.
WHAT? My choices over my life are not paramount? Huh?!?! The bitch barely knows the MC yet she takes it upon herself to decide what's better for him? She isn't staff, she isn't a professor. She is a fellow student. She may feel the responsibility to report it but she absolutely has no obligation to. If anyone in real life ever pulls a stunt like that they are dead to me. MC is a legal adult and she isn't a parent or guardian.As a student and a concerned citizen, she has every right, and arguably a duty, to report Chad's actions. MC's wishes are not paramount, as much as he (or you) would like them to be. It is understandable that that would annoy one, and it's hardly endearing. No one likes a snitch, after all. But she didn't do anything fundamentally wrong.
Tremolo has not been deprived of any choices.WHAT? My choices over my life are not paramount?
Which gives her the right to report misconduct on campus, or between students.Huh?!?! The bitch barely knows the MC yet she takes it upon herself to decide what's better for him? She isn't staff, she isn't a professor. She is a fellow student.
Most institutions, such as schools, would disagree.She may feel the responsibility to report it but she absolutely has no obligation to.
I see yet another person does not understand the concept of civic duty or institutional responsibility.If anyone in real life ever pulls a stunt like that they are dead to me. MC is a legal adult and she isn't a parent or guardian.
Babushka you say?!In Russia where 99.99 of her fans live and is because she reminds them of they Babushkab
Correctly. Nobody likes snitches. Jill could not have been in any danger for this, because she is from a very wealthy family, the family that founded this college and are its donors. But the MC could be threatened. From the point of view of the law, her actions are correct. The action was risky. What usually happens to those who complain to teachers? That's right, they are bullied even more.As a student and a concerned citizen, she has every right, and arguably a duty, to report Chad's actions. MC's wishes are not paramount, as much as he (or you) would like them to be. It is understandable that that would annoy one, and it's hardly endearing. No one likes a snitch, after all. But she didn't do anything fundamentally wrong.
Extremely dangerous. It's a walking armored vehicle of muscle and bone. But this is the choice of our hero (more precisely, mine), all responsibility for the consequences is on me, not on Jill."Dangerous" might be an overstatement. This isn't the mafia.
And speaking of dangerous moves, how about the idea of Tremolo going one-on-one with some 'roid-raged brute twice his size? Seriously, which course of action is realistically more likely to end him up in the hospital?
I don’t see the difference here, let’s say her motivation corresponds to what you described and this is most likely true. Here I’ll also add that Jill hates bullies, because she herself was a victim of bullying, that is, resisting bullies is her personal vendetta.Dramatic, hyperbolic, and wrong. Given her upbringing and background, she would naturally tend to see the altercation between Chad and Tremolo as a disciplinary "law-and-order" issue for the school to handle, rather than something for Tremolo to deal with "man to man". She would probably just dismiss the latter notion as blue-collar machismo or something.
Of course, that reveals her to be privileged, strongly pro-establishment, and out of touch, which is itself something you might validly not like about her. However, framing it as some deep, hurtful, emasculating betrayal of Tremolo is uncalled-for IMO.
I suppose in a way it *is* guardianship. Tremolo is a full-time student at a university. He is subject to their rules and regulations. And he doesn't get to decide how those are implemented. It would be the same if the characters were in a workplace environment. If Jill saw Chad harassing Tremolo at work, most employers would expect her to report it, even if Tremolo didn't want that. It's her w orkplace, too.But in any case, from the outside it looks like guardianship.
How to get this scene with unknown girl??Hi guys, do you have any solid theories about who this chick might be?
You don't have permission to view the spoiler content. Log in or register now.
Also, I've only played through Jill and Others route so I've got this question:
Why is the episode even called Vixens? I don't get that...
The culture of denunciation as it is. God forbid, such a colleague at work as Jill. If anything goes wrong, she'll snitch on you next time.I suppose in a way it *is* guardianship. Tremolo is a full-time student at a university. He is subject to their rules and regulations. And he doesn't get to decide how those are implemented. It would be the same if the characters were in a workplace environment. If Jill saw Chad harassing Tremolo at work, most employers would expect her to report it, even if Tremolo didn't want that. It's her w orkplace, too.
Others route, Derek's bar after first free roam.How to get this scene with unknown girl??
Stop getting all technical to try to prove your bullshit lol. If one eye witness report that they saw you beating your wife, and they go to talk to your wife and she says that you didn't beat her up, no one will do anything about it lol. It won't even get to the prosecutor because it won't even be filed a report to the police lol. If they say you were both fighting, and both of you say you didn't fight even if your faces are all bruised, they won't do anything either. It is that one person word, against yours.It would actually work in any number of institutional environments where some sort of liability is involved, such as workplaces or the military.
This is wrong. If there are witnesses, the assailant can absolutely be prosecuted. It's up the prosecutor, not the spouse. They may choose not to, if the victim is unwilling to testify, but it is incorrect to say that they *cannot* be arrested or punished.
You made an incorrect statement and were corrected. Deal with it.Stop getting all technical to try to prove your bullshit lol.
If other people saw it, and wish to report it, that is no longer the case. If a neighbor calls the cops to complain about a domestic disturbance, there will absolutely be a police report. That is how many of those cases get reported in the first place. If that neighbor saw actual assault going on, or even videotaped it, there is a non-negligible chance it would go further, with or without the victim's cooperation.If one eye witness report that they saw you beating your wife, and they go to talk to your wife and she says that you didn't beat her up, no one will do anything about it lol. It won't even get to the prosecutor because it won't even be filed a report to the police lol. If they say you were both fighting, and both of you say you didn't fight even if your faces are all bruised, they won't do anything either. It is that one person word, against yours.
Right, because celebrity experiences are how the world actually works for everybody else. If I decked a cooworker in front the rest of the office, I guarantee you I would be out on the street that afternoon with or without a complaint from the victim.Even if you get assaulted in world wide tv as Will Smith smacked Cris Rock at the Oscars, with everyone witnessing it, and Chris Rock say he won't file a report, nothing happens. There is a huge difference between how the things works in the world in your head, and how it actually works.
And again, we are talking about precisely those cases where there is a person 3, 4, etc.Also, the same goes to workplaces or military. If it is the word of 1 person against 2, if there are no other ways to prove what you said, you just gonna look bad. Unless you are Jill in being a dik.
let's assume though that Jill doesn't do this, she doesn't make a personal complaint about what she witnessed (always legitimate).I suppose in a way it *is* guardianship. Tremolo is a full-time student at a university. He is subject to their rules and regulations. And he doesn't get to decide how those are implemented. It would be the same if the characters were in a workplace environment. If Jill saw Chad harassing Tremolo at work, most employers would expect her to report it, even if Tremolo didn't want that. It's her w orkplace, too.