- Jul 7, 2017
- 3,426
- 7,773
- Thread starter N7
- Start date
-
- Tags
- 3dcg anal sex animated big ass big tits cheating combat creampie dating sim exhibitionism female domination female protagonist footjob graphic violence groping group sex handjob humiliation humor interracial lesbian male protagonist management masturbation milf multiple protagonist oral sex point & click prostitution puzzle romance sandbox sex toys spanking strategy stripping teasing titfuck turn based combat vaginal sex virgin voyeurism
- Nov 10, 2020
- 5,435
- 11,659
Yup, but that'd only make it more plausible for him to be poor, with limited work opportunities.
- Nov 10, 2020
- 5,435
- 11,659
While we don't know what kind of opportunities Neil has we know know he is working
- May 17, 2020
- 11,754
- 22,698
there doesn't seem to be any mention of this possible problem in the game, and we've seen Neil on the construction site and talked to people who work with him like Luis the window salesman, so I would dismiss it as a hypothesis
- Feb 28, 2024
- 22
- 287
I personally enjoy the Minigames, they provide some nice padding to the story and it helps to get invested.
- Oct 14, 2020
- 2,025
- 3,313
Someone else made a similar point but 19 years of debt? There is such a thing as bankruptcy and it's not as hard as to get through as most think. It's also a plausible escape for Maya. Anyway we could quibble about it forever. The point is DPC doesn't research, he just makes up and that doesn't make for a very good story. Also, DPC claimed in one post that he visited San Diego once. I don't believe it, he's either totally oblivious or he steps around the truth a lot.
- Jan 6, 2021
- 2,806
- 9,233
He's working, yes...
But maybe he's so dumb that he forgets to collect his salary.
This would not be surprising. He's MC's father after all.
- Nov 10, 2020
- 5,435
- 11,659
- Oct 14, 2020
- 2,025
- 3,313
No that's just an English expression, it doesn't connotate that the bonding began at that time it just indicates that the activity brought Father and Son into a closer bond.
- Oct 14, 2020
- 2,025
- 3,313
- Jan 6, 2021
- 2,806
- 9,233
- Dec 18, 2023
- 169
- 368
Josy and Maya are opposed to each other by DPC himself.
Some character traits stand out more clearly against the background of others.
It doesn't matter that Josy was cheating on Maya. What matters is that Josy's loyalty is now really shown by DPC as one of the most important characteristics of her character. She tells several times that she doesn't want to cheat on Maya and wants to break up first with her and then date MC. She doesn't even look at MC so as not to kiss him accidentally, she's so focused on Maya's fidelity.
The fact that Josy is insecure is true. The rest is just how you interpret the character. Also, Josy having self-doubts is a total fan service, created so that more people like her.Insecure, needy, emotionally immature, sore loser, constant emotional blackmail and she's a cheater
- Nov 13, 2022
- 3,985
- 13,208
And remember guys if the characters don't use common sense or logical reasoning it's not their fault.
- Nov 10, 2020
- 5,435
- 11,659
Josy always had her self-doubts that wasn't something added later it there in ep1 and ep2
- May 17, 2020
- 11,754
- 22,698
And remember guys if the characters don't use common sense or logical reasoning it's not their fault.
View attachment 3417092
Very useful mechanism also for self-identification
- Jul 7, 2017
- 3,426
- 7,773
The question still remains, even if there was only a closer bond? It is suggested to us that Neil is the MC's sole caregiver since his birth. How is an even closer bond supposed to be? No, something is wrong there.
I have grave fears about Lynette. I'm just playing from the beginning again and just read EP6 today so Lynette didn't want Neil to read her diary. There will be something in this diary that Lynette kept from Neil. There are a lot of possibilities as to what it could be, but I imagine it will shock the MC.
- Jul 7, 2017
- 3,426
- 7,773
- Dec 18, 2023
- 169
- 368
- Oct 14, 2020
- 2,025
- 3,313
It will explain how most of the lawsuit theories bantered around on this forum just aren't possible, also look up standing, which is a major roadblock to most suits going forward. One of the provisions of standing is if the court can remedy the complaint in the suit. If the court can't remedy then the case is dead. So, take the Tybalt suit. MC didn't have the money to pay for the damages so the suit would be dead because the court can't order MC to pay money he doesn't have.