- Dec 13, 2018
- 7,748
- 19,535
If DPC had done this kind of thing 3 or 4 times, maybe then we could call it a track record, but they've only done it once and the circumstances were quite different. In AL, right when the relationship was just beginning, it was ended and even though it hurt to see that happen, they had not yet done anything as a throuple so there wasn't as much investment in that dynamic. But here we have a situation where the MC, and by extension the player, will likely be able to spend a few episodes in a relationship with these 2 girls and potentially have a few sex scenes with both at the same time. Therefore, the investment in this relationship will become stronger the more time that is spent in that relationship that to have it taken away by a forced and unavoidable plot element would be a mistake.Given DPC's track record I think it's better to just assume he won't give players any sort poly ending with 2 girls. It's better to keep your expectations low to avoid being dissapointed then to have high expectations only to be greatly dissapointed.
We don't get any sort of threeway endings = that's fine as I wasn't realistically expecting any in the first place.
We do get a or a few threeway endings = Great! a pleasant surprise as I didn't think there would be any.
Imagine if they did this with Bella, that you could have all positive interactions with her, do all of her sex scenes, and make her your primary goal, but despite doing all that, there is no ending for her and the MC. How would that make you feel? How would that make other players feel? Remember the Mass Effect 3 controversy? Saying nothing of the ending, it also had a problem whereby it disregarded player choice and the investment they put in to certain characters from ME2. DPC would essentially be doing the same here to disregard the investment people have in a particular relationship if they make it a no-win scenario.
Last edited: