- Jan 30, 2021
- 467
- 809
thats the issue we like all the girls so we left with ad hominem-argumentsCan we all just collectively stop a discussion at what people actually say rather than spiralling into fallacy?
this thread would be a thousand times more pleasant if people actually discussed and addressed what people were typing rather than broadening the subject matter into vaguely adjacent things and attacking them instead. What is this? Reddit?
If someone says something nice about Jill, discuss what they say don’t call them simps or “basic” because they like the nice girl.
If someone calls out your criticism maybe discuss their rebuttals not screech about criticism being suppressed. Christ on a bike this place and thinking people care you criticise the game. Either defend your criticism or fuck off.
If someone says something negative about Josy. Discuss their criticism don’t write them off as just a hater or whatever.
If someone finds a plot point unbelievable we don’t need a 6th grade essay on suspension of disbelief and/or your personal fucking musings on a fictitious countries legal system. We get it, the loan plot point is weak but it serves a purpose and this isn’t the Hauge. No need for the ropey legal discussion to “prove” your subjective opinion.
We’ve had a solid 100 pages of snide comments and broken records because people don’t actually discuss a topic. They construct a strawman, throw haymakers at it and smugly act like they’ve got something important to say. I’m not innocent in all this shit, I’ve risen to some stuff... but cut this shit out.
someone who doesnt like Josy is blind and NTR fan ... just saying .
as for Jill you gotta be a little weird to like her - and thats why i love her