You are missing the fallout of the failed dream. The California crew will appear in Episode 9. So DPC will need to explain that part of the story as well.
Do we know that for sure? I'm not saying you're lying, I just don't know
What's the point of having variables set for the Cali crew that will transfer to Ep9 if they are not going to be involved with the story going forward?Do we know that for sure? I'm not saying you're lying, I just don't know
Dunno, thats why i asked. So far I see no reason to include them in the story other than for a one-time event or something.
Beta testers do not polish the game, they perform the role of QA, that is, they report errors and bugs that appeared during the passage of the game, and Pink himself fixes errors. And these beta testers are not engaged in setting up the game for digital stores, they are not engaged in changing the game code and the necessary settings for the implementation of digital store achievements. You exaggerate the role of beta testers. Anyone from this forum thread can become a beta tester.You're again making untrue claims about beta-testing seasonal releases for Steam...
You have mentioned it once already some days ago, and I have decided to let it go, but here you are again saying that DPC himself beta tests and 'polishes' the game even though he doesn't and that's a fact -> proofreading and beta-testing of the episodes and Steam releases by his team of beta-testers and his proofreader. I thought that you, as a person who's been on DPC's discord for quite some time, would actually be aware of that, but again, you decide to spin the truth for some reason
a variable is also used to vary a simple line of dialogue, a message, a comment to a photo...
Yeah but you're starting from the assumption that Brett and friends were always meant to be an essential part of the story and so would have to be involved in one way or another. I doubt that's the case. He could've chosen to pare down the extra details and trim some fat, so that we just had what we needed for Zoey's return to make sense. The point of having even just a single other person to bounce ideas off isn't to stop him telling the story he wants to tell, it would just give him the chance to hear another side, and weigh the pros and cons of big time-intensive decisions. I accept that's not going to happen, just saying it didn't have to be this way.
Yes, Dik MC will be able to have anal sex with Jill, while Chick MC will ask permission to make love on Sundays after watching romantic movies about goblins' love for puppies.
Yeah its pretty boring playing as Chick when you know DIK is way more wild and fun. I like Jill alot but god damn she isn't worth my few first playthrough ignoring girls like Camille.
Had to fix that one for you, sorry. It's not just guys who can't stand that drivel.
ProgressProgress!
- Two weeks ago we had ≈1500 renders done, with now 1939 that's +439, a 31.4 R/D.
- If we keep the ≈3800 total renders target, at that rate, rendering will be done by end of August.
- As now, September release (26-28 weeks) is a possible window.
Complete Table with the help of Holy Bacchus† original post — Being a DIK in development since 3 years, 4 months, 17 days (40 months / 176 weeks / 1,233 days / 29,592 hours)
EP1 1301 51 (3:29) — ≈1.1 — days EP2 1709 (+31%) 77 (3:36) (+26) — ≈2.3 (+1.2) 087 (2 months, 28 days |≈12 weeks) EP3 2289 (+34%) 99 (4:42) (+22) — ≈4.1 (+1.8) 105 (3 months, 13 days |≈15 weeks) EP4 2532 (+11%) 134 (7:57) (+35) — ≈6.1 (+2.0) 148 (4 months, 26 days |≈21 weeks) EP5 2456 (-3%) 157 (8:35) (+23) 17 (3.4K$) ≈8.0 (+1.9) 141 (4 months, 20 days |≈20 weeks) EP6 3336 (+35%) 162 (8:33) (+5) 24 (4.8K$) ≈11.1 (+3.1) 169 (5 months, 16 days |≈24 weeks) EP7 3723 (+12%) 250 (18:14) (+88) 18 (3.6K$) ≈14.5 (+3.4) 162 (5 months, 11 days |≈23 weeks) EP8 4158 (+12%) 358 (26:21) (+108) 34 (6.8K$) ≈19.5 (+5.0) 211 (6 months, 28 days |≈30 weeks) EPI 794 36 (4:36) 19 (3.8K$) ≈2.6 (new) 105 (3 months, 13 days |≈15 weeks) EP9 1939 ≈130 (152) — — 112 (3 months, 20 days |≈16 weeks) 17.3
* 199$ Premium Licensed Music ; Total: 22,288$ — Ratio values exclude EPI ; Ratio: (Renders/Days + SecondsAnimations/Days) [Average: 24.0 ; Last Two: 28.5 (+19%)]
Renders/Days [Average: 19.8 ; Last Two: 21.3 (+8%)] — Animations/Days [Average: 1.15 ; Last Two: 1.62 (+41%)] — SecondsAnimations/Days [Average: 4.19 ; Last Two: 7.12 (+69%)]
