Either way an STD test only confirms the condition at that time.... You can get infected after that.... It's not like you're immune after taking a test that comes out negative... And sorry to say so... But not all STD's actually need sex to be transmitted...
Yeah... This is not now logic works. The proper logic would be you get an STD variable when you have sex and the STD test reads that variable to tell you if you have it or not. What you're saying makes zero literal logic sense... I always though you bent logic with your theories for fun but I'm questioning everything here. You either are a master troll or have zero reasoning skills. And I'm leaning towards the former, so I'm leaving it here...
I think it's just a question of you're both not considering the other's point of view and where you're coming from.
But I am considering his viewpoint. I've played D&D and sometimes you can give the players the illusion of choice. No matter what they choose you can make it so the same thing happens eventually. This works because the players don't know this and what could happen if they choose the other option is unknowable, and this is the key part. In a game like this you couldn't do this type of things without making a plothole or just bad writing. I even made a proper programming logic on how this would work properly.I think it's just a question of you're both not considering the other's point of view and where you're coming from.
Dali is coming from a position of more of a behind the scenes programing variables already established prior to the test itself.
IE:
$STD_test_positive = "true/false"; already determined by the game itself.
And you Wizard are coming from a position with a view of the real world outlook.
This isn't a jab at either one of you, I just think it's a question of not quite seeing the other's point of view in the proper perspective. nothing more.
"DPC would have to add that STD variable for every time the MC has sex".
Nah, it needs a donation button for us to donate every time we get amazed or facepalmed by that brain of his.
I think he's just being a dick.... But at least he gave 2 stars, he could have given only 1...
I had to go check what you were referring.. I'll admit, that is a pretty fucking funny rating rant lol
But did you know, that "Being a DIK" is "Full of feminist views and agendas"?I think he's just being a dick.... But at least he gave 2 stars, he could have given only 1...
Like oh ma gawd, for realzies??But did you know, that "Being a DIK" is "Full of feminist views and agendas"?
Think he played "Being a Dyke" and posted the review in the wrong thread... Ah well, shit happens!But did you know, that "Being a DIK" is "Full of feminist views and agendas"?
But that's the thing. Let's say you ban a hypotetical Arieth. The "$STD_clean = "False";" variable would be set at the moment you have sex and would be set to false at the episode 8 for the STD to check it and give a result. So either way we know for a fact this variable is set to false in all paths, or most likely doesn't even exist.Ultimately, I think this particular debate is somewhat pointless because when the script loads up whether from chapter #1 or later on. Because typically variables are not always set at the start of a script, but usually they are 'sanitized' to prevent variable corruption down the road as the script performs.
So the STD variable could very well be already set from the get go as "false" until you sack Air head Arieth (I don't even know if that's even possible in the game as I just never liked that twat, so even if she was a possible LI, I still wouldn't touch her with a mile long pole).
And if Arieth is accessible then it's not much to add a line at the end of that hypothetical Arieth encounter like
$STD_clean = "False";
And that's the only extra code required to make that happen. and if you wanted to get creative you can even create a condition of getting treated for it
If ($STD_clean = "false" && $STD_treatment ="false")
then ($MC_LOSES_ALL_TEETH_AND_GROW_THIRD_ARM_AND_3_NOSES = "true");
and end up with all sorts of hilarity
Point is, programing-wise this isn't much to add to the code to make happen, where it gets complicated is with the scenes and renders. that's mostly where the heavy game work rests.
That's an idea for a game...Think he played "Being a Dyke" and posted the review in the wrong thread... Ah well, shit happens!
That dude just comes across like he hasn't left his trailer park in a few years.But did you know, that "Being a DIK" is "Full of feminist views and agendas"?
Exactly because let's say you're on Josy and Maya's path, who's to say you don't catch an STD in that Jacuzzi when they take you out for their belated B-day surprise. Who knows maybe that water was tainted by a visit from Arieth before you got there. lolBut that's the thing. Let's say you ban a hypotetical Arieth. The "$STD_clean = "False";" variable would be set at the moment you have sex and would be set to false at the episode 8 for the STD to check it and give a result. So either way we know for a fact this variable is set to false in all paths, or most likely doesn't even exist.
And no. Luckily we can't bang Arieth, thankfully
That's an idea for a game...
