- Jul 31, 2020
- 208
- 339
DPC can't control whether we ace a test or fail it. Trying to make a minigame score match a CHIK or DIK outcome is out of his control, since it's player determent. He cannot control the narrative there, minigames determine the outcome. That's the point I'm making.you looked for two precursors to prove your idea and they do not
minigames influence the narrative of the game so they cannot be considered external. DPC would be a fool to make those who play minigames (which in theory should be the way he would want people to play it) have a distorted narrative
you've chosen an extreme example that proves no consistency. having a DIK affinity doesn't mean you took all the DIK major choices and it doesn't mean you decided to cheat on exams.
this is the first time affinity has worked this way, in retrospect we will see if it makes sense, for now it remains an oddity
I'm distinguishing between DPC influencing the narrative and winning minigames. CHIK and DIK are absolutely consistent narratively, when DPC has control.
It's clear what each means. Sure, you don't have to go to either extreme.
Narratively, a pure DIK would cheat on his exams. Minigames-wise, it's how the player performs.
Last edited: