Weeeeeeeeeeeell, we could say that, yes. But let's not forget that we would have to be in the place where the protagonists were before trying to "criticize" their actions. I mean, I know it's a work of fiction, but we have a great affinity for the way the characters were implemented for us. I really like history, it is fun and gives you many options and complications along the way, if you think about some things you might realize that... They are surreal, and that's fine, because when I really play these games (personally) I try to escape from "reality" so to speak by living another funnier story, I am not looking to find a super realistic story where the protagonists make perfect decisions. But we also have to think about our situation, it's easy for us (as viewers) to say that we wouldn't do a certain thing if we were there, but that's the point... We are not there, that's why they give us options of what we want to do. That does not really mean that we could not question the actions of certain characters, but it does raise the possibility that we would have to live that fictitious situation to really know what to do.The problem is you people are trying to make sense of a story designed to unnecesarily drag drama across multiple episodes. Story is the weakest pillar of this game, you will go crazy if you try to pay too much attention to all the absurd things Dr.Pinkcake added into the game.
This is the same guy who put a student assaulting Cathy in the first episode without any consequence, that made Derek post online pictures of a crime with no repercussion, that made the Protagonist rage over Maya and Josy like they were his long time lovers instead of two women he met a few months/ a week ago and that has been draging the whole prostitution-drug ring-free tuition scam.
My advice is enjoy the game but don't look too hard at its story.