ename144
Engaged Member
- Sep 20, 2018
- 3,741
- 15,532
- 681
We don't know that the punishments were exactly the same, just that they both involved cutting off Josy's access to her phone for 4 days (at which point Josy ran off to B&R and the rest was moot). It's possible there were other restrictions that we never hear about because they are not plot relevant.how is it believable that Josy is punished the same way for two completely different things?
we are even told that her father loves Josy very much, so that he punishes her for having sex in his bed is credible, that he punishes her in the same way for having dinner with someone doesn't make sense to me. the presence of wine changes very little, except for wanting to suddenly turn Josy's father into a faded copy of Maya's one
we are not talking about a 14 year old girl, but about a girl who has worked all summer and who is going to college soon.
at this point I much prefer Warscared 's explanation.... he has punished her for cooking, and if she has made pasta with ketch up it seems to me also little
But I still think you're underestimating just how important the argument with Monica was. We know Josy was a bundle of anxiety leading up to the date (she'd already quit the mini-mart), and we know she responds extremely negatively to her step family. It seems plausible that even a comparatively minor infraction (like a clandestine date) could blow up into a screaming match that would demand some sort of punishment from her parents: adult or not, she's living under their roof and Monica IS her stepmother.
But I think this is an example of the subjective measurement of "realism" I was talking about earlier. You think it's dumb for Josy's punishment to be so similar despite two different crimes. I think it's within reason given Josy's state of mind and family situation. We can each make our own assessment of the situation and agree to disagree. But either way, the game explicitly offers an explanation for why events played out as they do. It's just not fair to accuse it of ignoring the differences simply because you find those explanations inadequate.
I think you have a much better case for Cathy's infamous panties. There, the game does not offer any explanation for Cathy to remove the telltale undergarments in the heat of the moment. Perhaps DPC had an appropriate explanation and cut it, or perhaps he just forgot about it; either way, it's a detail that was not addressed and therefore is an example of poor writing.
But I'd still say that's the exception rather than the rule in this game.
When is that NOT the case? Is Hamlet invalidated simply because Polonius just happened to eavesdrop on Hamlet when he was in a particularly unhinged mood? I'd say no, but there's no question that was was a convenient turn of events for the story. As I said, arguing about whether a given random event is 'realistic' is rarely fruitful. Better to focus on whether those events provoke interesting results.If I'm watching a movie and the first half is a light comedy, I don't expect the second half to become a Nolan movie, it could happen, but statistically I would exclude it.
it has nothing to do with whether i liked it or not. it seems clear to me that the construction of the story told, as a succession of causes and effects, is not the central point of BADIK, the central pivot is the creation of situations with strong emotions, with people crying and running away. this for me is basically a soap opera, if for you this is a definition so degrading was not my intention, teen drama is better? the concept does not change
going back to what I was questioning: I was not referring to the plot itself (in which there are things I like and others that I absolutely do not appreciate), but to a whole series of situations in which the game decides not to take into account, essentially for simplicity, and that's fine, but I do not think you can say that in BADIK every aspect is taken into account, DPC takes into account the choices that serve him
As far as this being a teen drama, I'm not sure how that's in doubt. BaDIK is a college-based sex farce; outrageous misunderstandings and angsty melodrama are the whole point of the genre. Now if you're saying DPC will sometimes drive his drama up to 11 when cranking it up to 9 would serve the purpose just as well and put less strain on our suspension of disbelief, then I would agree with you. That is DPC's biggest flaw as a writer, IMHO. I just think that on the whole that flaw is still outweighed by his numerous strengths.
The thing is that Bella's 'help' seems a lot more likely to piss Tybalt off than Jill nodding and smiling through the dates on her own. Tybalt's intentions may be obvious to everyone but Jill, but in the end he just asked for dates. Jill's suffered through bad dates before, surely she can endure three more of them if that's what it takes to keep the MC in the clear.Well that certainly wasn't my interpretation. Jill wasn't surprised, she knows Tybalt is being disingenuous (though apparently not that he's trying to get in her pants). But being a sheltered snowflake, she doesn't know how to placate Tybalt without pissing him off & putting the MC at 'risk'. Hence the plea to Bella for help dealing with Tybalt.
Any contrived excuse to smash Tybalt in the balls is totally worth it though.You don't have permission to view the spoiler content. Log in or register now.
You don't have permission to view the spoiler content. Log in or register now.
The way she all but begs Bella for help definitely gives me the impression that Jill is at her wits end. I can't see how that could be the case unless Jill really is dumber than a box of rocks.
Non-existent. Beta testing historically takes 1-2 weeks, but Episode 7 took ~3 weeks. Episode 8 is not only larger, there's also a lot of other material to test thanks to upgrading Ren'Py and the new save transfer system that will be used in Season 3. We should count our blessings if we actually manage to get this by the 19th.What are the chances of us getting the update next Friday, which is what I'm really hoping for?
Eh, given the state of Elizabethan computing, it probably would not have become nearly as widespread.If this game was released in time Shakespeare's times, it would gain more literature quotation, than his work.
Shakespeare's books do not contain great renders and animations, they do not contain any music, no mini-games either. This game and William's books both contain great stories. To sum up it is 4-1 for my fav game.
Why do you write essays trying to compare products of different eras and different genres? This is just totally stupid, you do not understand art because you are trying to formalize it.
To be serious for a moment, Shakespeare isn't the giant of English literature for his stories (which were nearly all adaptations of classics or historical fiction propagandizing the current monarch). He was renown for his wordplay (which gave us a ridiculous number of metaphors still in use today), and for his characterization. Despite characterization being one of his strong suits, I don't think Dr. Pink Cake is anywhere near that level of mastery. But falling short of the Bard is hardly a useful metric.