Ray_D
Forum Fanatic
- Nov 13, 2022
- 5,104
- 17,026
Who knows why, by the way? Incest is, by definition, family entertainment.(especially since the recent ToS update which has tightened things up on incest)
but do you think DPC who doesn't show prostitutes having sex with their clients or wives kissing their husbands (even MILFs aren't safe, Jade might be a virgin...) should risk making us see or telling something explicity sexual and incestuous with a girl who has to do with MC?There was zero incest in Acting Lessons back when the Patreon rules were significantly more relaxed (especially since the recent ToS update which has tightened things up on incest) and there's been no hint of incest in BaD so far, not one LI who could conceivably be related to the MC, why would DPC suddenly throw in incest between an LI and a different male character (something that would also piss off the anti-NTR crowd even though it would have happened prior to the events in the story)?
It's a buzzword. Like "communist". People are vaguely aware of some of the criteria. They come across something they don't like and think fits the criteria. They throw the word it and think they've scored a goal against the big evil. But they don't actually understand the subject or what is bad or dangerous about it.Who knows why, by the way? Incest is, by definition, family entertainment.
You are a degenerate if you want to fuck your own mother, sister or son, what is hard to understand about this. ?It's a buzzword. Like "communist". People are vaguely aware of some of the criteria. They come across something they don't like and think fits the criteria. They throw the word it and think they've scored a goal against the big evil. But they don't actually understand the subject or what is bad or dangerous about it.
Yeah, it's likely the only explanation, nothing else. Not like it would not make sense, or simply Just Josy and tommy might not want to fuck each other. I mean how the fuck is possible, that two person who are step borther/sister, not wanting to fuck each other?That was why I mentioned that having Josy and Tommy having a sexual past together would piss of the anti-NTR crowd, something that DPC is extremely reluctant to do.
so in the same way that we're not likely to see James and Bella being intimate, we're also not likely to see Quinn and Vinnie or Tommy and JosyThat was why I mentioned that having Josy and Tommy having a sexual past together would piss of the anti-NTR crowd, something that DPC is extremely reluctant to do. We have the prostitutes who could conceivably not fuck their clients (we do have confirmation that they do oral (Rusty mentions Rio gives great blowjobs, Cam herself tells MC that she gives clients blowjobs but doesn't have sex with them)) we're told that Rio "hooked up" with Jamie but that phrase is ambiguous and can mean anything up to and including intercourse. Sarah and Mel more than likely do fuck their clients (and probably other guys without being paid) but we don't see anything to confirm that.
The only girls we are specifically shown to have fucked other guys (or we are explicitly told have) are Arieth (not fuckable by MC), Becky (not fuckable by MC (yet) but blowjob possible), Tania (not fuckable by MC), Heather (not fuckable by MC (yet) but blowjob possible) and Elena (not fuckable by MC (yet, if it is then it would probably involve the guy who has fucked her either watching or joining).
The only fuckable character who is heavily hinted to have fucked another character is Quinn with Vinny suggesting he fucked her in the past, but those people who are anti-NTR can just ignore that and believe that Vinny only said it to wind Quinn up and he is lying about it.
It seems DPC doesn't view oral sex as counting as proper sex, so he's happy for side girls to be confirmed to be giving blowjobs to other guys, or for MC to receive blowjobs from characters who are confirmed to have fucked other guys, but he won't have MC fucking a character confirmed to have fucked another character.
We need the insane asylums back.of course, that is why, man can put on a wig and makeup, and demand it to be called and treated as a woman.
and Societies so wrong about it to reject it.
Should I take it that you don't know what is physically dangerous about incest?of course, that is why, man can put on a wig and makeup, and demand it to be called and treated as a woman.
and Societies so wrong about it to reject it.
Should I take it that if it was not physically dangerous, than it should not been any problem with it all ?Should I take it that you don't know what is physically dangerous about incest?
Well he could have made Josy a virgin, but obviously didn't.There was zero incest in Acting Lessons back when the Patreon rules were significantly more relaxed (especially since the recent ToS update which has tightened things up on incest) and there's been no hint of incest in BaD so far, not one LI who could conceivably be related to the MC, why would DPC suddenly throw in incest between an LI and a different male character (something that would also piss off the anti-NTR crowd even though it would have happened prior to the events in the story)?
well, none called him a woman. He was Freak and Clown, but not a Woman
Actually, tests (and the past) has proven that problems arise after a few generations of incestuous children. So, a brother and sister might have sex and have a couple healthy babies. But let those two have kids, and the chances of defects goes up some. It really starts to show after about the third or fourth generation of incestuous offspring occur. Or so the History Channel once said when doing a show about past nobility being so incestuous.Should I take it that you don't know what is physically dangerous about incest?
as someone who constantly get his comments deleted and warnings, and bans because of the NTR group, I heavily disagreeIt's the anti-NTR crowd that sucks.
Things can have more than one thing wrong with them. The point is having complete understanding of all of them. Otherwise you're just parroting what everyone else tells you.Should I take it that if it was not physically dangerous, than it should not been any problem with it all ?.
that is your angle here?
True. Both go way overboard with their feelings on the subject. I really couldn't care either way. But I guess I lean more to the NTR group as I believe what I said about characters having a past makes it more realistic.as someone who constantly get his comments deleted and warnings, and bans because of the NTR group, I heavily disagree![]()
okay, then it's Degenerate and Dangerous. Now, it's way way off topic now, so we should drop the subjectThings can have more than one thing wrong with them. The point is having complete understanding of all of them. Otherwise you're just parroting what everyone else tells you.
We need a reaction for stimulating conversation,okay, then it's Degenerate and Dangerous. Now, it's way way off topic now, so we should drop the subject![]()
having a past, is not really NTR is it ?.True. Both go way overboard with their feelings on the subject. I really couldn't care either way. But I guess I lean more to the NTR group as I believe what I said about characters having a past makes it more realistic.