iamcomming
Well-Known Member
- Apr 22, 2024
- 1,511
- 1,182
- 249
ohm, i think no, not just sharing. human nature wanting to my opinion be others opinion. if i like Madam Rose, you should like Madam Rose. if you like Tybalt, i should like Tybalt. if i dont like Madam Rose, you shouldnt like Madam Rose. if you dont like Tybalt, i shouldnt like Tybalt.Well,, I did bait you to respond to me,.
But, your take is a bit condradictonial to me, Let's say as you said, you say you don't like Sage and you justify why not. But also as you said, no amount of response would change your mind.
But my question then, why the fuck you even bother then to say your opinion if you not looking for a conversation or response. You obviously want others to know your opinion otherwise, you would not even write it in the first place if that would not be the case.
so, I'm kind of confused, you obviously don't give a fuck about someone else opinion, it does not effect you, but somehow you feel the need to share your opinion.
at least in this "theoretical conversation " what you used as a base for your take
oh btw
View attachment 4119300
![]()
yes, i take his allowance to liking any character of the game. i will give it back after 1 hourSo doesn't it work the other way? As you say you can dislike a character without having to put up with people jumping on you for not liking them and trying to force you to justify your dislike. By that logic you should also be able to state you like a character without someone jumping on you for liking the character? Surely that means that Geralt was also allowed to state that he likes Sage without the other person jumping on his post and telling him that he's not allowed to like Sage?