Blades1138
Active Member
- Jul 29, 2017
- 560
- 1,170
- 344
If it was
While the theory that Vinnie might be angry at Nick makes sense at a glance, what doesn't make sense is the whole context in the game. If it were indeed a frame-job there would be a payoff with the whole thing being revealed to everybody.
Given the fact that only MC knows about the whole thing, the only logical conclusion can be that it's only meant as a clue to who's behind the trashing. The only question up in the air is whether Nick is in on it or not, but like I previously mentioned - if he were, he's doing a piss poor job of covering it up by leaving his own room clean.
I disagree. Even if he defended him, there's no logic to throw him out just for sticking up for his maggot brother. Not to mention Nick is one of the two most decent guys at the frat anyway.you're right, we don't know anything, we don't even know the responsibilities of the DIKs in his removal. haven't they defended him enough?
but whatever why Vinnie might be mad at the DIKs, if Nick is still there, it means he didn't behave so differently from the others
While the theory that Vinnie might be angry at Nick makes sense at a glance, what doesn't make sense is the whole context in the game. If it were indeed a frame-job there would be a payoff with the whole thing being revealed to everybody.
Given the fact that only MC knows about the whole thing, the only logical conclusion can be that it's only meant as a clue to who's behind the trashing. The only question up in the air is whether Nick is in on it or not, but like I previously mentioned - if he were, he's doing a piss poor job of covering it up by leaving his own room clean.