That is a good question. Especially, because the Cathy incident shows that the Rooster clucks can have consequences. I definitely wouldn't be surprised if they have a long term effect. I have been worried for a while given DPC's excitement about the phone that somehow something storywise will happen where the phone will be used against MC.
I think Tommy said the sort of thing people like Tommy say; I see no reason to assume it's any more accurate than the old football chant that went "Posh Spice Takes It Up The Arsenal"
Some other member suggested that 'clucks' were 'for fun' and I was ready to accept that and I'm too lazy to scroll up to credit that user but thank you for proving me wrong. Clucks on rooster are not 'for fun'.
but if what happens on Roster were to be taken seriously how is it possible that Tybalt, who is on Roster, didn't see the photos posted by Derek and used them to convince Jill?
I agree with you 100%.
If this isn't fun, you might want to expand your definition.
I tend to agree. Cathy's Cluck aside, I'm not saying Rooster has any real impact (beyond RPs, which seem to actually have no real impact). I'm just saying I'm not ready to dismiss it, either.
Probably because by that point she's gotten used to the MC and has started to like him, so she's softened and that's why you don't need to be all the the way CHICK to get that kiss.
That only has a consequence because it's part of the game's main narrative that this incident happens. It doesn't mean that any and/or all Rooster posts have consequences because we've already seen several that don't. This is because Rooster is an avoidable and optional thing that players can choose to interact with or not and this game doesn't have major consequences for things that are avoidable.
Except that those are dialogues from unavoidable parts of the main game. Rooster and other optional things like are not likely to have any far reaching consequences because they are avoidable and this game doesn't have that much branching in it.
True, but I wasn't talking about consequences. I was just talking about clues of things to come. The samples I cited had nothing to do with choices or branching, and they made sense only later in the story.
ah ok
Even then, no Rooster post has led to anything happening in the game later, they've just shown what has happpened. If DPC were to go even deeper into branching and interconnectivity between the actions of the characters, then maybe there would be consequences, but for these optional and avoidable side pieces, they seem to exist in a world where they don't result in anything. You can technically play the game without ever looking at Rooster, so to have something happen as a result of a NPC's post, or for something in a post to referenced later on wouldn't make sense if you never saw it.
I hope so too but in the end he's been at B&R longer than the MC has.
Rusty does not seem like the kind of guy to maliciously spread rumours about someone.
Mystery in dialogue with Jill? can you remind me please?
I probably know what's going on, but I just forgot.
seems very unbelievable to me....
the ones with the girls in bed in chapter 5, before Jill goes to sleep on the couch with MCMystery in dialogue with Jill? can you remind me please?
I am this close to calling my Italian grandmother to learn the language.
You should stop with whisky and cocaine, apparently is not helping your judgment
Well, actually there are a few Clucks that are required reading (Cathy, pancakes, etc.). But again, I'm not saying Rooster has an impact on the game's outcome. It simply might be used to place clues here or there.
