Holy Bacchus
Conversation Conqueror
- Dec 13, 2018
- 7,748
- 19,558
- 789
Have you?Have you even played this game? I don't even.
Have you?Have you even played this game? I don't even.
All my theories are based on what can happen in this game, all yours are based on what you want to happen.Have you?![]()
I think you have that the other way around.All my theories are based on what can happen in this game, all yours are based on what you want to happen.
You almost conviced me Mr. Timeline multiverseAll my theories are based on what can happen in this game, all yours are based on what you want to happen.
You've just proved my point.I think you have that the other way around.
You want Lynette to be alive, but she's dead.
You don't want the man bun guy to be Sage's Dad, but he is.
You want the MC to do hard drugs, but he won't.
Sounds like you're talking about yourself here.You just make shit up. Not one thing you said is proven in game, and there's easily enough evidence for them to go the other way, but you can't see the other way because it goes against the game you want to play.
Maybe because he's hiding the truth about her family and what happened after she ran away with him, but not about her dying.Pinkcakes intentionally wrote Neil to be unreliable. Unreliable Narrators mislead the reader on purpose.
No there isn't, and it's been proven time and time again by several other people.There is more than enough evidence to suggest the bearded guy is not Sage's dad, ignore it if you want.
Because it does not seem to be within the MC's character, and I'm not the only one who sees it this way, but you are alone on an island with your "theories".And why can't the MC do cocaine with Quinn? Because you don't want to, is not an answer.
If he hides the truth about one thing why can't he hide it about something else? But you immediately dismiss it because again it goes against your fantasy of the game.Sounds like you're talking about yourself here.
Maybe because he's hiding the truth about her family and what happened after she ran away with him, but not about her dying.
No there isn't, and it's been proven time and time again by several other people.
Because it does not seem to be within the MC's character, and I'm not the only one who sees it this way, but you are alone on an island with your "theories".
One big reason why it's more than likely that Lynette is indeed dead is because of Jill.And whether Lynette is alive or not, we don't know. But a plausible assumption for her death is that she probably wouldn't have left MC alone. If she did, she would be a terrible mother and MC would be better off with the father in any case. Oh yes, there is the theory that Lynette is in a coma, but I guess Neil would visit his Lynette with MC.
See my above comment.If he hides the truth about one thing why can't he hide it about something else? But you immediately dismiss it because again it goes against your fantasy of the game.
It's weed. The MC going from that to coke in such a short space of time would be stretching the boundaries of belief of this game to an even crazier degree than some things already are.The MC started this game with a very hard no on doing any drugs but yet he agrees to it no problem once put in the players hand. Your MC is different from mine as is the nature of games where you get to chose your personality.
Far more connects Sage with the man-bun guy than has ever connected Jill to Lynette, especially since Sage references his behaviour to a tee.I have no more comments on beardo, I put him being Sage's dad as the same level of theory crafting as Jill being the MC aunt. You follow two connecting dots to come to that conclusion which is painfully a misdirection by Pinkcakes.
I would not. It literally makes no sense and is mathematically impossible, and you don't have to know Patreon rules to see that.I'm 100% positive that if it wasn't for you knowing Patreon rules you'd believe Jill was his aunt.
It's just weed. It's less of a drug than alcohol really. I live where it's perfectly legal(and for good reason).He didn't do drugs until he met Quinn. With me, even then, he didn't. Neil also always cautions MC to use condoms. Very responsible.
You're playing chess with a pigeon trying to reason with this guy.One big reason why it's more than likely that Lynette is indeed dead is because of Jill.
On the Jill date, the MC and Jill connect over their shared loss. It's a big moment for them (one that can hopefully also happen even if you don't go on the date) as they've both lost an important family member and it creates a deeper bond between them because they've suffered similar loss and been affected by it, even if the MC is much less affected having never known his Mom.
To take that away by revealing that Lynette is alive ruins that big emotional moment and connection and would be very poor writing on DPC's behalf, and whilst some people might agree with that sentiment and DPC is by no means perfect, I still think he's better than this and would recognise that this is something you do not do as a writer.
See my above comment.
It's weed. The MC going from that to coke in such a short space of time would be stretching the boundaries of belief of this game to an even crazier degree than some things already are.
Far more connects Sage with the man-bun guy than has ever connected Jill to Lynette, especially since Sage references his behaviour to a tee.
I would not. It literally makes no sense and is mathematically impossible, and you don't have to know Patreon rules to see that.
This is probably my favorite theory regarding Jill. It would really bring closer together if true and most importantly isn't too far fetched.One big reason why it's more than likely that Lynette is indeed dead is because of Jill.
On the Jill date, the MC and Jill connect over their shared loss. It's a big moment for them (one that can hopefully also happen even if you don't go on the date) as they've both lost an important family member and it creates a deeper bond between them because they've suffered similar loss and been affected by it, even if the MC is much less affected having never known his Mom.
To take that away by revealing that Lynette is alive ruins that big emotional moment and connection and would be very poor writing on DPC's behalf, and whilst some people might agree with that sentiment and DPC is by no means perfect, I still think he's better than this and would recognise that this is something you do not do as a writer.
I'm going to laugh so hard when you all realize how wrong you are.You're playing chess with a pigeon trying to reason with this guy.
Possible, but given the ages of the two I think it's more likely for Bella to possibly be a friend of Lynette's.This is probably my favorite theory regarding Jill. It would really bring closer together if true and most importantly isn't too far fetched.
But as I said, it undercuts that first emotional connection moment with Jill as it becomes a part of his bond with Jill. Having her return alive and well simply ruins that because it makes that moment superfluous.Assuming MC has been lied to for life, she could still be alive and provide a dramatic story frame when MC learns that his mother is alive.
Well, it does happen fairly often in the real world, so I'm sure there are lots of possible reasons to choose from, but it won't happen anyway so it's not worth wondering about.But it is unlikely. Why would a mother abandon her child?
That makes no sense at all.
The feeling is mutual.I'm going to laugh so hard when you all realize how wrong you are.
No. She was simply talking about how her friend Miranda had the idea to let her stay with her so she wouldn't have to move with her Dad to the place where he was building this hotel complex.When I read Lynette's diary in MC, my first thought was that she wasn't running away with Neil.
My first thought was that she was running away with a woman. Which led me to believe that she was in a lesbian relationship and probably met Neil later.
If Jills sister had about 10-13 years on her (roughly Bella's age) then her age would be similar enough to Lynette's.Possible, but given the ages of the two I think it's more likely for Bella to possibly be a friend of Lynette's.
There's still some ambiguity with regards to when Lynette died and when Jill's sister died in terms of how old they were when it happened. I believe Lynette was 18 when she ran away with Neil, but when was the MC born? When she was 19? 20? 21? We also don't know exactly what the age difference was between Jill and her sister or how old she was when she died. Though judging from the picture in Jill's room, it doesn't appear that there's at least an 18 year difference between them, but Bella is of an age where she, when Lynette was 18, would have been the same age.
However, Lynette has already mentioned the name of two of her friends, Miranda and Viv, so unless Bella changed her name from Miranda to Isabella, any connection of Lynette to her may likely be a nothing burger.
Shitting on the board and acting like you won is not actually winning.You have to turn the joke around. If he plays chess with a pigeon, the pigeon wins.
EDIT: Sorry, it was a spontaneous joke.
I don't think the maths is quite right on that one.If Jills sister had about 10-13 years on her then her age would be similar enough to Lynette's.
The person who keeps saying they're right and everybody else is wrong, and that people will owe them an apology when they believe they'll be proven so.The only question is, who shits on the board?
She can be a few years younger. They don't have to be the same exact age.I don't think the maths is quite right on that one.
One thing we know is that Lynette had just turned 18 when she met Neil. Now, she could have got pregnant and given birth when she was still 18, and presumably her friends Miranda and Viv are the same age as her or a bit older. By the time the MC was born, Jill would either be 2 years old or close to it. This would mean that Jill's sister would have to be at least 16 years older than her in order for her to be either of those friends mentioned by Lynette, and presuming that picture in Jill's room is of her and her sister (which is very likely), there doesn't appear to be an age gap that wide.
Well, I don't see her being as little as 10-13 years older than Jill, as that would only have made her 12-15 when Lynette was 18 and a friendship of that age difference seems unlikely. Also, from how Lynette wrote about them, it would seem likely they were closer to the same age.She can be a few years younger. They don't have to be the same exact age.
Neil was 24 when he met Lynette, so he's at least 43 now (24+19).Do we know Neil's exact age?
Literally everyone is against the pigeon because he's totally illogical. To be clear, it's not holy bacchus who is the pigeon.The only question is, who shits on the board?