Comics Collection Blackadder Collection [2025-12-05] [Blackadder]
- Thread starter muttdoggy
- Start date
-
- Tags
- 3dcg ahegao anal sex bdsm big ass big tits bukkake corruption dilf exhibitionism fantasy female domination futa/trans groping group sex handjob horror humiliation interracial male domination masturbation multiple penetration multiple protagonist oral sex paranormal parody possession prostitution romance sci-fi sex toys spanking stripping teasing titfuck transformation vaginal sex voyeurism
ThreeLeggedMan
Active Member
- May 8, 2020
- 716
- 692
- 187
He is literally mocking his fans. I hope to see some Miriam content from you ngl.
Nah. AI is a tool. A sloppy tool used by sloppy people who want to cut corners. Continue sucking AI cock if you want, but BA now pushing AI, means he's going to be "making" a lot of shit now. We've had three updates from him in November alone, and they're all about AI, and they're all shit. He usually posts once a month, or once every other month.
Not a single artist who has moved to AI has made anything good. There's no skill, there's no expertise, there's no talent, so what exactly are you paying for when it comes to supporting them or custom commissions? They click a button then wait a few minutes, if it doesn't make it right, click again, wait a few more minutes.
It's cheap, it's corner cutting and it's a joke to support "artists" who rely on it.
Instead of stepping up and learning something new, like animating for example and actually improve his art, BA took a step back and is now shouting about how it's actually a good thing.
Not a single artist who has moved to AI has made anything good. There's no skill, there's no expertise, there's no talent, so what exactly are you paying for when it comes to supporting them or custom commissions? They click a button then wait a few minutes, if it doesn't make it right, click again, wait a few more minutes.
It's cheap, it's corner cutting and it's a joke to support "artists" who rely on it.
Instead of stepping up and learning something new, like animating for example and actually improve his art, BA took a step back and is now shouting about how it's actually a good thing.
One of the most famous examples is totally Jason M. Allen, who, like, in 2022 won first prize in the digital art category at the Colorado State Fair in the US for his painting called "Théâtre D'opéra Spatial" (Space Opera Theatre). The painting was generated using the AI program Midjourney and then, you know, touched up by Allen. This caused a huge debate about what art even is and who the real artist is, which, honestly, totally makes the piece "significant" when you think about AI development in the art world.
Another super noteworthy example is this art collective from Paris, Obvious.
So, like, back in 2018, their piece, "Portrait of Edmond Belamy," which was made using a Generative Adversarial Network (GAN) algorithm, sold at a Christie's auction for a whopping $432,500!
That was, like, one of the first AI-created paintings to get such a high price at a major auction, which, obviously, totally marked a breakthrough in how people saw machine-generated creativity. The Obvious collective argued that they were the real artists, because they were the ones who had the vision and chose the algorithm and, you know, the input data.
We should also mention Fernando Sánchez Castillo, who used AI (like, the generative fill feature in a graphics program) to totally recreate Diego Velázquez's lost masterpiece called "The Expulsion of the Moriscos," which burned down like, 300 years ago. I mean, even though the AI here is more of a reconstruction and support tool, the artist himself, like, stresses that it was only 20% of the project, and the other 80% was his actual artistic creation and directing the whole process.
Piotrek
Member
- Aug 19, 2018
- 243
- 400
- 230
Correct AI is a tool and can be use to assist the artist to improve on many levels. Give it time, both the AI and Artist is evolving.
BA clearly hit a wall, or "writers block" on the creativity side of things (retiring popular models, failed models etc) now needs to find that magic again; and he looked to AI for assistance (which is easier, yet controversial; some are for or against AI to assist artists).
As much as I hate to say it, there is a demand for AI art. Usually folk willing to drop their standards or don't care where it comes from.
This I more agree with.
AI is a tool and if an artist used it simply make their life easier and make content faster, then I wouldn't be opposed to it in the slightest.
What I hate is exactly what the likes of Blackadder and Miro are doing. Taking the easy route of using AI to make their content entirely rather than as a tool to enhance or speed up things. They are doing the same thing that the asshole AI bros are doing on the likes of twitter and thinking that a prompt fed into an AI tool is just as creative or artistic as actually spending the time to learn and craft a skill to create something you actually put effort into.
That's why I hate AI 'artists'. Using AI and claiming to be an artist is like using a calculator and claiming to be a math genius.
And now Blackadder has joined those assholes. Fantastic.
For mathematical geniuses, the calculator is not a substitute for thinking, but a tool for quickly and accurately performing numerically demanding tasks that do not add value to the process of abstract problem-solving. In academic and research environments, this often takes the form of advanced software, rather than a simple pocket calculator.
AI, much like a scientific calculator, is a powerful extension of the human mind, allowing for the achievement of results that would be impractical or impossible to attain without such support. This does not make either the mathematical genius or the artist less creative—it simply changes their working methods.
The History of Art is inextricably linked to the history of technology. Every new tool, from the invention of oil paints to ready-made paint in a tube, and subsequently the camera or digital software such as Photoshop and 3D programs, initially provoked fears about the authenticity of creation. However, in every instance, these innovations did not kill art, but rather liberated it, shifting the burden of work from tedious technical tasks to abstract vision. Just as mathematical geniuses use advanced software to focus on proof instead of manual calculation, AI enters the artist's studio as a powerful extension of the mind. Integrated generative functions in graphic applications, from filling backgrounds to creating foundational 3D textures, automate "numerically demanding" visual tasks. This means that in a few years, these tools will become the obvious standard, and the discussion will not be about whether it is art, but rather how creators will utilize this new computational power to produce works of unprecedented scale and complexity, focusing entirely on unique concept and artistic intent.
Last edited:
I'm not entirely sure what the exact fuss is about, but you mentioned photos, so I reckon it’s photos you're talking about, not 3D graphics. The thing is, the 3D graphics posted around here aren't exactly 'correct' by any standard. Those scenes with the monsters are clearly scenes of young women being raped, and I don't think anyone's got any real doubt about that. Sure, some collections are clearly consensual sex scenes, but a fair chunk of it is forced sex, which is basically rape, isn’t it?
I’m not casting judgement, but if you’re saying the photos aren't 'correct', then sadly, the same can be said for all the rest of it. The 3D graphics themselves aren't actually illegal because they aren't real scenes of rape, they’re just made up. Mind you, rape scenes in porn films aren’t real either, they’re just choreographed.
The lively debate over which form of pornography – raw, realistic photos or stylised 3D graphics – packs the biggest punch really boils down to the subtle differences in the psychology of perception. Both sides have a point, but the final outcome is always down to how the material actually engages the viewer's grey matter.
Those who argue that photos are sharper tend to focus on their immediate, unflinching realism. The authenticity and raw physical fidelity to reality, even if it's staged, provides an intense, 'ready-made' visual stimulus. This form hits the recipient instantly and is often considered more potent simply because it’s grounded in the real world.
Conversely, the argument for the greater power of graphics and 3D imagery hinges on the mechanism of sparking the imagination. Since computer-generated content, while often hyper-realistic, is never perfectly real, it leaves a little gap that the viewer's brain must actively fill in. This need to actively guess the details and elaborate on the fantasy requires deeper cognitive engagement. Graphics also allow for virtually unlimited idealisation and styling of characters and scenarios well beyond physical possibilities. This combination of engaging the imagination and presenting idealised visions means that for many viewers, graphics don't just feel more powerful, but they have a more lasting impact on fantasy and the brain's reward system.
To sum up, realism provides a sharp, instant jolt of intensity, whereas the stylisation and idealisation in 3D graphics foster a longer, more complex imaginative engagement, which is often perceived as having a greater overall impact.
Last edited:
Higha LaBoeuf
Member
- Feb 6, 2018
- 441
- 426
- 268
He and many other adult art creators are now using AI since it's easier, faster, and cheaper. Unfortunately, this is going to become increasingly common as AI becomes more advanced and accurate.
And just like that, the sales tank and we move on to real artists.
The future of digital visuals is definitely heading toward a team-up where 3D graphics stop being the main goal and just become a killer tool to help AI push for absolute photorealism. 3D artists will start focusing on building the structural skeleton of a scene—we're talking precise geometry, animation, and getting the lighting logically set up—basically acting as the 'architects of the digital world.' Then, AI jumps in. It'll take that raw foundation and completely take over the job of generating the final, indistinguishable realism. Using advanced models like NeRF or Deep Learning techniques, the AI will instantly slap on all the complex details to the 3D image, things like microscopic textures, subtle imperfections in materials, and complicated lighting effects that right now need super long and expensive traditional rendering. This evolution is going to drastically cut down production time and seriously boost visual quality, effectively blurring the line between a real photograph and something totally generated digitally.
With AI, it's already possible to transform these 3D Blackadder graphics into realistic scenes, indistinguishable from real life. I stumbled upon this somewhere before, because someone had already converted a few such images.
With AI, it's already possible to transform these 3D Blackadder graphics into realistic scenes, indistinguishable from real life. I stumbled upon this somewhere before, because someone had already converted a few such images.
Last edited:
The issue isn't really that a 3D model is being moved around by an AI in a 3D-generated environment. For some, the problem is that 3D graphics are starting to look less and less like graphics and more and more like reality, specifically because of AI. Just as the angular 3D models from early games were eventually replaced by highly realistic—but still 3D—models, we're now witnessing the next leap in 3D modeling. AI will increasingly play the main role here, taking over the 3D rendering process and giving models a realism that is virtually indistinguishable from reality.
sonarchy3d
New Member
- Feb 4, 2025
- 6
- 12
- 22
He might aswell start giving out his models to people that can make stuff with them or port them over to blender if he's not gonna use them.
Frankly, I don't much care for models that are indistinguishable from reality. As a matter of fact, I'd much rather see them remain as stylized as they are right now. It's just the sort of mental i need to enjoy blackadder's work. If this was an actual, realistic-looking being raped, I'd be gone in a heartbeat.
He's not going to touch Blender with a ten foot barge pole even if his life depended on it. He'd rather crash and burn than see himself succeed and at that point get a strong "We told you so" if he did
ThreeLeggedMan
Active Member
- May 8, 2020
- 716
- 692
- 187
Someone who have access to BA should tell him this. At least he can share the removed models and those which he no longer uses like Miriam, Skyla etc. Dumbass dude erased the best of his models like a joke..
"The Blackadder situation is crazy" video when?
Seriously though, their downfall SHOULD be studied.
Seriously though, their downfall SHOULD be studied.